Literature DB >> 2584250

Survivorship of cemented knee replacements.

G R Scuderi1, J N Insall, R E Windsor, M C Moran.   

Abstract

The survivorship method of analysis has been used to compare the failure rate and overall success of 1,430 cemented primary total knee arthroplasties performed at The Hospital for Special Surgery over a 15-year period. There were 224 total condylar prostheses with a polyethylene tibia, 289 of the posterior stabilised type with an all polyethylene tibia, and 917 posterior stabilised with a metal-backed tibial component. There were 12 failures in the total condylar series, giving an average annual failure rate of 0.65% and a 15-year success rate of 90.56%. The posterior stabilised prosthesis with a polyethylene tibia showed an average annual failure rate of 0.27% and a 10-year success rate of 97.34%, and this prosthesis with a metal-backed tibial component gave an annual failure rate of 0.19% and a seven-year success rate of 98.75%. The overall survival rate was not influenced by sex or age, diagnosis or the percentage of ideal body weight. No metal-backed tibial components have yet needed revision for loosening. It seems that infection will be the major cause of failure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2584250

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br        ISSN: 0301-620X


  42 in total

1.  Total knee replacement: the joint of the decade. A successful operation, for which there's a large unmet need.

Authors:  C G Moran; T C Horton
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-03-25

2.  Posterior cruciate ligament function following total knee arthroplasty: the effect of joint line elevation.

Authors:  G J Emodi; J J Callaghan; D R Pedersen; T D Brown
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  1999

3.  High rate of infection control with one-stage revision of septic knee prostheses excluding MRSA and MRSE.

Authors:  Joachim Singer; Andreas Merz; Lars Frommelt; Bernd Fink
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-11-12       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  [Logistic requirements and biopsy of periprosthetic infections: what should be taken into consideration?].

Authors:  B Fink; P Schäfer; L Frommelt
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 5.  Tibial component designs in primary total knee arthroplasty: should we reconsider all-polyethylene component?

Authors:  Tao Cheng; Xiaoyun Pan; Tao Liu; Xianlong Zhang
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-10-05       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Finite element analysis: a comparison of an all-polyethylene tibial implant and its metal-backed equivalent.

Authors:  S M Thompson; D Yohuno; W N Bradley; A D Crocombe
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-12-22       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  International multi-centre survivorship analysis of mobile bearing total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  James B Stiehl; Karel J Hamelynck; Paul E Voorhorst
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2006-03-18       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  Posteriorly stabilised (Insall-Burstein) total condylar knee arthroplasty. A follow-up study of 157 knees.

Authors:  D V Patel; P M Aichroth; J S Wand
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  Total knee replacement.

Authors:  J Noble; R C Hilton
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1991-08-03

10.  Tibial component in total knee arthroplasty: To cement or not to cement?

Authors:  P Cherubino; C Castelli; F A Grassi
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  1996-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.