Literature DB >> 1522105

Posterior stabilized prosthesis. Results after follow-up of nine to twelve years.

S H Stern1, J N Insall.   

Abstract

We reviewed, nine to twelve years postoperatively, the records on an original cohort of 289 arthroplasties (218 patients) in which a posterior stabilized knee prosthesis with an all-polyethylene tibial component had been inserted at The Hospital for Special Surgery. One hundred and eighty intact prostheses in 139 patients were available for this analysis. Fourteen knees in fourteen patients had had a revision procedure. Five of these fourteen patients had had a bilateral arthroplasty, but only one knee of each of the five patients had been revised. Forty-eight of the patients (sixty-six knees) had died less than nine years after the operation. Twenty-nine other knees (twenty-two patients) had been lost to follow-up before a nine-year evaluation could be performed. Considering all 194 knees (including the fourteen that had been revised), the result with the system of The Hospital for Special Surgery was excellent for 117 knees (61 per cent), good for fifty-one (26 per cent), fair for twelve (6 per cent), and poor for the fourteen knees (7 per cent) that had been revised. The 180 knees in which the prosthesis was intact were also rated with the new scoring system of The Knee Society: the average postoperative knee score was 92 points (range, 35 to 100 points), and the average score for function was 66 points (range, 0 to 100 points). Survivorship analysis showed that the average annual rate of failure was 0.4 per cent and that the over-all rate of success at thirteen years was 94 per cent.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1522105

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  37 in total

1.  Average 7-year survivorship and clinical results of a newer primary posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jessica Ehrhardt; Naomi Gadinsky; Stephen Lyman; Daniel Markowicz; Geoffrey Westrich
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2011-04-13

2.  The Oxford unicompartmental knee prosthesis: an independent 10-year survival analysis.

Authors:  Peter Vorlat; Guy Putzeys; Dominique Cottenie; Tom Van Isacker; Nicole Pouliart; Frank Handelberg; Pierre-Paul Casteleyn; Filip Gheysen; René Verdonk
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2005-05-14       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  [Quadriceps-sparing minimally invasive technique for total knee arthroplasty : a new classification].

Authors:  T M Coon
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 1.087

4.  International multi-centre survivorship analysis of mobile bearing total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  James B Stiehl; Karel J Hamelynck; Paul E Voorhorst
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2006-03-18       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Tibial post wear in posterior-stabilized knee replacements is design-dependent.

Authors:  Bridgette D Furman; Joseph Lipman; Mordechai Kligman; Timothy M Wright; Steven B Haas
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-08-14       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Two-year follow-up on joint stability and muscular function comparing rotating versus fixed bearing TKR.

Authors:  C Luring; H Bathis; F Oczipka; C Trepte; H Lufen; L Perlick; J Grifka
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2005-12-14       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Co-contraction in RA patients with a mobile bearing total knee prosthesis during a step-up task.

Authors:  Eric H Garling; Nienke Wolterbeek; Sanne Velzeboer; Rob G H H Nelissen; Edward R Valstar; Caroline A M Doorenbosch; Jaap Harlaar
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2008-05-14       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Anteroposterior stability after posterior cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  A J Schuster; A L von Roll; D Pfluger; T Wyss
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-01-14       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 9.  Which primary total knee replacement? A review of currently available TKR in the United Kingdom.

Authors:  R Y Liow; D W Murray
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 1.891

10.  [Surgical treatment of knee joint osteoarthritis in the middle-aged patient].

Authors:  Martin Pietsch; Siegfried Hofmann
Journal:  Wien Med Wochenschr       Date:  2007-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.