Literature DB >> 22879420

Image jitter enhances visual performance when spatial resolution is impaired.

Lynne M Watson1, Niall C Strang, Fraser Scobie, Gordon D Love, Dirk Seidel, Velitchko Manahilov.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Visibility of low-spatial frequency stimuli improves when their contrast is modulated at 5 to 10 Hz compared with stationary stimuli. Therefore, temporal modulations of visual objects could enhance the performance of low vision patients who primarily perceive images of low-spatial frequency content. We investigated the effect of retinal-image jitter on word recognition speed and facial emotion recognition in subjects with central visual impairment.
METHODS: Word recognition speed and accuracy of facial emotion discrimination were measured in volunteers with AMD under stationary and jittering conditions. Computer-driven and optoelectronic approaches were used to induce retinal-image jitter with duration of 100 or 166 ms and amplitude within the range of 0.5 to 2.6° visual angle. Word recognition speed was also measured for participants with simulated (Bangerter filters) visual impairment.
RESULTS: Text jittering markedly enhanced word recognition speed for people with severe visual loss (101 ± 25%), while for those with moderate visual impairment, this effect was weaker (19 ± 9%). The ability of low vision patients to discriminate the facial emotions of jittering images improved by a factor of 2. A prototype of optoelectronic jitter goggles produced similar improvement in facial emotion discrimination. Word recognition speed in participants with simulated visual impairment was enhanced for interjitter intervals over 100 ms and reduced for shorter intervals.
CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest that retinal-image jitter with optimal frequency and amplitude is an effective strategy for enhancing visual information processing in the absence of spatial detail. These findings will enable the development of novel tools to improve the quality of life of low vision patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22879420      PMCID: PMC3440939          DOI: 10.1167/iovs.11-9157

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci        ISSN: 0146-0404            Impact factor:   4.799


  29 in total

1.  Retinal ganglion cell synchronization by fixational eye movements improves feature estimation.

Authors:  Martin Greschner; Markus Bongard; Pal Rujan; Josef Ammermüller
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Vision and mobility performance of subjects with age-related macular degeneration.

Authors:  Shirin E Hassan; Jan E Lovie-Kitchin; Russell L Woods
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 1.973

3.  Microsaccades counteract visual fading during fixation.

Authors:  Susana Martinez-Conde; Stephen L Macknik; Xoana G Troncoso; Thomas A Dyar
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2006-01-19       Impact factor: 17.173

4.  Miniature eye movements enhance fine spatial detail.

Authors:  Michele Rucci; Ramon Iovin; Martina Poletti; Fabrizio Santini
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2007-06-14       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  High-speed switchable lens enables the development of a volumetric stereoscopic display.

Authors:  Gordon D Love; David M Hoffman; Philip J W Hands; James Gao; Andrew K Kirby; Martin S Banks
Journal:  Opt Express       Date:  2009-08-31       Impact factor: 3.894

6.  The NimStim set of facial expressions: judgments from untrained research participants.

Authors:  Nim Tottenham; James W Tanaka; Andrew C Leon; Thomas McCarry; Marcella Nurse; Todd A Hare; David J Marcus; Alissa Westerlund; B J Casey; Charles Nelson
Journal:  Psychiatry Res       Date:  2009-06-28       Impact factor: 3.222

7.  Psychophysics of reading--XVI. The visual span in normal and low vision.

Authors:  G E Legge; S J Ahn; T S Klitz; A Luebker
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Temporal properties of spatial contrast vision.

Authors:  M A Georgeson
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 9.  Visual requirements for reading.

Authors:  S G Whittaker; J Lovie-Kitchin
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 1.973

10.  Global data on visual impairment in the year 2002.

Authors:  Serge Resnikoff; Donatella Pascolini; Daniel Etya'ale; Ivo Kocur; Ramachandra Pararajasegaram; Gopal P Pokharel; Silvio P Mariotti
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  2004-12-14       Impact factor: 9.408

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  High Tech Aids Low Vision: A Review of Image Processing for the Visually Impaired.

Authors:  Howard Moshtael; Tariq Aslam; Ian Underwood; Baljean Dhillon
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2015-08-14       Impact factor: 3.283

2.  Temporal modulation improves dynamic peripheral acuity.

Authors:  Jonathan A Patrick; Neil W Roach; Paul V McGraw
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Active confocal imaging for visual prostheses.

Authors:  Jae-Hyun Jung; Doron Aloni; Yitzhak Yitzhaky; Eli Peli
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2014-11-03       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Suboptimal eye movements for seeing fine details.

Authors:  Mehmet N Agaoglu; Christy K Sheehy; Pavan Tiruveedhula; Austin Roorda; Susana T L Chung
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2018-05-01       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Word Mode: a crowding-free reading protocol for individuals with macular disease.

Authors:  Stuart Wallis; Yit Yang; Stephen J Anderson
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-01-19       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Contrast sensitivity reveals an oculomotor strategy for temporally encoding space.

Authors:  Antonino Casile; Jonathan D Victor; Michele Rucci
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2019-01-08       Impact factor: 8.140

7.  Altered eye movements during reading under degraded viewing conditions: Background luminance, text blur, and text contrast.

Authors:  Haojue Yu; Foroogh Shamsi; MiYoung Kwon
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2022-09-02       Impact factor: 2.004

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.