Literature DB >> 19183924

[A novel knee endoprosthesis with a physiological joint shape. Part 1: Biomechanical basics and tribological studies].

K-H Frosch1, T Floerkemeier, C Abicht, P Adam, H Dathe, J Fanghänel, K M Stürmer, D Kubein-Meesenburg, H Nägerl.   

Abstract

The natural tibiofemoral joint (TFJ) functions according to a roll-glide mechanism. In the stance phase (0-20 degrees flexion), the femur rolls backwards over the tibia plateau, while further flexion causes increased gliding. This kinematics is based on the principle of a quadruple joint. The four morphological axes of rotation are the midpoints of the curvatures of the medial and lateral femoral condyles and the medial and lateral tibia plateau. In addition, the medial and lateral compartments are shifted a few millimetres in a sagittal direction, the medial tibia plateau being concave and the lateral plateau convex. In most knee arthroplasties, these factors are not taken into account; instead they are equipped with symmetrical medial and lateral joint surfaces. Thereby, the midpoints of the curvatures of the sagittal contours of the lateral and medial joint surfaces, on the femoral as well as on the tibial sides, create a common axis of rotation which does not allow a physiological roll-glide mechanism. The goal of this study was therefore to report on the biomechanical basis of the natural knee and to describe the development of a novel knee endoprosthesis based on a mathematical model. The design of the structurally new knee joint endoprosthesis has, on the lateral side, a convex shape of the tibial joint surface in a sagittal cross section. Furthermore, from a mathematical point of view, this knee endoprosthesis possesses essential kinematic and static properties similar to those of a physiological TFJ. Within the framework of the authorization tests, the endoprosthesis was examined according to ISO/WC 14243 in a knee simulator. The abrasion rates were, thereby, lower than or at least as good as those for conventional endoprostheses. The presented data demonstrate a novel concept in knee arthroplasty, which still has to be clinically confirmed by long term results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19183924     DOI: 10.1007/s00113-008-1550-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Unfallchirurg        ISSN: 0177-5537            Impact factor:   1.000


  12 in total

1.  Methodology for long-term wear testing of total knee replacements.

Authors:  P S Walker; G W Blunn; J P Perry; C J Bell; S Sathasivam; T P Andriacchi; J P Paul; H Haider; P A Campbell
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Influence of surface geometry and the cam-post mechanism on the kinematics of total knee replacement.

Authors:  H Pandit; T Ward; D Hollinghurst; D J Beard; H S Gill; N P Thomas; D W Murray
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2005-07

3.  The load-bearing area in the knee joint.

Authors:  P S Walker; J V Hajek
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1972-11       Impact factor: 2.712

4.  In vivo sagittal plane kinematics of the Avon patellofemoral arthroplasty.

Authors:  David Hollinghurst; James Stoney; Thomas Ward; Hemant Pandit; David Beard; David W Murray
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 4.757

Review 5.  [Biomechanical principles of diarthroses and synarthroses. III: Mechanical aspects of the tibiofemoral joint and role of the cruciate ligaments].

Authors:  H Nägerl; D Kubein-Meesenburg; H Cotta; J Fanghänel
Journal:  Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb       Date:  1993 Sep-Oct

6.  A three-dimensional mathematical model of the knee-joint.

Authors:  J Wismans; F Veldpaus; J Janssen; A Huson; P Struben
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 2.712

7.  Tibiofemoral movement 1: the shapes and relative movements of the femur and tibia in the unloaded cadaver knee.

Authors:  H Iwaki; V Pinskerova; M A Freeman
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2000-11

8.  Real in vivo kinematic differences between mobile-bearing and fixed-bearing total knee arthroplasties.

Authors:  J L Rees; D J Beard; A J Price; H S Gill; P McLardy-Smith; C A F Dodd; D W Murray
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Relative motion of a mobile bearing inlay after total knee arthroplasty--dynamic in vitro study.

Authors:  C Stukenborg-Colsman; S Ostermeier; K H Wenger; C J Wirth
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 2.063

10.  Rollback in posterior cruciate ligament-retaining total knee arthroplasty. A radiographic analysis.

Authors:  H Kim; R R Pelker; D H Gibson; J F Irving; J K Lynch
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 4.757

View more
  1 in total

1.  Kinematic change of the meniscus and the tibiofemoral joint space in asymptomatic volunteers using a wide bore 3T closed MRI system.

Authors:  Eugene Kim; Yeo Ju Kim; Jang Gyu Cha; Mi Young Kim; Dae Hyung Lee; Soon Gu Cho; Ryuh Sup Kim
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2015-06-16       Impact factor: 2.199

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.