Literature DB >> 9268082

Measurement of flow in small vessels by magnetic resonance phase mapping techniques: an in vitro and in vivo study.

P E Summers1, S R Parsons, M G Taylor, P B Deverall, T S Padayachee.   

Abstract

The measurement of blood flow in small arteries is a potential extension of magnetic resonance (MR) angiography. We have compared flow measurements based on MR phase mapping with those obtained by Doppler ultrasound and electromagnetic flowmetry in both phantom and animal models. Correlation between modalities was high for in vitro studies (R2 = 0.93-0.98). In vivo, electrocardiogram-gated MR and Doppler ultrasound flow measurements compared to electromagnetic flowmetry showed fair correlation coefficients (R2 = 0.73 and 0.66, respectively). However, limits of agreement indicated that in small vessels flow measured by the three modalities could differ by up to +/-90 mL/min. For both models, arteries in the range of 3-6.5 mm in diameter produced complementary errors in area and velocity measurements in MR studies. Ungated MR studies showed a reduced agreement (R2 = 0.88 in vitro, 0.54 in vivo), which may in part be due to poor sampling of the velocity pattern. The results show that the high correlation obtained in vitro cannot be extrapolated to the in vivo situation, where additional physiological and anatomical variables are encountered.

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9268082     DOI: 10.1007/bf02592249

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  MAGMA        ISSN: 0968-5243            Impact factor:   2.310


  12 in total

1.  The measurement of time-averaged flow by magnetic resonance imaging using continuous acquisition in the carotid arteries and its comparison with Doppler ultrasound.

Authors:  M Tarnawski; S Padayachee; D J West; M J Graves; V T Ayton; M G Taylor; M A Smith
Journal:  Clin Phys Physiol Meas       Date:  1990-02

2.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Accuracy and precision of MR velocity mapping in measurement of stenotic cross-sectional area, flow rate, and pressure gradient.

Authors:  L Søndergaard; F Ståhlberg; C Thomsen; A Stensgaard; K Lindvig; O Henriksen
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1993 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.813

4.  Accuracy of phase-contrast flow measurements in the presence of partial-volume effects.

Authors:  C Tang; D D Blatter; D L Parker
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1993 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.813

5.  Blood flow measurements in the aorta and major arteries with MR velocity mapping.

Authors:  H G Bogren; M H Buonocore
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1994 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.813

6.  A comparative study of velocity measurements in major blood vessels using magnetic resonance imaging and Doppler ultrasound.

Authors:  F V Zananiri; P C Jackson; M Halliwell; R A Harris; J K Hayward; E R Davies; P N Wells
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 3.039

7.  Nontriggered magnetic resonance velocity measurement of the time-average of pulsatile velocity.

Authors:  M B Hofman; M Kouwenhoven; M Sprenger; A C van Rossum; J Valk; N Westerhof
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 4.668

8.  Analysis of systematic and random error in MR volumetric flow measurements.

Authors:  R L Wolf; R L Ehman; S J Riederer; P J Rossman
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 4.668

9.  Blood flow measurement using variable velocity encoding in the RR interval.

Authors:  M H Buonocore
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 4.668

10.  Direct cardiac NMR imaging of heart wall and blood flow velocity.

Authors:  P van Dijk
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 1.826

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.