Literature DB >> 2182272

The measurement of time-averaged flow by magnetic resonance imaging using continuous acquisition in the carotid arteries and its comparison with Doppler ultrasound.

M Tarnawski1, S Padayachee, D J West, M J Graves, V T Ayton, M G Taylor, M A Smith.   

Abstract

A continuous acquisition method was used to measure the time-averaged flow in the carotid arteries of 10 normal volunteers, using an interleaved flow-sensitive and flow-compensated field echo sequence on a 1.5 T magnetic resonance (MR) system. Validation of the sequence and technique was performed using a pulsatile rotating phantom. The measured flow rates for the common carotid arteries were compared with Doppler ultrasound values obtained immediately after the MR measurement using a Duplex scanner. The correlation (r = 0.52, P less than 0.01) was significant with data spread accounted for by the inherent errors of both techniques. The difference between time-averaged flow measured by MR and Doppler ultrasound was 1.9%. Short-term reproducibility of each technique was assessed by consecutive measurements with values of 6.8% and 6.6% respectively for MR and Doppler; measurements after a 2 - 4 week interval gave a long-term reproducibility of 11.8% and 9.8% respectively. The advantages of continuous acquisition make the method suitable for non-invasive flow measurements, particularly for vessels that are not accessible to ultrasound.

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2182272     DOI: 10.1088/0143-0815/11/1/002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Phys Physiol Meas        ISSN: 0143-0815


  7 in total

1.  Optimization of MR phase-contrast-based flow velocimetry and shear stress measurements.

Authors:  Taeho Kim; Ji-Hyea Seo; Seong-Sik Bang; Hyeon-Woo Choi; Yongmin Chang; Jongmin Lee
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2009-12-29       Impact factor: 2.357

2.  Measurement of flow in small vessels by magnetic resonance phase mapping techniques: an in vitro and in vivo study.

Authors:  P E Summers; S R Parsons; M G Taylor; P B Deverall; T S Padayachee
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 2.310

3.  Clinical features associated with internal carotid artery occlusion do not correlate with MRA cerebropetal flow measurements.

Authors:  K J van Everdingen; L J Kappelle; C J Klijn; W P Mali; J van Der Grond
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 10.154

Review 4.  Duplex ultrasound for diagnosing symptomatic carotid stenosis in the extracranial segments.

Authors:  Nicolle Cassola; Jose Cc Baptista-Silva; Luis Cu Nakano; Carolina Dq Flumignan; Ricardo Sesso; Vladimir Vasconcelos; Nelson Carvas Junior; Ronald Lg Flumignan
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2022-07-11

5.  Inter- and intra-rater reliability of blood and cerebrospinal fluid flow quantification by phase-contrast MRI.

Authors:  Inga Koerte; Caroline Haberl; Michael Schmidt; Andreas Pomschar; Sang Lee; Petra Rapp; Denise Steffinger; Rong-Wen Tain; Noam Alperin; Birgit Ertl-Wagner
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2013-01-31       Impact factor: 4.813

6.  Blood-flow volume quantification in internal carotid and vertebral arteries: comparison of 3 different ultrasound techniques with phase-contrast MR imaging.

Authors:  S O Oktar; C Yücel; D Karaosmanoglu; K Akkan; H Ozdemir; N Tokgoz; T Tali
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 7.  Changing concepts of cerebrospinal fluid hydrodynamics: role of phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging and implications for cerebral microvascular disease.

Authors:  Stavros Michael Stivaros; Alan Jackson
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 7.620

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.