Literature DB >> 9250762

Acrylic cement creeps but does not allow much subsidence of femoral stems.

N Verdonschot1, R Huiskes.   

Abstract

It has been suggested that the endurance of cemented femoral reconstructions in total hip arthroplasty is affected by the creep of acrylic cement, but it is not known to what extent cement creeps under loading conditions in vivo, or how this affects load transfer. We have simulated the long-term creep properties of acrylic cement in finite-element models of femoral stem constructs and analysed their effects. We investigated whether subsidence rates measured in vivo could be explained by creep of acrylic cement, and if polished, unbonded, stems accommodated creep better than bonded stems. Our findings showed that polished prostheses subsided only about 50 microm as a result of cement creep. The long-term prosthetic subsidence rates caused by creep of acrylic cement are therefore very small and do not explain the excessive migration rates which have sometimes been reported. Cement creep did, however, relax cement stresses and create a more favourable stress distribution at the interfaces. These trends were found around both the bonded and unbonded stems. Our results did not confirm that polished, unbonded, stems accommodated creep better than bonded stems in terms of cement and interface stress patterns.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9250762     DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.79b4.7173

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br        ISSN: 0301-620X


  11 in total

1.  Creep behavior comparison of CMW1 and palacos R-40 clinical bone cements.

Authors:  C Liu; S M Green; N D Watkins; P J Gregg; A W McCaskie
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 3.896

2.  Factors affecting the mechanical and viscoelastic properties of acrylic bone cement.

Authors:  A J C Lee; R S M Ling; Sabina Gheduzzi; Jean-Pierre Simon; R J Renfro
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 3.896

3.  Dynamic creep and mechanical characteristics of SmartSet GHV bone cement.

Authors:  C Z Liu; S M Green; N D Watkins; D Baker; A W McCaskie
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.896

4.  The relationship between stem subsidence and improvement in the radiolucency in polished tapered stems.

Authors:  Ayumi Kaneuji; Tanzo Sugimori; Toru Ichiseki; Kiyokazu Fukui; Kengo Yamada; Tadami Matsumoto
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2006-04-14       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Prediction of the long-term creep behaviour of hydroxyapatite-filled polyethylmethacrylate bone cements.

Authors:  J C Arnold; Nicholas P Venditti
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2007-05-10       Impact factor: 3.896

6.  Using 'subcement' to simulate the long-term fatigue response of cemented femoral stems in a cadaver model: could a novel preclinical screening test have caught the Exeter matt problem?

Authors:  A Race; M A Miller; K A Mann
Journal:  Proc Inst Mech Eng H       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 1.617

7.  Healing of femoral fractures by the meaning of an innovative intramedullary nail.

Authors:  V Filardi
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2018-01-17

8.  The effect of cement creep and cement fatigue damage on the micromechanics of the cement-bone interface.

Authors:  Daan Waanders; Dennis Janssen; Kenneth A Mann; Nico Verdonschot
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2010-08-07       Impact factor: 2.712

9.  Creep and fatigue behavior of a novel 2-component paste-like formulation of acrylic bone cements.

Authors:  Ulrike Köster; Raimund Jaeger; Mareike Bardts; Christian Wahnes; Hubert Büchner; Klaus-Dieter Kühn; Sebastian Vogt
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2013-04-06       Impact factor: 3.896

10.  Stem subsidence of polished and rough double-taper stems: in vitro mechanical effects on the cement-bone interface.

Authors:  Ayumi Kaneuji; Kengo Yamada; Kenichi Hirosaki; Masahiro Takano; Tadami Matsumoto
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.717

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.