Literature DB >> 15348171

Creep behavior comparison of CMW1 and palacos R-40 clinical bone cements.

C Liu1, S M Green, N D Watkins, P J Gregg, A W McCaskie.   

Abstract

The restrained dynamic creep behaviors of two clinical bone cements, Palacos R-40 and CMW1 have been investigated at room temperature and body temperature. It was found that the two cements demonstrated significantly different creep deformations, with Palacos R-40 bone cement demonstrating higher creep strain than CMW1 bone cement at each loading cycle. For both cements, two stages of creep were identified with a higher creep rate during early cycling followed by a steady-state creep rate. The test temperature had a strong effect on the creep performance of the bone cements with higher creep rate observed at body temperature. The relationship between creep deformation and loading cycles can be expressed by single logarithmic model. The SEM examinations revealed that CMW1 bone cement is more sensitive to defects within the specimen especially to the defects at the edges of the specimen than Palacos R-40 bone cement. However, in the absence of micro-cracks or defects within the inner surface layer, the dynamic loading (at less than 10.6 MPa) is unlikely to produce micro-cracks in the CMW1 bone cement. The different behaviors between the two bone cements may be attributed to differences in chemical compositions and molecular weight distributions.

Entities:  

Year:  2002        PMID: 15348171     DOI: 10.1023/a:1020328218520

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med        ISSN: 0957-4530            Impact factor:   3.896


  13 in total

1.  Characterization of bone cements.

Authors:  J R de Wijn; T J Slooff; F C Driessens
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1975-04

2.  Evaluation of a hip joint simulator.

Authors:  S L Smith; I C Burgess; A Unsworth
Journal:  Proc Inst Mech Eng H       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 1.617

3.  Will stress shielding limit the longevity of cemented femoral components of total hip replacement?

Authors:  W H Harris
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 4.  Effectiveness of hip prostheses in primary total hip replacement: a critical review of evidence and an economic model.

Authors:  A Faulkner; L G Kennedy; K Baxter; J Donovan; M Wilkinson; G Bevan
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 4.014

5.  Acrylic cement creeps but does not allow much subsidence of femoral stems.

Authors:  N Verdonschot; R Huiskes
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1997-07

6.  Experience with the Exeter total hip replacement since 1970.

Authors:  J L Fowler; G A Gie; A J Lee; R S Ling
Journal:  Orthop Clin North Am       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 2.472

7.  Creep characteristics of hand- and vacuum-mixed acrylic bone cement at elevated stress levels.

Authors:  T L Norman; V Kish; J D Blaha; T A Gruen; K Hustosky
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  1995-04

Review 8.  Mechanical properties of bone cement: a review.

Authors:  S Saha; S Pal
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  1984-04

9.  Long-term compressive creep deformation and damage in acrylic bone cements.

Authors:  D J Chwirut
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  1984-01

10.  Effects of cement creep on stem subsidence and stresses in the cement mantle of a total hip replacement.

Authors:  Z Lu; H McKellop
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  1997-02
View more
  3 in total

1.  Dynamic creep and mechanical characteristics of SmartSet GHV bone cement.

Authors:  C Z Liu; S M Green; N D Watkins; D Baker; A W McCaskie
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.896

2.  Analysis of rheological properties of bone cements.

Authors:  M K D Nicholas; M G J Waters; K M Holford; G Adusei
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2007-02-03       Impact factor: 3.896

3.  Prediction of the long-term creep behaviour of hydroxyapatite-filled polyethylmethacrylate bone cements.

Authors:  J C Arnold; Nicholas P Venditti
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2007-05-10       Impact factor: 3.896

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.