Literature DB >> 15348558

Factors affecting the mechanical and viscoelastic properties of acrylic bone cement.

A J C Lee1, R S M Ling, Sabina Gheduzzi, Jean-Pierre Simon, R J Renfro.   

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to report a series of experiments investigating the factors that influence the viscoelastic properties of acrylic bone cement. The effects of the brand of cement, the length of time since mixing, temperature, the hydration of the cement, and the influence of fat and or blood in the environment on the creep and stress relaxation behavior of the cement have been studied in laboratory-prepared specimens in tension, compression and four point bending. Although there are significant differences in the viscoelastic behavior of some of the different brands of polymethylmethacrylate based cements, these differences are small by comparison with the major effects that can be exerted by the length of time since mixing and some environmental factors. These effects have important practical consequences, especially with regard to the ability of bench top and theoretical studies to predict reliably the mechanical and viscoelastic behavior of acrylic cement in vivo.

Entities:  

Year:  2002        PMID: 15348558     DOI: 10.1023/a:1016150403665

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med        ISSN: 0957-4530            Impact factor:   3.896


  20 in total

1.  Low-friction arthroplasty with Boneloc bone-cement: outcome at 2 to 4 years.

Authors:  J P Walczak; J C D'Arcy; K R Ross; S E James; A V Bonnici; S R Koka; R W Morris
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 4.757

2.  Migration, stem shape, and surface finish in cemented total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  R Huiskes; N Verdonschot; B Nivbrant
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Exeter and charnley arthroplasties with Boneloc or high viscosity cement. Comparison of 1,127 arthroplasties followed for 5 years in the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register.

Authors:  O Furnes; S A Lie; L I Havelin; S E Vollset; L B Engesaeter
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1997-12

4.  Acrylic cement creeps but does not allow much subsidence of femoral stems.

Authors:  N Verdonschot; R Huiskes
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1997-07

5.  In vivo versus in vitro polymerization of acrylic bone cement: effect on material properties.

Authors:  W L Bargar; S A Brown; H A Paul; T Voegli; Y Hseih; N Sharkey
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 3.494

Review 6.  Fatigue properties of acrylic bone cements: review of the literature.

Authors:  W Krause; R S Mathis
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  1988-04

7.  Early failure with Boneloc bone cement. 4/8 femoral stems loose within 3 years.

Authors:  S Suominen
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1995-02

Review 8.  Mechanical properties of bone cement: a review.

Authors:  S Saha; S Pal
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  1984-04

9.  Effects of cement creep on stem subsidence and stresses in the cement mantle of a total hip replacement.

Authors:  Z Lu; H McKellop
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  1997-02

10.  Total hip arthroplasty with Boneloc: loosening in 102/157 cases after 0.5-3 years.

Authors:  A R Nilsen; M Wiig
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1996-02
View more
  7 in total

1.  Analysis of rheological properties of bone cements.

Authors:  M K D Nicholas; M G J Waters; K M Holford; G Adusei
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2007-02-03       Impact factor: 3.896

2.  Prediction of the long-term creep behaviour of hydroxyapatite-filled polyethylmethacrylate bone cements.

Authors:  J C Arnold; Nicholas P Venditti
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2007-05-10       Impact factor: 3.896

3.  Real-time synchronous measurement of curing characteristics and polymerization stress in bone cements with a cantilever-beam based instrument.

Authors:  Sri Vikram Palagummi; Forrest A Landis; Martin Y M Chiang
Journal:  Rev Sci Instrum       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 1.523

4.  Dynamic mechanical behavior of PMMA based bone cements in wet environment.

Authors:  R De Santis; F Mollica; L Ambrosio; L Nicolais; D Ronca
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 3.896

5.  Biomechanical comparison of tigecycline loaded bone cement with vancomycin and daptomycin loaded bone cements.

Authors:  Sedit Kıvanç Muratlı; Vasfi Karatosun; Bora Uzun; İzge Günal
Journal:  Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 1.511

6.  Elution and Mechanical Strength of Vancomycin-Loaded Bone Cement: In Vitro Study of the Influence of Brand Combination.

Authors:  Sheng-Hsun Lee; Ching-Lung Tai; Szu-Yuan Chen; Chih-Hsiang Chang; Yu-Han Chang; Pang-Hsin Hsieh
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-11-17       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Evaluating surface coatings to reduce bone cement adhesion to point of care 3D printed molds in the intraoperative setting.

Authors:  Brian Beitler; Gregory R Roytman; Grace Parmer; Steven M Tommasini; Daniel H Wiznia
Journal:  3D Print Med       Date:  2022-08-12
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.