Literature DB >> 9218141

Broad tuning of rat taste cells for four basic taste stimuli.

T Sato1, L M Beidler.   

Abstract

The breadth of responsiveness of rat taste cells to the four basic taste stimuli was studied using the entropy measure (H) proposed by Smith and Travers. H values range from 0.0 for narrow tuning to 1.0 for broad tuning. Based on the responses of depolarizing receptor potentials of 26 rat taste cells to the four basic taste stimuli, taste cells were classified into nine NaCl-best, four Q-HCl (quinine-HCl)-best, 10 HCl-best and three sucrose-best cells. NaCl-best cells were narrowly tuned to the four basic taste stimuli, but the other three stimuli-best cells were broadly tuned to the stimuli. In all, 85% of the taste cells responded to more than one of four basic taste stimuli. The mean H values for NaCl-best, Q-HCl-best, HCl-best and sucrose-best cells were 0.285, 0.832, 0.781 and 0.796 respectively. The mean H value for all 26 taste cells was 0.621. This was larger than H in rat gustatory fibers. Transformation of large H values in taste cells into small H values in taste fibers may be due to a non-random interaction between taste cells and taste fibers during the synaptic formation. Broad tuning properties of rat taste cells suggest that the across-taste cell response pattern may play an important role in taste quality coding mechanisms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9218141     DOI: 10.1093/chemse/22.3.287

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chem Senses        ISSN: 0379-864X            Impact factor:   3.160


  12 in total

1.  Citric acid and quinine share perceived chemosensory features making oral discrimination difficult in C57BL/6J mice.

Authors:  Yada Treesukosol; Clare M Mathes; Alan C Spector
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2011-03-17       Impact factor: 3.160

2.  Breadth of tuning and taste coding in mammalian taste buds.

Authors:  Seth M Tomchik; Stephanie Berg; Joung Woul Kim; Nirupa Chaudhari; Stephen D Roper
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-10-03       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 3.  Molecular mechanisms of taste transduction in vertebrates.

Authors:  Yoshiro Ishimaru
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2009-01-29       Impact factor: 2.634

4.  Cell-to-cell communication in intact taste buds through ATP signalling from pannexin 1 gap junction hemichannels.

Authors:  Robin Dando; Stephen D Roper
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2009-12-15       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  Individual mouse taste cells respond to multiple chemical stimuli.

Authors:  Alejandro Caicedo; Kyung-Nyun Kim; Stephen D Roper
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2002-10-15       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  Distribution of gustatory sensitivities in rat taste cells: whole-cell responses to apical chemical stimulation.

Authors:  T A Gilbertson; J D Boughter; H Zhang; D V Smith
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-07-01       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Gustatory processing in thoracic local circuits of locusts.

Authors:  Stephen M Rogers; Philip L Newland
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2002-09-15       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  A gustotopic map of taste qualities in the mammalian brain.

Authors:  Xiaoke Chen; Mariano Gabitto; Yueqing Peng; Nicholas J P Ryba; Charles S Zuker
Journal:  Science       Date:  2011-09-02       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Taste Receptor Signaling.

Authors:  Debarghya Dutta Banik; Kathryn F Medler
Journal:  Handb Exp Pharmacol       Date:  2022

Review 10.  The neural processing of taste.

Authors:  Christian H Lemon; Donald B Katz
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2007-09-18       Impact factor: 3.288

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.