Literature DB >> 17913917

Breadth of tuning and taste coding in mammalian taste buds.

Seth M Tomchik1, Stephanie Berg, Joung Woul Kim, Nirupa Chaudhari, Stephen D Roper.   

Abstract

A longstanding question in taste research concerns taste coding and, in particular, how broadly are individual taste bud cells tuned to taste qualities (sweet, bitter, umami, salty, and sour). Taste bud cells express G-protein-coupled receptors for sweet, bitter, or umami tastes but not in combination. However, responses to multiple taste qualities have been recorded in individual taste cells. We and others have shown previously there are two classes of taste bud cells directly involved in gustatory signaling: "receptor" (type II) cells that detect and transduce sweet, bitter, and umami compounds, and "presynaptic" (type III) cells. We hypothesize that receptor cells transmit their signals to presynaptic cells. This communication between taste cells could represent a potential convergence of taste information in the taste bud, resulting in taste cells that would respond broadly to multiple taste stimuli. We tested this hypothesis using calcium imaging in a lingual slice preparation. Here, we show that receptor cells are indeed narrowly tuned: 82% responded to only one taste stimulus. In contrast, presynaptic cells are broadly tuned: 83% responded to two or more different taste qualities. Receptor cells responded to bitter, sweet, or umami stimuli but rarely to sour or salty stimuli. Presynaptic cells responded to all taste qualities, including sour and salty. These data further elaborate functional differences between receptor cells and presynaptic cells, provide strong evidence for communication within the taste bud, and resolve the paradox of broad taste cell tuning despite mutually exclusive receptor expression.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17913917      PMCID: PMC3717408          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1863-07.2007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  35 in total

1.  Taste cells with synapses in rat circumvallate papillae display SNAP-25-like immunoreactivity.

Authors:  R Yang; H H Crowley; M E Rock; J C Kinnamon
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2000-08-21       Impact factor: 3.215

2.  Coding of sweet, bitter, and umami tastes: different receptor cells sharing similar signaling pathways.

Authors:  Yifeng Zhang; Mark A Hoon; Jayaram Chandrashekar; Ken L Mueller; Boaz Cook; Dianqing Wu; Charles S Zuker; Nicholas J P Ryba
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2003-02-07       Impact factor: 41.582

3.  "Type III" cells of rat taste buds: immunohistochemical and ultrastructural studies of neuron-specific enolase, protein gene product 9.5, and serotonin.

Authors:  C L Yee; R Yang; B Böttger; T E Finger; J C Kinnamon
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2001-11-05       Impact factor: 3.215

4.  In situ Ca2+ imaging reveals neurotransmitter receptors for glutamate in taste receptor cells.

Authors:  A Caicedo; M S Jafri; S D Roper
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2000-11-01       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Individual mouse taste cells respond to multiple chemical stimuli.

Authors:  Alejandro Caicedo; Kyung-Nyun Kim; Stephen D Roper
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2002-10-15       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  Mammalian sweet taste receptors.

Authors:  G Nelson; M A Hoon; J Chandrashekar; Y Zhang; N J Ryba; C S Zuker
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2001-08-10       Impact factor: 41.582

7.  Distribution of gustatory sensitivities in rat taste cells: whole-cell responses to apical chemical stimulation.

Authors:  T A Gilbertson; J D Boughter; H Zhang; D V Smith
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-07-01       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Sense of taste in a new world monkey, the common marmoset: recordings from the chorda tympani and glossopharyngeal nerves.

Authors:  Vicktoria Danilova; Yuri Danilov; Thomas Roberts; Jean-Marie Tinti; Claude Nofre; Göran Hellekant
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  A transient receptor potential channel expressed in taste receptor cells.

Authors:  Cristian A Pérez; Liquan Huang; Minqing Rong; J Ashot Kozak; Axel K Preuss; Hailin Zhang; Marianna Max; Robert F Margolskee
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 24.884

10.  Sour taste stimuli evoke Ca2+ and pH responses in mouse taste cells.

Authors:  T A Richter; A Caicedo; S D Roper
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2003-01-17       Impact factor: 5.182

View more
  116 in total

1.  Subsets of Spiny Striosomal Striatal Neurons Revealed in the Gad1-GFP BAC Transgenic Mouse.

Authors:  Verginia C Cuzon Carlson; Brian N Mathur; Margaret I Davis; David M Lovinger
Journal:  Basal Ganglia       Date:  2011-11-01

Review 2.  "Tasting" the airway lining fluid.

Authors:  G Krasteva; W Kummer
Journal:  Histochem Cell Biol       Date:  2012-07-10       Impact factor: 4.304

Review 3.  It's all a matter of taste: gustatory processing and ingestive decisions.

Authors:  Christian H Lemon
Journal:  Mo Med       Date:  2010 Jul-Aug

4.  Sodium/calcium exchangers selectively regulate calcium signaling in mouse taste receptor cells.

Authors:  Steven A Szebenyi; Agnieszka I Laskowski; Kathryn F Medler
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-05-12       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 5.  Gustatory and reward brain circuits in the control of food intake.

Authors:  A J Oliveira-Maia; C D Roberts; S A Simon; M A L Nicolelis
Journal:  Adv Tech Stand Neurosurg       Date:  2011

6.  Citric acid and quinine share perceived chemosensory features making oral discrimination difficult in C57BL/6J mice.

Authors:  Yada Treesukosol; Clare M Mathes; Alan C Spector
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2011-03-17       Impact factor: 3.160

7.  GABA, its receptors, and GABAergic inhibition in mouse taste buds.

Authors:  Gennady Dvoryanchikov; Yijen A Huang; Rene Barro-Soria; Nirupa Chaudhari; Stephen D Roper
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-04-13       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 8.  Taste bud homeostasis in health, disease, and aging.

Authors:  Pu Feng; Liquan Huang; Hong Wang
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2013-11-28       Impact factor: 3.160

9.  The selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor paroxetine decreases breakpoint of rats engaging in a progressive ratio licking task for sucrose and quinine solutions.

Authors:  Clare M Mathes; Jillian R Gregson; Alan C Spector
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2012-12-19       Impact factor: 3.160

10.  Effect of gap junction blocker beta-glycyrrhetinic acid on taste disk cells in frog.

Authors:  Toshihide Sato; Kazuhisa Nishishita; Yukio Okada; Kazuo Toda
Journal:  Cell Mol Neurobiol       Date:  2009-01-15       Impact factor: 5.046

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.