Literature DB >> 9201666

Genetic testing for susceptibility to breast cancer: findings from women's focus groups.

I Tessaro1, N Borstelmann, K Regan, B K Rimer, E Winer.   

Abstract

Before designing an intervention to assist women in making informed decisions about BRCA1 testing, we conducted focus groups with women who had breast cancer and unaffected women whose relatives had it to better understand women's knowledge, concerns about testing, and potential influences and support needs in making a decision about genetic testing for susceptibility to breast cancer. Findings show a general lack of knowledge about genetic testing for breast cancer and what it means to have a positive test result, a strong concern for family members, particularly daughters, to use information from testing to help them make better decisions about their health and lifestyle choices, a strong sense of altruism, particularly among affected women, about being tested to help other women, not just family, and various support needs surrounding the testing experience, including an active role for physicians in the decision process. The major advantages to testing seem to be for information that could help reduce uncertainty and assist with making future decisions about medical treatment and plans for surveillance and some lifestyle changes. The major disadvantages to testing were concerns about confidentiality and loss of insurance, the lack of proven options for women after testing, and stress from knowing one had the BRCA1 mutation. These focus group discussions show women's concerns and ambivalence about genetic testing. We need to provide women with balanced information about the positive and negative aspects of such testing, determine how best to involve physicians in women's decisions about testing, consider the effects of testing on family relationships, and provide more public education about what genetic testing is and what it means.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9201666     DOI: 10.1089/jwh.1997.6.317

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Womens Health        ISSN: 1059-7115            Impact factor:   2.681


  11 in total

Review 1.  State of the science: social, psychological, and ethical nursing research in genetics.

Authors:  G Anderson
Journal:  Biol Res Nurs       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 2.522

2.  Facilitators and Challenges in Psychosocial Adaptation to Being at Increased Familial Risk of Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Louise Heiniger; Melanie A Price; Margaret Charles; Phyllis N Butow
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2015-03-05       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  Falling through the cracks. Women's experiences of ineligibility for genetic testing for risk of breast cancer.

Authors:  J L Bottorff; L G Balneaves; J Buxton; P A Ratner; M McCullum; K Chalmers; T Hack
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 3.275

4.  Factors influencing patients' decisions to decline cancer genetic counseling services.

Authors:  K P Geer; M E Ropka; W F Cohn; S M Jones; S Miesfeldt
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 5.  Cases in Precision Medicine: Concerns About Privacy and Discrimination After Genomic Sequencing.

Authors:  Deborah Stiles; Paul S Appelbaum
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2019-05-07       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 6.  Patient perspectives of medical confidentiality: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Pamela Sankar; Susan Mora; Jon F Merz; Nora L Jones
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  Successful use of peer educators for sharing genetic information.

Authors:  Vickie L Venne; Heidi A Hamann
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2007-06-28       Impact factor: 2.537

8.  Overestimation of hereditary breast cancer risk.

Authors:  J D Iglehart; A Miron; B K Rimer; E P Winer; D Berry; M J Shildkraut
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 9.  Genetics: breast cancer as an exemplar.

Authors:  Rebekah Hamilton
Journal:  Nurs Clin North Am       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 1.208

10.  Predictive value of breast cancer cognitions and attitudes toward genetic testing on women's interest in genetic testing for breast cancer risk.

Authors:  Frauke Reitz; Jürgen Barth; Jürgen Bengel
Journal:  Psychosoc Med       Date:  2004-07-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.