Literature DB >> 31060048

Cases in Precision Medicine: Concerns About Privacy and Discrimination After Genomic Sequencing.

Deborah Stiles1, Paul S Appelbaum2.   

Abstract

Patients and research participants have indicated that privacy of their genetic test results is an important concern, particularly with respect to insurance coverage. Internists and other physicians whose patients ask about legal protections for information generated by genome sequencing for clinical purposes can provide both reassurance and caution. Protections for medical information in general, as well as laws in some states that provide additional safeguards for genetic data, should reassure patients that this information will remain private. Patients themselves will need to weigh the risks versus the benefits of generating genomic data in deciding whether to undergo exome sequencing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31060048      PMCID: PMC6715527          DOI: 10.7326/M18-2666

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-4819            Impact factor:   25.391


  12 in total

Review 1.  Global trends on fears and concerns of genetic discrimination: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Annet Wauters; Ine Van Hoyweghen
Journal:  J Hum Genet       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 3.172

2.  HIPAA Privacy Rule 2.0.

Authors:  Mark A Rothstein
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 1.718

3.  ASHG statement. Professional disclosure of familial genetic information. The American Society of Human Genetics Social Issues Subcommittee on Familial Disclosure.

Authors: 
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 11.025

4.  Genetic testing for susceptibility to breast cancer: findings from women's focus groups.

Authors:  I Tessaro; N Borstelmann; K Regan; B K Rimer; E Winer
Journal:  J Womens Health       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 2.681

5.  Undermining Genetic Privacy? Employee Wellness Programs and the Law.

Authors:  Kathy L Hudson; Karen Pollitz
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2017-05-24       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  How Should Primary Care Physicians Respond to Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Test Results?

Authors:  Kyle B Brothers; Esther E Knapp
Journal:  AMA J Ethics       Date:  2018-09-01

7.  Genetic diseases and the duty to disclose.

Authors:  Shawneequa Callier; Rachel Simpson
Journal:  Virtual Mentor       Date:  2012-08-01

8.  Attitudes and practices among internists concerning genetic testing.

Authors:  Robert Klitzman; Wendy Chung; Karen Marder; Anita Shanmugham; Lisa J Chin; Meredith Stark; Cheng-Shiun Leu; Paul S Appelbaum
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2012-05-15       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 9.  Reconsidering the duty to warn genetically at-risk relatives.

Authors:  Mark A Rothstein
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 8.822

10.  A systematic literature review of individuals' perspectives on privacy and genetic information in the United States.

Authors:  Ellen W Clayton; Colin M Halverson; Nila A Sathe; Bradley A Malin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-10-31       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Investigating acceptability of a training programme in precision medicine for frontline healthcare professionals: a mixed methods study.

Authors:  Sharon Mitchell; Evrim Jaccard; Felix Michael Schmitz; Elianne von Känel; Prune Collombet; Jacques Cornuz; Gérard Waeber; Idris Guessous; Sissel Guttormsen
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2022-07-19       Impact factor: 3.263

2.  Community Perspectives on Communicating About Precision Medicine in an Alaska Native Tribal Health Care System.

Authors:  R Brian Woodbury; Julie A Beans; Kyle A Wark; Paul Spicer; Vanessa Y Hiratsuka
Journal:  Front Commun (Lausanne)       Date:  2020-09-25

Review 3.  In vitro high-content tissue models to address precision medicine challenges.

Authors:  Samson Afewerki; Thiago Domingues Stocco; André Diniz Rosa da Silva; André Sales Aguiar Furtado; Gustavo Fernandes de Sousa; Guillermo U Ruiz-Esparza; Thomas J Webster; Fernanda R Marciano; Maria Strømme; Yu Shrike Zhang; Anderson Oliveira Lobo
Journal:  Mol Aspects Med       Date:  2022-08-17

4.  Sex-specific recombination patterns predict parent of origin for recurrent genomic disorders.

Authors:  Trenell J Mosley; H Richard Johnston; David J Cutler; Michael E Zwick; Jennifer G Mulle
Journal:  BMC Med Genomics       Date:  2021-06-09       Impact factor: 3.063

5.  Changing the mindset for precision medicine: from incentivized biobanking models to genomic data.

Authors:  Daniel Tigard
Journal:  Genet Res (Camb)       Date:  2019-10-31       Impact factor: 1.588

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.