Literature DB >> 17597387

Successful use of peer educators for sharing genetic information.

Vickie L Venne1, Heidi A Hamann.   

Abstract

This study examined the impact of a genetics education module provided by Reach to Recovery peer volunteers. Participants included 113 women with confirmed breast cancer diagnoses. Eighty-eight of these women (78%) completed a baseline survey, participated in a peer-led intervention, and completed a follow-up survey. Approximately half of the women received an education module that included a genetic component, while the other half did not. Results indicated that women who received the genetics module had greater increases in genetics knowledge than the group that did not receive the module. However, follow-up interest in genetic testing was not significantly different between the two groups. Results indicate that a peer-led genetics module can increase knowledge about genetics. However, it does not appear to have a differential effect on genetic testing interest.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17597387     DOI: 10.1007/s10897-007-9087-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Genet Couns        ISSN: 1059-7700            Impact factor:   2.537


  33 in total

1.  Dealing with diversity: recruiting churches and women for a randomized trial of mammography promotion.

Authors:  K P Derose; J Hawes-Dawson; S A Fox; N Maldonado; A Tatum; R Kington
Journal:  Health Educ Behav       Date:  2000-10

2.  Factors associated with decisions about clinical BRCA1/2 testing.

Authors:  K Armstrong; K Calzone; J Stopfer; G Fitzgerald; J Coyne; B Weber
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 4.254

3.  Participation in breast cancer susceptibility testing protocols: influence of recruitment source, altruism, and family involvement on women's decisions.

Authors:  G Geller; T Doksum; B A Bernhardt; S A Metz
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 4.254

4.  Nutritional concerns of women with breast cancer.

Authors:  S Monnin; M R Schiller; L Sachs; A M Smith
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.037

5.  Assessment and counseling for women with a family history of breast cancer. A guide for clinicians.

Authors:  K F Hoskins; J E Stopfer; K A Calzone; S D Merajver; T R Rebbeck; J E Garber; B L Weber
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1995-02-15       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Breast cancer risk assessment: use of complete pedigree information and the effect of misspecified ages at diagnosis of affected relatives.

Authors:  S Schmidt; H Becher; J Chang-Claude
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 4.132

7.  Controlled trial of pretest education approaches to enhance informed decision-making for BRCA1 gene testing.

Authors:  C Lerman; B Biesecker; J L Benkendorf; J Kerner; A Gomez-Caminero; C Hughes; M M Reed
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1997-01-15       Impact factor: 13.506

8.  Effect of a computer-based decision aid on knowledge, perceptions, and intentions about genetic testing for breast cancer susceptibility: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Michael J Green; Susan K Peterson; Maria Wagner Baker; Gregory R Harper; Lois C Friedman; Wendy S Rubinstein; David T Mauger
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2004-07-28       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Is survival among women diagnosed with breast cancer influenced by family history of breast cancer?

Authors:  M L Slattery; T D Berry; R A Kerber
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 4.822

10.  The Reach to Recovery program.

Authors:  M E Rinehart
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1994-07-01       Impact factor: 6.860

View more
  5 in total

1.  Development of Breast Cancer Choices: a decision support tool for young women with breast cancer deciding whether to have genetic testing for BRCA1/2 mutations.

Authors:  Chloe Grimmett; Charlotte Brooks; Alejandra Recio-Saucedo; Anne Armstrong; Ramsey I Cutress; D Gareth Evans; Ellen Copson; Lesley Turner; Bettina Meiser; Claire E Wakefield; Diana Eccles; Claire Foster
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2018-06-28       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  Bilingual approach to online cancer genetics education for Deaf American Sign Language users produces greater knowledge and confidence than English text only: A randomized study.

Authors:  Christina G S Palmer; Patrick Boudreault; Barbara A Berman; Alicia Wolfson; Lionel Duarte; Vickie L Venne; Janet S Sinsheimer
Journal:  Disabil Health J       Date:  2016-07-28       Impact factor: 2.554

Review 3.  Cancer genetic risk assessment for individuals at risk of familial breast cancer.

Authors:  Jennifer S Hilgart; Bernadette Coles; Rachel Iredale
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-02-15

4.  Implementation of interventions targeting the uptake of genetic testing services for breast cancer risk: protocol for a systematic review.

Authors:  Subash Thapa; Anja Leppin; Rikke Kristensen; Mette Just Bonde; Arja R Aro
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-06-28       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Improving comprehension of genetic counseling for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer clients with a visual tool.

Authors:  Muy-Kheng M Tea; Yen Y Tan; Christine Staudigl; Birgit Eibl; Romana Renz; Ella Asseryanis; Andreas Berger; Georg Pfeiler; Christian F Singer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-07-12       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.