Literature DB >> 21416261

Slow inbred lines of Drosophila melanogaster express as much inbreeding depression as fast inbred lines under semi-natural conditions.

Torsten Nygaard Kristensen1, Morten Ravn Knudsen, Volker Loeschcke.   

Abstract

Selection may reduce the deleterious consequences of inbreeding. This may be due to purging of recessive deleterious alleles or balancing selection favouring heterozygote offspring. Such selection is expected to be more efficient at slower compared to at faster rates of inbreeding. In this study we tested the impact of inbreeding and the rate of inbreeding on fitness related traits (egg productivity, egg-to-adult viability, developmental time and behaviour) under cold and benign semi-natural thermal conditions using Drosophila melanogaster as a model organism. We used non-inbred control and slow and fast inbred lines (both with an expected inbreeding level of 0.25). The results show that contrary to expectations the slow inbred lines do not maintain higher average fitness than the fast inbred lines. Furthermore, we found that stressful environmental conditions increased the level of inbreeding depression but the impact of inbreeding rate on the level of inbreeding depression was not affected by the environmental conditions. The results do not support the hypothesis that inbreeding depression is less severe with slow compared to fast rates of inbreeding and illustrate that although selection may be more efficient with slower rates of inbreeding this does not necessary lead to less inbreeding depression.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21416261     DOI: 10.1007/s10709-011-9563-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetica        ISSN: 0016-6707            Impact factor:   1.082


  45 in total

1.  SNPstream UHT: ultra-high throughput SNP genotyping for pharmacogenomics and drug discovery.

Authors:  Peter A Bell; Surendra Chaturvedi; Craig A Gelfand; Ching Yu Huang; Michael Kochersperger; Rafael Kopla; Frank Modica; Mark Pohl; Shobha Varde; Renbin Zhao; Xiaojian Zhao; Michael T Boyce-Jacino; Azzam Yassen
Journal:  Biotechniques       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 1.993

2.  Genome-wide analysis on inbreeding effects on gene expression in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Torsten Nygaard Kristensen; Peter Sørensen; Mogens Kruhøffer; Kamilla Sofie Pedersen; Volker Loeschcke
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-06-08       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  A simulation study on detecting purging of inbreeding depression in captive populations.

Authors:  Elizabeth Boakes; Jinliang Wang
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 1.588

4.  Ancestral inbreeding reduces the magnitude of inbreeding depression in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  William R Swindell; Juan L Bouzat
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 3.694

5.  Effects of stress and phenotypic variation on inbreeding depression in Brassica rapa.

Authors:  Donald M Waller; Jefferey Dole; Andrew J Bersch
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2008-01-14       Impact factor: 3.694

6.  Captive breeding and the reintroduction of Mexican and red wolves.

Authors:  P W Hedrick; R J Fredrickson
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 6.185

7.  Extreme temperatures increase the deleterious consequences of inbreeding under laboratory and semi-natural conditions.

Authors:  Torsten N Kristensen; J Stuart F Barker; Kamilla S Pedersen; Volker Loeschcke
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2008-09-07       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Efficiency of selection, as measured by single nucleotide polymorphism variation, is dependent on inbreeding rate in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Ditte Demontis; Cino Pertoldi; Volker Loeschcke; Karina Mikkelsen; Tomas Axelsson; Torsten Nygaard Kristensen
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2009-09-25       Impact factor: 6.185

9.  Laboratory selection experiments using Drosophila: what do they really tell us?

Authors: 
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 17.712

10.  Experimental evolution of the genetic load and its implications for the genetic basis of inbreeding depression.

Authors:  Charles W Fox; Kristy L Scheibly; David H Reed
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2008-06-28       Impact factor: 3.694

View more
  5 in total

1.  Seasonal stress drives predictable changes in inbreeding depression in field-tested captive populations of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Laramy S Enders; Leonard Nunney
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-06-20       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Detecting purging of inbreeding depression by a slow rate of inbreeding for various traits: the impact of environmental and experimental conditions.

Authors:  Jørgen Bundgaard; Volker Loeschcke; Mads Fristrup Schou; Kuke R Bijlsma
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2021-04-26       Impact factor: 3.832

3.  The effect of inbreeding rate on fitness, inbreeding depression and heterosis over a range of inbreeding coefficients.

Authors:  Nina Pekkala; K Emily Knott; Janne S Kotiaho; Kari Nissinen; Mikael Puurtinen
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2014-02-07       Impact factor: 5.183

4.  Sustained positive consequences of genetic rescue of fitness and behavioural traits in inbred populations of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Daniel Bang Jørgensen; Michael Ørsted; Torsten Nygaard Kristensen
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2022-05-09       Impact factor: 2.516

5.  Inbreeding rate modifies the dynamics of genetic load in small populations.

Authors:  Nina Pekkala; K Emily Knott; Janne S Kotiaho; Mikael Puurtinen
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2012-07-01       Impact factor: 2.912

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.