Literature DB >> 21624999

The relation between reproductive value and genetic contribution.

Nicholas H Barton1, Alison M Etheridge.   

Abstract

What determines the genetic contribution that an individual makes to future generations? With biparental reproduction, each individual leaves a "pedigree" of descendants, determined by the biparental relationships in the population. The pedigree of an individual constrains the lines of descent of each of its genes. An individual's reproductive value is the expected number of copies of each of its genes that is passed on to distant generations conditional on its pedigree. For the simplest model of biparental reproduction (analogous to the Wright-Fisher model), an individual's reproductive value is determined within ∼10 generations, independent of population size. Partial selfing and subdivision do not greatly slow this convergence. Our central result is that the probability that a gene will survive is proportional to the reproductive value of the individual that carries it and that, conditional on survival, after a few tens of generations, the distribution of the number of surviving copies is the same for all individuals, whatever their reproductive value. These results can be generalized to the joint distribution of surviving blocks of the ancestral genome. Selection on unlinked loci in the genetic background may greatly increase the variance in reproductive value, but the above results nevertheless still hold. The almost linear relationship between survival probability and reproductive value also holds for weakly favored alleles. Thus, the influence of the complex pedigree of descendants on an individual's genetic contribution to the population can be summarized through a single number: its reproductive value.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21624999      PMCID: PMC3176105          DOI: 10.1534/genetics.111.127555

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  15 in total

1.  On the genealogy of a population of biparental individuals.

Authors:  B Derrida; S C Manrubia; D H Zanette
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2000-04-07       Impact factor: 2.691

2.  Genetics of Natural Populations. VII. the Allelism of Lethals in the Third Chromosome of Drosophila Pseudoobscura.

Authors:  S Wright; T Dobzhansky; W Hovanitz
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1942-07       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Fixation of slightly beneficial mutations: effects of life history.

Authors:  Yngvild Vindenes; Aline Magdalena Lee; Steinar Engen; Bernt-Erik Saether
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2009-10-05       Impact factor: 3.694

4.  The use of matrices in calculating mendelian probabilities.

Authors:  C A Smith
Journal:  Ann Hum Genet       Date:  1976-07       Impact factor: 1.670

5.  The coalescent process with selfing.

Authors:  M Nordborg; P Donnelly
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Ancestral inbreeding only minimally affects inbreeding depression in mammalian populations.

Authors:  J D Ballou
Journal:  J Hered       Date:  1997 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.645

7.  Genealogical structure and correlations in gene extinction.

Authors:  E A Thompson
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  1979-10       Impact factor: 1.570

8.  Ancestral inference. I. The problem and the method.

Authors:  E A Thompson; C Cannings; M H Skolnick
Journal:  Ann Hum Genet       Date:  1978-07       Impact factor: 1.670

9.  Modelling the recent common ancestry of all living humans.

Authors:  Douglas L T Rohde; Steve Olson; Joseph T Chang
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-09-30       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  A theory of Fisher's reproductive value.

Authors:  Alan Grafen
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2006-04-24       Impact factor: 2.164

View more
  18 in total

1.  Gene genealogies within a fixed pedigree, and the robustness of Kingman's coalescent.

Authors:  John Wakeley; Léandra King; Bobbi S Low; Sohini Ramachandran
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2012-01-10       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Distribution of fixed beneficial mutations and the rate of adaptation in asexual populations.

Authors:  Benjamin H Good; Igor M Rouzine; Daniel J Balick; Oskar Hallatschek; Michael M Desai
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-02-27       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Ancestries of a recombining diploid population.

Authors:  R Sainudiin; B Thatte; A Véber
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2015-04-30       Impact factor: 2.259

4.  Understanding genetic changes between generations.

Authors:  Darren Hunter; Jon Slate
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-01-11       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  The lengths of admixture tracts.

Authors:  Mason Liang; Rasmus Nielsen
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2014-04-26       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Effects of the population pedigree on genetic signatures of historical demographic events.

Authors:  John Wakeley; Léandra King; Peter R Wilton
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-07-19       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  A Genealogical Look at Shared Ancestry on the X Chromosome.

Authors:  Vince Buffalo; Stephen M Mount; Graham Coop
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2016-06-29       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  The Price equation and reproductive value.

Authors:  Alan Grafen
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2020-03-09       Impact factor: 6.237

9.  Genealogical structure changes as range expansions transition from pushed to pulled.

Authors:  Gabriel Birzu; Oskar Hallatschek; Kirill S Korolev
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-08-24       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Allele frequency dynamics in a pedigreed natural population.

Authors:  Nancy Chen; Ivan Juric; Elissa J Cosgrove; Reed Bowman; John W Fitzpatrick; Stephan J Schoech; Andrew G Clark; Graham Coop
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-12-31       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.