Literature DB >> 29434337

Detection of genetic purging and predictive value of purging parameters estimated in pedigreed populations.

Eugenio López-Cortegano1, Diego Bersabé1, Jinliang Wang2, Aurora García-Dorado3.   

Abstract

The consequences of inbreeding for fitness are important in evolutionary and conservation biology, but can critically depend on genetic purging. However, estimating purging has proven elusive. Using PURGd software, we assess the performance of the Inbreeding-Purging (IP) model and of ancestral inbreeding (Fa) models to detect purging in simulated pedigreed populations, and to estimate parameters that allow reliably predicting the evolution of fitness under inbreeding. The power to detect purging in a single small population of size N is low for both models during the first few generations of inbreeding (t ≈ N/2), but increases for longer periods of slower inbreeding and is, on average, larger for the IP model. The ancestral inbreeding approach overestimates the rate of inbreeding depression during long inbreeding periods, and produces joint estimates of the effects of inbreeding and purging that lead to unreliable predictions for the evolution of fitness. The IP estimates of the rate of inbreeding depression become downwardly biased when obtained from long inbreeding processes. However, the effect of this bias is canceled out by a coupled downward bias in the estimate of the purging coefficient so that, unless the population is very small, the joint estimate of these two IP parameters yields good predictions of the evolution of mean fitness in populations of different sizes during periods of different lengths. Therefore, our results support the use of the IP model to detect inbreeding depression and purging, and to estimate reliable parameters for predictive purposes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29434337      PMCID: PMC5997712          DOI: 10.1038/s41437-017-0045-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)        ISSN: 0018-067X            Impact factor:   3.821


  32 in total

1.  Estimating selfing rates from reconstructed pedigrees using multilocus genotype data.

Authors:  Jinliang Wang; Yousry A El-Kassaby; Kermit Ritland
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2011-11-22       Impact factor: 6.185

2.  Understanding and predicting the fitness decline of shrunk populations: inbreeding, purging, mutation, and standard selection.

Authors:  Aurora García-Dorado
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2012-01-31       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Pedigrees or markers: Which are better in estimating relatedness and inbreeding coefficient?

Authors:  Jinliang Wang
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  2015-09-03       Impact factor: 1.570

4.  A simulation study on detecting purging of inbreeding depression in captive populations.

Authors:  Elizabeth Boakes; Jinliang Wang
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 1.588

5.  Shortcut predictions for fitness properties at the mutation-selection-drift balance and for its buildup after size reduction under different management strategies.

Authors:  Aurora García-Dorado
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2007-04-15       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 6.  Inferring purging from pedigree data.

Authors:  Davorka Gulisija; James F Crow
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 3.694

Review 7.  The genetics of inbreeding depression.

Authors:  Deborah Charlesworth; John H Willis
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 53.242

8.  Estimation of genetic purging under competitive conditions.

Authors:  Eugenio López-Cortegano; Ana Vilas; Armando Caballero; Aurora García-Dorado
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2016-07-05       Impact factor: 3.694

Review 9.  Genomics advances the study of inbreeding depression in the wild.

Authors:  Marty Kardos; Helen R Taylor; Hans Ellegren; Gordon Luikart; Fred W Allendorf
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2016-10-23       Impact factor: 5.183

10.  On the Consequences of Purging and Linkage on Fitness and Genetic Diversity.

Authors:  Diego Bersabé; Armando Caballero; Andrés Pérez-Figueroa; Aurora García-Dorado
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2015-11-12       Impact factor: 3.154

View more
  4 in total

1.  Nonequivalent lethal equivalents: Models and inbreeding metrics for unbiased estimation of inbreeding load.

Authors:  Pirmin Nietlisbach; Stefanie Muff; Jane M Reid; Michael C Whitlock; Lukas F Keller
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2018-10-23       Impact factor: 5.183

2.  A multivariate analysis with direct additive and inbreeding depression load effects.

Authors:  Luis Varona; Juan Altarriba; Carlos Moreno; María Martínez-Castillero; Joaquim Casellas
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2019-12-26       Impact factor: 4.297

3.  Inbreeding depression for kit survival at birth in a rabbit population under long-term selection.

Authors:  Ino Curik; György Kövér; János Farkas; Zsolt Szendrő; Róbert Romvári; Johann Sölkner; Istvan Nagy
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2020-07-08       Impact factor: 4.297

4.  Genetic purging in captive endangered ungulates with extremely low effective population sizes.

Authors:  Eugenio López-Cortegano; Eulalia Moreno; Aurora García-Dorado
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2021-09-28       Impact factor: 3.821

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.