Literature DB >> 9180048

Lexical neighborhood effects in phonetic processing.

R S Newman1, J R Sawusch, P A Luce.   

Abstract

Previous research on spoken word recognition has demonstrated that identification of a phonetic segment is affected by the lexical status of the item in which the segment occurs. W. F. Ganong (1980) demonstrated that a category boundary shift occurs when the voiced end of 1 voice-onset time continuum is a word but the voiceless end of another series is a word; this is known as the "lexical effect." A series of studies was undertaken to examine how lexical neighborhood; in contrast to lexical status, might influence word perception. Pairs of nonword series were created in which the voiced end of 1 series had a higher frequency-weighted neighborhood density, whereas the reverse was true for the other series. Lexical neighborhood was found to affect word recognition in much the same way as lexical status.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9180048     DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.23.3.873

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  17 in total

1.  Individual differences in language ability are related to variation in word recognition, not speech perception: evidence from eye movements.

Authors:  Bob McMurray; Cheyenne Munson; J Bruce Tomblin
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  Polling the effective neighborhoods of spoken words with the verbal transformation effect.

Authors:  James A Bashford; Richard M Warren; Peter W Lenz
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Do postonset segments define a lexical neighborhood?

Authors:  Rochelle S Newman; James R Sawusch; Paul A Luce
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2005-09

4.  The spread and density of the phonological neighborhood can strongly influence the verbal transformation illusion.

Authors:  James A Bashford; Richard M Warren; Peter W Lenz
Journal:  Proc Meet Acoust       Date:  2009-07-06

5.  Sizing up the competition: quantifying the influence of the mental lexicon on auditory and visual spoken word recognition.

Authors:  Julia F Strand; Mitchell S Sommers
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  A standard set of American-English voiced stop-consonant stimuli from morphed natural speech.

Authors:  Joseph D W Stephens; Lori L Holt
Journal:  Speech Commun       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 2.017

7.  Lexical mediation of phonotactic frequency effects on spoken word recognition: A Granger causality analysis of MRI-constrained MEG/EEG data.

Authors:  David W Gow; Bruna B Olson
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2015-07-01       Impact factor: 3.059

8.  Neural Systems Underlying Perceptual Adjustment to Non-Standard Speech Tokens.

Authors:  Emily B Myers; Laura M Mesite
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2014-10-01       Impact factor: 3.059

9.  Phonological and lexical effects in verbal recall by children with specific language impairments.

Authors:  Jeffry A Coady; Elina Mainela-Arnold; Julia L Evans
Journal:  Int J Lang Commun Disord       Date:  2013-02-08       Impact factor: 3.020

10.  The strength and time course of lexical activation of pronunciation variants.

Authors:  Mark A Pitt
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.332

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.