Literature DB >> 9153170

Comparison of two-dimensional vs three-dimensional camera systems in laparoscopic surgery.

A C Chan1, S C Chung, A P Yim, J Y Lau, E K Ng, A K Li.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The lack of depth perception and spatial orientation in video vision are the drawbacks of laparoscopic surgery. The advent of a three-dimensional camera system enables surgeons to regain binocular vision and may be advantageous in complex laparoscopic procedures.
METHODS: We prospectively studied two groups of surgeons (with and without experiences in laparoscopic surgery) who performed a designated standardized laparoscopic task using a two-dimensional camera system (Olympus OTV-S4) vs a three-dimensional camera system (Baxter-V. Mueller VS7700) and compared their time performances.
RESULTS: The results suggested that only experience in laparoscopic surgery had significant effect on individual's performance. We could not demonstrate any superiority of the 3D system over the 2D system. However, two-thirds of the surgeons commented that the depth perception did improve.
CONCLUSIONS: With further refinement of the technology, the 3D system may improve its potential in laparoscopic surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9153170     DOI: 10.1007/s004649900385

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  48 in total

1.  The effect of high-definition imaging on surgical task efficiency in minimally invasive surgery: an experimental comparison between three-dimensional imaging and direct vision through a stereoscopic TEM rectoscope.

Authors:  P van Bergen; W Kunert; G F Buess
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Understanding and optimizing laparoscopic videosystems.

Authors:  E Berber; A E Siperstein
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-05-02       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  [Comparative study of spatial imaging techniques in stereo-endoscopy].

Authors:  U D A Müller-Richter; A Limberger; P Weber; M Schilling
Journal:  Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir       Date:  2003-05-01

4.  The benefits of stereoscopic vision in robotic-assisted performance on bench models.

Authors:  Y Munz; K Moorthy; A Dosis; J D Hernandez; S Bann; F Bello; S Martin; A Darzi; T Rockall
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-02-02       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Dexterity enhancement with robotic surgery.

Authors:  K Moorthy; Y Munz; A Dosis; J Hernandez; S Martin; F Bello; T Rockall; A Darzi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-04-06       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 6.  Possibilities and limitations of current stereo-endoscopy.

Authors:  U D A Mueller-Richter; A Limberger; P Weber; K W Ruprecht; W Spitzer; M Schilling
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-04-27       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 7.  Seeing is believing: visualization systems in endoscopic surgery (video, HDTV, stereoscopy, and beyond).

Authors:  A Szold
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-03-11       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Distraction and proficiency in laparoscopy: 2D versus robotic console 3D immersion.

Authors:  Steven Kim; Audriene May; Heidi Ryan; Adnan Mohsin; Shawn Tsuda
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-04-13       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Impact of three-dimensional vision in laparoscopic training.

Authors:  Konstantinos Votanopoulos; F Charles Brunicardi; John Thornby; Charles F Bellows
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 10.  Three-dimensional thoracoscopic vertebral body replacement at the thoracolumbar junction.

Authors:  C Jacobs; M M Plöger; S Scheidt; P P Roessler; S Koob; K Kabir; C Jacobs; D C Wirtz; C Burger; R Pflugmacher; F Trommer
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2018-08-03       Impact factor: 1.154

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.