Literature DB >> 11443427

Understanding and optimizing laparoscopic videosystems.

E Berber1, A E Siperstein.   

Abstract

As tactile feedback and degree of freedom for instrument movement are restricted in laparoscopic surgery, the video image plays the most crucial role in giving the surgeon information about the performance of the operation. The development of small, reliable, high-resolution imaging systems is essential for the surgeon's acquisition detailed information about the tissues being manipulated. Image quality depends on each component of the laparoscopic imaging unit. In this context, it is crucial for the surgeon to have an understanding of how the video signal is formed, transmitted, and displayed. Moreover, the surgeon also needs to have an idea about the basic principles and specifications of the surgical video systems (i.e. charge-coupled device (CCD) camera, monitors, and digitizers). This knowledge is essential for choosing pieces of equipment and knowing how to assemble them into a functional operating suite. The aim of this review is to provide the surgeon with the basics of video signaling, and to familiarize him or her with the technical principles of the surgical video systems. An insight into the future of laparoscopic video systems also is made, and practical tips for improving image quality and troubleshooting are given throughout the article.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11443427     DOI: 10.1007/s004640000391

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  14 in total

1.  Use of microlaparoscopy in diagnostic procedures: a case report.

Authors:  S D Schwaitzberg
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc       Date:  1995-10

2.  Microendoscopic surgery: a comparison of four microendoscopes and a review of the literature.

Authors:  P N Fuller
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  Head-mounted video monitor for global visual access in mini-invasive surgery. An initial report.

Authors:  W P Geis
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Comparison of three-dimensional and two-dimensional laparoscopic video systems.

Authors:  E M McDougall; J J Soble; J S Wolf; S Y Nakada; O M Elashry; R V Clayman
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 2.942

5.  Comparison of laparoscopic imaging systems and conditions using a knot-tying task.

Authors:  F Tendick; S Bhoyrul; L W Way
Journal:  Comput Aided Surg       Date:  1997

6.  [Comparative study of endoscopic 2-D and 3-D imaging systems].

Authors:  P van Bergen; W Kunert; M O Schurr; G F Buess
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Chir Suppl Kongressbd       Date:  1996

7.  Individual assessment of visual perception by surgeons observing the same laparoscopic organs with various imaging systems.

Authors:  G Berci; S M Wren; S C Stain; J Peters; M Paz-Partlow
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  3-D imaging in gastrointestinal laparoscopy.

Authors:  D H Birkett
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1993 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 9.  State of the art of video technique for endoscopic surgery.

Authors:  T Lange
Journal:  Endosc Surg Allied Technol       Date:  1993-02

10.  Optical quality of the human eye.

Authors:  F W Campbell; R W Gubisch
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1966-10       Impact factor: 5.182

View more
  7 in total

1.  Evaluation of surgical performance with standard rigid and flexible-tip laparoscopes.

Authors:  J M Perrone; C D Ames; Y Yan; J Landman
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-07-14       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Video-assisted thoracic surgery--the past, present status and the future.

Authors:  Shi-ping Luh; Hui-ping Liu
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 3.066

Review 3.  Understanding and optimizing laparoscopic videosystems.

Authors:  H Rivas; R Cacchione; J W Allen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Telesurgery: windows of opportunity.

Authors:  Sulbha Arora; Gautam N Allahbadia
Journal:  Int J Health Sci (Qassim)       Date:  2007-01

Review 5.  VATS anatomic lung resections-the European experience.

Authors:  Sofina Begum; Henrik Jessen Hansen; Kostas Papagiannopoulos
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 6.  The Role of VATS in Lung Cancer Surgery: Current Status and Prospects for Development.

Authors:  Dariusz Dziedzic; Tadeusz Orlowski
Journal:  Minim Invasive Surg       Date:  2015-07-29

Review 7.  Getting started in endoscopic ear surgery.

Authors:  Peter Ryan; Carolina Wuesthoff; Nirmal Patel
Journal:  J Otol       Date:  2018-11-07
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.