Literature DB >> 30076428

Three-dimensional thoracoscopic vertebral body replacement at the thoracolumbar junction.

C Jacobs3, M M Plöger2, S Scheidt2, P P Roessler2, S Koob2, K Kabir2, C Jacobs3, D C Wirtz2, C Burger2, R Pflugmacher2, F Trommer4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim is to stabilize the thoracolumbar spine with a thoracoscopically implanted vertebral body replacement (VBR). To improve intraoperative depth perception and orientation, implantation is performed under three-dimensional (3D) thoracoscopic vision. INDICATIONS: Vertebral burst fractures at the thoracolumbar junction (A4 AOSpine classification), pseudarthrosis, and posttraumatic instability with increasing kyphosis. CONTRAINDICATIONS: Severe pulmonary dysfunctions, pulmonary or thoracic infections, previous thoracic surgery, and pulmonary adhesions. SURGICAL TECHNIQUE: The patient is lying in a right lateral decubitus position. Localization of the fractured vertebra. Minimally invasive transthoracic approach. Perform single lung ventilation and insert the 3D thoracoscope two intercostal spaces above the working portal. Utilization of special binocular glasses for 3D vision of the operation field and secure resection of the fractured vertebra. Measurement of the bony defect and insertion of the expandable cage. Control of correct cage position under fluoroscopy. Insertion of a chest tube and inflate the left lung. POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT: Chest × ray Remove chest tube when output is <500 ml/24 h Early mobilization on the ward 6 weeks no weight-bearing >5 kg
RESULTS: Between 2012 and 2017, 12 patients received a VBR under 3D thoracoscopic vision. After a mean follow up of 26 months, no cage dislocation was noticed and all patients recovered from the initial back pain. Complications were notable in two cases (17%) with a small pneumothorax after removal of the chest tube and postoperative pneumonia in one patient (8%). All responded to conservative treatment. Revision surgery was not necessary.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bony defect; Corporectomy; Expandable cage; Thoracolumbar spine; Vertebral burst fracture

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30076428     DOI: 10.1007/s00064-018-0559-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol        ISSN: 0934-6694            Impact factor:   1.154


  12 in total

1.  Anterior spinal fusion. The operative approach and pathological findings in 412 patients with Pott's disease of the spine.

Authors:  A R HODGSON; F E STOCK; H S FANG; G B ONG
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1960-09       Impact factor: 6.939

2.  Advanced stereoscopic projection technology significantly improves novice performance of minimally invasive surgical skills.

Authors:  R Smith; A Day; T Rockall; K Ballard; M Bailey; I Jourdan
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-01-11       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  From 2D to 3D: the future of surgery?

Authors:  Greta McLachlan
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2011-10-15       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  [Skills comparison using a 2D vs. 3D laparoscopic simulator].

Authors:  Sujey Romero-Loera; Luis Eduardo Cárdenas-Lailson; Florencio de la Concha-Bermejillo; Braulio Aaron Crisanto-Campos; Carlos Valenzuela-Salazar; Mucio Moreno-Portillo
Journal:  Cir Cir       Date:  2015-08-08       Impact factor: 0.361

5.  A randomized prospective study comparing acquisition of laparoscopic skills in three-dimensional (3D) vs. two-dimensional (2D) laparoscopy.

Authors:  B Alaraimi; W El Bakbak; S Sarker; S Makkiyah; A Al-Marzouq; R Goriparthi; A Bouhelal; V Quan; B Patel
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  2D vs. 3D imaging in laparoscopic surgery-results of a prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  Alexander Buia; Florian Stockhausen; Natalie Filmann; Ernst Hanisch
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2017-10-06       Impact factor: 3.445

7.  Three-dimensional video-endoscopy: clinical use in gynaecological laparoscopy.

Authors:  R Wenzl; R Lehner; U Vry; N Pateisky; P Sevelda; P Husslein
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1994-12-10       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 8.  [Fractures of the thoracolumbar spine. Late results of dorsal instrumentation and its consequences].

Authors:  C Knop; M Blauth; L Bastian; U Lange; J Kesting; H Tscherne
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 1.000

Review 9.  Thoracoscopic vertebral body replacement with an expandable cage after ventral spinal canal decompression.

Authors:  Brian T Ragel; Amin Amini; Meic H Schmidt
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 4.654

10.  AOSpine thoracolumbar spine injury classification system: fracture description, neurological status, and key modifiers.

Authors:  Alexander R Vaccaro; Cumhur Oner; Christopher K Kepler; Marcel Dvorak; Klaus Schnake; Carlo Bellabarba; Max Reinhold; Bizhan Aarabi; Frank Kandziora; Jens Chapman; Rajasekaran Shanmuganathan; Michael Fehlings; Luiz Vialle
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2013-11-01       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  1 in total

1.  Three-Dimensional Endoscopy-Assisted Excision and Reconstruction for Metastatic Disease of the Dorsal and Lumbar Spine: Early Results.

Authors:  Sergey Lyulin; Pavel Balaev; Koushik Narayan Subramanyam; Denis Ivliev; Abhishek Vasant Mundargi
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2022-02-15
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.