Literature DB >> 18495833

Licking and gaping elicited by microstimulation of the nucleus of the solitary tract.

Nicole R Kinzeler1, Susan P Travers.   

Abstract

Intraoral infusions of bitter tastants activate expression of the immediate-early gene c-Fos in neurons located in the medial third of the rostral nucleus of the solitary tract (rNST). The distribution of these neurons is distinct from that activated by sour or sweet stimuli. Bitter stimuli are also distinctive because of their potency for eliciting gaping, an oral reflex that functions to actively reject potentially toxic substances. Glossopharyngeal nerve transection profoundly reduces, whereas decerebration spares, the bitter-evoked Fos-like immunoreactivity (FLI) pattern and gaping, implicating the medial rNST as a substrate for the sensory limb of oral rejection. The present experiment tested this hypothesis using microstimulation (100 Hz, 0.2 ms, 5-40 microA) to activate the rNST in awake rats. NST microstimulation elicited licking and gaping, and gaping was evoked from a restricted rNST region. The results indicated some topographic organization in sites effective for evoking gaping, but, in direct conflict with the hypothesis, lateral sites farther from bitter-evoked FLI were more effective than medial sites centered closer to FLI-expressing neurons. The gape-effective sites resemble locations of bitter-responsive neurons recently observed in neurophysiological recordings. These results indicate that bitter-responsive rNST neurons critical for triggering gaping may not express FLI and imply an alternate function for bitter-responsive neurons that do.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18495833      PMCID: PMC2519929          DOI: 10.1152/ajpregu.00189.2008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol        ISSN: 0363-6119            Impact factor:   3.619


  69 in total

Review 1.  Which elements are excited in electrical stimulation of mammalian central nervous system: a review.

Authors:  J B Ranck
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1975-11-21       Impact factor: 3.252

2.  Intracranial self-stimulation at sites in the dorsal medulla oblongata.

Authors:  D A Carter; A G Phillips
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1975-08-22       Impact factor: 3.252

3.  Absolute behavioral taste thresholds in the rat.

Authors:  S D KOH; P TEITELBAUM
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1961-06

4.  Neural mechanism and possible role of inhibition of gastric motility induced by superior laryngeal afferents.

Authors:  Motoi Kobashi; Tomoshige Koga; Masatoshi Mizutani; Ryuji Matsuo
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.160

5.  Microstimulation of inferotemporal cortex influences face categorization.

Authors:  Seyed-Reza Afraz; Roozbeh Kiani; Hossein Esteky
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2006-07-26       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Gustatory terminal field organization and developmental plasticity in the nucleus of the solitary tract revealed through triple-fluorescence labeling.

Authors:  Olivia L May; David L Hill
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2006-08-01       Impact factor: 3.215

7.  Licking behavior: evidence of hypoglossal oscillator.

Authors:  Z Wiesenfeld; B P Halpern; D N Tapper
Journal:  Science       Date:  1977-06-03       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Impact of bitter taste on gastric motility.

Authors:  David Wicks; Jeff Wright; Pip Rayment; Robin Spiller
Journal:  Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 2.566

9.  The taste reactivity test. I. Mimetic responses to gustatory stimuli in neurologically normal rats.

Authors:  H J Grill; R Norgren
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1978-03-24       Impact factor: 3.252

10.  The taste reactivity test. II. Mimetic responses to gustatory stimuli in chronic thalamic and chronic decerebrate rats.

Authors:  H J Grill; R Norgren
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1978-03-24       Impact factor: 3.252

View more
  7 in total

1.  Local circuit input to the medullary reticular formation from the rostral nucleus of the solitary tract.

Authors:  J Nasse; D Terman; S Venugopal; G Hermann; R Rogers; J B Travers
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2008-08-20       Impact factor: 3.619

2.  Taste coding in the parabrachial nucleus of the pons in awake, freely licking rats and comparison with the nucleus of the solitary tract.

Authors:  Michael S Weiss; Jonathan D Victor; Patricia M Di Lorenzo
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-12-31       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  μ-Opioid modulation in the rostral solitary nucleus and reticular formation alters taste reactivity: evidence for a suppressive effect on consummatory behavior.

Authors:  Nicole R Kinzeler; Susan P Travers
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2011-06-22       Impact factor: 3.619

4.  Chemosensory processing in the taste - reward pathway.

Authors:  Ranier Gutierrez; Sidney A Simon
Journal:  Flavour Fragr J       Date:  2011-07-01       Impact factor: 2.576

5.  Nucleus of the solitary tract in the C57BL/6J mouse: Subnuclear parcellation, chorda tympani nerve projections, and brainstem connections.

Authors:  Donald Ganchrow; Judith R Ganchrow; Vanessa Cicchini; Dianna L Bartel; Daniel Kaufman; David Girard; Mark C Whitehead
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2014-05-01       Impact factor: 3.215

6.  Behavior and Fos activation reveal that male and female rats differentially assess affective valence during CTA learning and expression.

Authors:  Alyssa Bernanke; Elizabeth Burnette; Justine Murphy; Nathaniel Hernandez; Sara Zimmerman; Q David Walker; Rylee Wander; Samantha Sette; Zackery Reavis; Reynold Francis; Christopher Armstrong; Mary-Louise Risher; Cynthia Kuhn
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-12-13       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Statistical analysis and decoding of neural activity in the rodent geniculate ganglion using a metric-based inference system.

Authors:  Wei Wu; Thomas G Mast; Christopher Ziembko; Joseph M Breza; Robert J Contreras
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-30       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.