Literature DB >> 18087949

Eye movements and time-based selection: where do the eyes go in preview search?

Derrick G Watson1, Matthew Inglis.   

Abstract

In visual search tasks, presenting one set of distractors (previewing them) before a second set which contains the target, improves search efficiency compared to when all items appear simultaneously. It has been proposed that this preview benefit reflects an attentional bias against old information and toward new information. Here we tested directly whether there was such a bias by measuring eye movement behavior. The main findings were that fixations were biased against, and overall dwell times were shorter on, old stimuli during search in the preview condition. In addition, the initial onset of search was delayed in the preview condition and saccades made during the preview period did not disrupt the ability to prioritize new items. The data demonstrate directly that preview search results in an attentional bias toward new items and against old items.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18087949     DOI: 10.3758/bf03194111

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  18 in total

1.  Visual marking: evidence for inhibition using a probe-dot detection paradigm.

Authors:  D G Watson; G W Humphreys
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2000-04

2.  Visual marking beside the mark: prioritizing selection by abrupt onsets.

Authors:  M Donk; J Theeuwes
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2001-07

3.  Visual marking: selective attention to asynchronous temporal groups.

Authors:  Yuhong Jiang; Marvin M Chun; Lawrence E Marks
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Prioritization in visual search: visual marking is not dependent on a mnemonic search.

Authors:  Christian N L Olivers; Glyn W Humphreys; Dietmar Heinke; Adam C G Cooper
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2002-05

5.  Prioritizing selection of new elements: bottom-up versus top-down control.

Authors:  Mieke Donk; Jan Theeuwes
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2003-11

6.  Color-based grouping and inhibition in visual search: evidence from a probe detection analysis of preview search.

Authors:  Jason J Braithwaite; Glyn W Humphreys; Johan Hulleman
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2005-01

7.  Visual marking: the effects of irrelevant changes on preview search.

Authors:  Derrick G Watson; Glyn W Humphreys
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2005-04

8.  Visual marking of moving objects: a role for top-down feature-based inhibition in selection.

Authors:  D G Watson; G W Humphreys
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Visual marking: prioritizing selection for new objects by top-down attentional inhibition of old objects.

Authors:  D G Watson; G W Humphreys
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 8.934

10.  Eye movements during parallel-serial visual search.

Authors:  G J Zelinsky; D L Sheinberg
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 3.332

View more
  3 in total

1.  Attentional Capture to a Singleton Distractor Degrades Visual Marking in Visual Search.

Authors:  Kenji Yamauchi; Takayuki Osugi; Ikuya Murakami
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-05-16

2.  Perceptual grouping constrains inhibition in time-based visual selection.

Authors:  Zorana Zupan; Derrick G Watson
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Subset selective search on the basis of color and preview.

Authors:  Mieke Donk
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 2.199

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.