Literature DB >> 9062439

Quality of life of Danish women: population-based norms of the EORTC QLQ-C30.

M Klee1, M Groenvold, D Machin.   

Abstract

The aim of this was to derive population-based norms for women completing the EORTC QLQ-C30 version 1 which is designed for use with patients who have cancer. The study was conducted using two different questionnaires: one designed for use in female patients with breast cancer, the other for those with gynaecological cancers, but both including the EORTC QLQ-C30. The women were drawn from the Danish Central Population Register without knowledge of their health status and divided at random between the two questionnaires. All procedures for collecting data were identical. The response rate for those receiving the gynaecological cancer (GS) questionnaire was 49% and it was 71% for the breast cancer (BS) questionnaire. Detailed comparison between the two samples revealed several EORTC QLQ-C30 items showing a clear difference in distribution of scores between them. Because of this and the possible bias due to the relative low age-related response rate in GS, only the results from the BS are used for constructing norms. The norms cover all 30 single items on the EORTC QLQ-C30 and the nine derived scales, for women in four 10-year age groups commencing at 30 years and for those aged 70-75. Clear trends in, for example, declining ability to undertake strenuous activity are illustrated and quantified. Levels of certain symptoms, such as pain, are surprisingly high although it is recognized that the population sampled will contain a proportion of women with active disease including cancer. We recommend the use of these norms both as an aid to the clinical assessment of an individual patient, and to assist in the interpretation of clinical trial and longitudinal quality of life data. As a secondary result, we note that a population-based sample will have a lower response rate to a questionnaire with more questions, especially if many of these extra questions are on sexual issues.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9062439     DOI: 10.1023/a:1026461310761

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Life Res        ISSN: 0962-9343            Impact factor:   4.147


  10 in total

1.  Using data from studies of health-related quality of life to describe clinical issues examples from a longitudinal study of patients with advanced stages of cervical cancer.

Authors:  M Klee; M Groenvold; D Machin
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Validation of the EORTC QLQ-C30 quality of life questionnaire through combined qualitative and quantitative assessment of patient-observer agreement.

Authors:  M Groenvold; M C Klee; M A Sprangers; N K Aaronson
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 6.437

3.  [Sexology and epidemiologic methods. Description and analysis of a method of studying the sexual behavior, experience, knowledge and attitudes of women].

Authors:  I L Nielsen; G K Larsen; E Fog; J Kelstrup; I J Madsen; K Garde
Journal:  Ugeskr Laeger       Date:  1986-10-27

4.  Test for item bias in a quality of life questionnaire.

Authors:  M Groenvold; J B Bjorner; M C Klee; S Kreiner
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 6.437

5.  Short form 36 (SF36) health survey questionnaire: normative data for adults of working age.

Authors:  C Jenkinson; A Coulter; L Wright
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1993-05-29

6.  Underreporting by cancer patients: the case of response-shift.

Authors:  I S Breetvelt; F S Van Dam
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 4.634

7.  Sexuality among gynecologic cancer patients--a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  I Thranov; M Klee
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 5.482

8.  The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology.

Authors:  N K Aaronson; S Ahmedzai; B Bergman; M Bullinger; A Cull; N J Duez; A Filiberti; H Flechtner; S B Fleishman; J C de Haes
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1993-03-03       Impact factor: 13.506

9.  Population-based norms for the Mini-Mental State Examination by age and educational level.

Authors:  R M Crum; J C Anthony; S S Bassett; M F Folstein
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1993-05-12       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Swedish population norms for the GHRI, HI and STAI-state.

Authors:  C Forsberg; H Björvell
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 4.147

  10 in total
  29 in total

1.  Multiple chronic health problems are negatively associated with health related quality of life (HRQoL) irrespective of age.

Authors:  H Michelson; C Bolund; Y Brandberg
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  A randomised pilot of a self-help workbook intervention for breast cancer survivors.

Authors:  Lisa Beatty; Melissa Oxlad; Bogda Koczwara; Tracey D Wade
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2010-07-29       Impact factor: 3.603

3.  Uptake and adherence to an online intervention for cancer-related distress: older age is not a barrier to adherence but may be a barrier to uptake.

Authors:  Lisa Beatty; Emma Kemp; Claire Binnion; Jane Turner; Donna Milne; Phyllis Butow; Sylvie Lambert; Patsy Yates; Desmond Yip; Bogda Koczwara
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2017-02-02       Impact factor: 3.603

4.  Using data from studies of health-related quality of life to describe clinical issues examples from a longitudinal study of patients with advanced stages of cervical cancer.

Authors:  M Klee; M Groenvold; D Machin
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 4.147

5.  The effect of a multidimensional exercise intervention on physical capacity, well-being and quality of life in cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy.

Authors:  Lis Adamsen; Morten Quist; Julie Midtgaard; Christina Andersen; Tom Møller; Lasse Knutsen; Anders Tveterås; Mikael Rorth
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2005-08-12       Impact factor: 3.603

6.  Sexual functioning of people with rheumatoid arthritis: a multicenter study.

Authors:  Willy T M van Berlo; Harry B M van de Wiel; Erik Taal; Johannes J Rasker; Willibrord C M Weijmar Schultz; Martin H van Rijswijk
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2006-03-01       Impact factor: 2.980

7.  Quality of life in women following various surgeries of body manipulation: organ transplantation, mastectomy, and breast reconstruction.

Authors:  M Angeles Pérez-San-Gregorio; Eduardo Fernández-Jiménez; Agustín Martín-Rodríguez; Mercedes Borda-Más; M Esther Rincón-Fernández
Journal:  J Clin Psychol Med Settings       Date:  2013-09

8.  Social and psychological determinants of participation in internet-based cancer support groups.

Authors:  Mette Terp Høybye; Susanne Oksbjerg Dalton; Jane Christensen; Lone Ross; Katrin Gaardbo Kuhn; Christoffer Johansen
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2009-07-05       Impact factor: 3.603

9.  Content-based interpretation aids for health-related quality of life measures in clinical practice. An example for the visual function index (VF-14).

Authors:  J M Valderas; J Alonso; L Prieto; M Espallargues; X Castells
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 4.147

10.  Effect of a multimodal high intensity exercise intervention in cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy: randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Lis Adamsen; Morten Quist; Christina Andersen; Tom Møller; Jørn Herrstedt; Dorte Kronborg; Marie T Baadsgaard; Kirsten Vistisen; Julie Midtgaard; Birgitte Christiansen; Maria Stage; Morten T Kronborg; Mikael Rørth
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2009-10-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.