PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of a self-help workbook for improving adjustment for breast cancer survivors. METHODS: An RCT compared the workbook (n = 20) with no-workbook controls (n = 20). Coping, traumatic stress and quality of life were measured at baseline, then 3 and 6 months later. RESULTS: No interactions were found. A significant group main effect was found for venting coping; controls used less venting coping than workbook participants (p = 0.034). A significant time main effect was obtained for cognitive functioning (p = 0.003). Reliable change indices showed a trend towards a protective effect across all coping measures for workbook participants compared to controls. Qualitative feedback suggested that participants felt well supported by the intervention, but would have preferred receiving it during treatment. CONCLUSIONS: While trends showed some promise for improving coping, endorsement for the workbook was not obtained. The difficulties encountered in recruiting survivors and the resulting implications regarding the feasibility of offering self-help resources to this population are discussed.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of a self-help workbook for improving adjustment for breast cancer survivors. METHODS: An RCT compared the workbook (n = 20) with no-workbook controls (n = 20). Coping, traumatic stress and quality of life were measured at baseline, then 3 and 6 months later. RESULTS: No interactions were found. A significant group main effect was found for venting coping; controls used less venting coping than workbook participants (p = 0.034). A significant time main effect was obtained for cognitive functioning (p = 0.003). Reliable change indices showed a trend towards a protective effect across all coping measures for workbook participants compared to controls. Qualitative feedback suggested that participants felt well supported by the intervention, but would have preferred receiving it during treatment. CONCLUSIONS: While trends showed some promise for improving coping, endorsement for the workbook was not obtained. The difficulties encountered in recruiting survivors and the resulting implications regarding the feasibility of offering self-help resources to this population are discussed.
Authors: Heidi E Stiegelis; Mariët Hagedoorn; Robbert Sanderman; Femke T C Bennenbroek; Bram P Buunk; Alfons C M van den Bergh; Gerrit Botke; Adelita V Ranchor Journal: Psychooncology Date: 2004-04 Impact factor: 3.894
Authors: A L Stanton; S Danoff-Burg; C L Cameron; M Bishop; C A Collins; S B Kirk; L A Sworowski; R Twillman Journal: J Consult Clin Psychol Date: 2000-10
Authors: Karyn L Angell; Mary Anne Kreshka; Rebecca McCoy; Patricia Donnelly; Julie M Turner-Cobb; Kathy Graddy; Helena C Kraemer; Cheryl Koopman Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2003-07 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Sylvie D Lambert; Afaf Girgis; Jane Turner; Tim Regan; Hayley Candler; Ben Britton; Suzanne Chambers; Catalina Lawsin; Karen Kayser Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2013-08-17 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Sylvie D Lambert; Afaf Girgis; Patrick McElduff; Jane Turner; Janelle V Levesque; Karen Kayser; Cathrine Mihalopoulos; Sophy T F Shih; Daniel Barker Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2013-07-24 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Ilaria Durosini; Stefano Triberti; Lucrezia Savioni; Valeria Sebri; Gabriella Pravettoni Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-10-04 Impact factor: 4.614
Authors: Charlene J Treanor; Una C McMenamin; Roisin F O'Neill; Chris R Cardwell; Mike J Clarke; Marie Cantwell; Michael Donnelly Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2016-08-16