Literature DB >> 10855347

Using data from studies of health-related quality of life to describe clinical issues examples from a longitudinal study of patients with advanced stages of cervical cancer.

M Klee1, M Groenvold, D Machin.   

Abstract

The focus of the paper is to describe how to present data from studies on health-related quality of life (H-QoL) in a way that is simple and clinically relevant. Data from a longitudinal study of patients with advanced stages of cervix cancer are used. One hundred and eighteen patients filled out questionnaires (including EORTC QLQ-C30) 7 times over a period of 2 years. The following issues are considered: (1) The use of a panel for an initial overview of data. (2) The visual difference between using mean and median values. (3) Box-whisker plots to illustrate the variability of the data. (4) The effect of combining categorical data into fewer categories. (5) Individual patient profiles showing the wide variability among patients. (6) A table showing the change of scores over a one-year period. (7) "Prognostic plots" dividing the initial scores and the following scores. (8) Plotting changes over time. (9) Illustration of the impact of non-random dropout. (10) The effect of drop-out for the patients who fill out two sequential assessments. (11) The use of healthy controls to help answer the question "what is normal?".

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10855347     DOI: 10.1023/a:1008903818379

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Life Res        ISSN: 0962-9343            Impact factor:   4.147


  17 in total

Review 1.  Quality of life: a dynamic construct.

Authors:  P J Allison; D Locker; J S Feine
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 4.634

Review 2.  Guidelines for reporting results of quality of life assessments in clinical trials.

Authors:  M Staquet; R Berzon; D Osoba; D Machin
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  Validation of the EORTC QLQ-C30 quality of life questionnaire through combined qualitative and quantitative assessment of patient-observer agreement.

Authors:  M Groenvold; M C Klee; M A Sprangers; N K Aaronson
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 6.437

4.  Test for item bias in a quality of life questionnaire.

Authors:  M Groenvold; J B Bjorner; M C Klee; S Kreiner
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 6.437

Review 5.  Suggestions for the presentation of quality of life data from clinical trials.

Authors:  D Machin; S Weeden
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1998 Mar 15-Apr 15       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 6.  The role of information in patients' adaptation to chemotherapy and radiotherapy: a review of the literature.

Authors:  E Ream; A Richardson
Journal:  Eur J Cancer Care (Engl)       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 2.520

7.  Quality of life of women with ovarian cancer.

Authors:  A B Kornblith; H T Thaler; G Wong; V Vlamis; J M Lepore; D B Loseth; T Hakes; W J Hoskins; R K Portenoy
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 5.482

8.  The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer. Approach to quality of life assessment: guidelines for developing questionnaire modules. EORTC Study Group on Quality of Life.

Authors:  M A Sprangers; A Cull; K Bjordal; M Groenvold; N K Aaronson
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 4.147

9.  The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology.

Authors:  N K Aaronson; S Ahmedzai; B Bergman; M Bullinger; A Cull; N J Duez; A Filiberti; H Flechtner; S B Fleishman; J C de Haes
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1993-03-03       Impact factor: 13.506

10.  Monitoring dialysis patients' health status.

Authors:  K B Meyer; D M Espindle; J M DeGiacomo; C S Jenuleson; P S Kurtin; A R Davies
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 8.860

View more
  5 in total

1.  Adjusting distributions of the Health Utilities Index Mark 3 utility scores of health-related quality of life.

Authors:  Jian Sun
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Quality of life of Danish women: population-based norms of the EORTC QLQ-C30.

Authors:  M Klee; M Groenvold; D Machin
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  Using individual growth model to analyze the change in quality of life from adolescence to adulthood.

Authors:  Henian Chen; Patricia Cohen
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2006-02-21       Impact factor: 3.186

4.  Validation of the Danish version of the disease specific instrument EORTC QLQ-CR38 to assess health-related quality of life in patients with colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Henriette Vind Thaysen; P Jess; Søren Laurberg; M Groenvold
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2012-12-14       Impact factor: 3.186

5.  A randomised controlled trial of hospital-based case management to improve colorectal cancer patients' health-related quality of life and evaluations of care.

Authors:  Christian Nielsen Wulff; Peter Vedsted; Jens Søndergaard
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 2.692

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.