Literature DB >> 2047902

Underreporting by cancer patients: the case of response-shift.

I S Breetvelt1, F S Van Dam.   

Abstract

There are a lot of studies in which self-report questionnaires are used, showing that cancer patients do not have a lower quality of life than the normal healthy population. This seems to be in contrast with the results of studies in which more extensive interviews have been used and to the everyday experience of physicians, nurses and other caretakers. This phenomenon of underreporting seems to hold true also for other patient groups. Judgment theories explain how the perception of quality of life arises. These theories indicate how the conceptualization of the dimension to be measured, changes under the influence of a (highly significant) life event, such as getting a life threatening disease. These theories hold that there will be a concurrent change in the internalized standard on which the patients base their perception. Thus a real effect, for example a decrease in quality of life as a result of cancer, can be obscured totally. Until an empirically proven solution to this problem has been found, we recommend that answers in questionnaires concerned with quality of life, psychological distress and the like should be approached with due caution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2047902     DOI: 10.1016/0277-9536(91)90156-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  59 in total

1.  The importance of social comparisons for high levels of subjective quality of life in chronic schizophrenic patients.

Authors:  M Franz; T Meyer; T Reber; B Gallhofer
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Responsiveness of the EuroQol in breast cancer patients undergoing high dose chemotherapy.

Authors:  B Conner-Spady; C Cumming; J M Nabholtz; P Jacobs; D Stewart
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  Cancer as biographical disruption: constructions of living with cancer.

Authors:  Gill Hubbard; Liz Forbat
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2011-11-11       Impact factor: 3.603

4.  Quality-of-life assessment in cancer.

Authors:  F S van Dam; J Sternswärd
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 4.981

5.  Longitudinal assessment of parental satisfaction with children's psychiatric hospitalization.

Authors:  Joseph C Blader
Journal:  Adm Policy Ment Health       Date:  2007-03

6.  Change in quality of life of people with stroke over time: true change or response shift?

Authors:  Sara Ahmed; Nancy E Mayo; Marc Corbiere; Sharon Wood-Dauphinee; James Hanley; Robin Cohen
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 4.147

7.  The effects of response bias on self-reported quality of life among childhood cancer survivors.

Authors:  Tara E O'Leary; Lisa Diller; Christopher J Recklitis
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2007-07-11       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 8.  Quality of life in survivors of childhood cancer: a systematic review of the literature (2001-2008).

Authors:  Janette McDougall; Miranda Tsonis
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2009-06-02       Impact factor: 3.603

9.  Exploring response shift in the quality of life of healthy adolescents over 1 year.

Authors:  Fiona Gillison; Suzanne Skevington; Martyn Standage
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2008-07-17       Impact factor: 4.147

10.  Measuring quality of life in pediatric palliative care: challenges and potential solutions.

Authors:  I-Chan Huang; Elizabeth A Shenkman; Vanessa L Madden; Susan Vadaparampil; Gwendolyn Quinn; Caprice A Knapp
Journal:  Palliat Med       Date:  2009-12-10       Impact factor: 4.762

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.