Literature DB >> 9061963

Hearing and bat defence in geometrid winter moths.

J Rydell1, N Skals, A Surlykke, M Svensson.   

Abstract

Audiograms and behavioural responses to ultrasound reveal that male geometrid winter moths (Agriopis and Erannis spp.; Ennominae, and Alsophila aescularia; Oenochrominae), which have large wings and a slow flight, have good, broadly tuned ultrasonic hearing with best frequencies at 25-40 kHz, coinciding with the frequencies used by most sympatric aerial-hawking bats. Ultrasonic pulses (27 kHz 110 dB at 1 m) delivered at distances of 1-12 m evoked consistent reactions of free flying, male A. marginaria in the lab as well as in the field; those at < 5 m resulted in the moth spiralling or diving towards the ground, those at 5-12 m resulted in one or several changes in the flight path, but did not end on the ground. The differential reaction probably reflects whether the moth is likely to have been detected by the bat or not. The micropterous (and flightless), and hence cryptic, females have strongly reduced tympanic organs and are virtually deaf. Sexual dimorphism in hearing and behavioural reactions to ultrasound reflect differential natural selection on males and females by bats. Natural selection on the hearing of the males thus seems to occur although they fly in late autumn and early spring, when bat activity is much reduced.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9061963      PMCID: PMC1688226          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.1997.0012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  4 in total

1.  Responses of the less sensitive acoustic sense cells in the tympanic organs of some noctuid and geometrid moths.

Authors:  K D Roeder
Journal:  J Insect Physiol       Date:  1974-01       Impact factor: 2.354

2.  Measurements of atmospheric attenuation at ultrasonic frequencies and the significance for echolocation by bats.

Authors:  B D Lawrence; J A Simmons
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1982-03       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Flight of Winter Moths Near 0{degrees}C.

Authors:  B Heinrich; T P Mommsen
Journal:  Science       Date:  1985-04-12       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Echolocation call structure and intensity in five species of insectivorous bats.

Authors:  D A Waters; G Jones
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 3.312

  4 in total
  15 in total

1.  Day-flying butterflies remain day-flying in a Polynesian, bat-free habitat.

Authors:  J H Fullard
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2000-11-22       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Auditory-evoked evasive manoeuvres in free-flying locusts and moths.

Authors:  J W Dawson; W Kutsch; R M Robertson
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2003-12-04       Impact factor: 1.836

3.  Auditory sensitivity and ecological relevance: the functional audiogram as modelled by the bat detecting moth ear.

Authors:  Matthew E Jackson; Navdeep S Asi; James H Fullard
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2010-05-07       Impact factor: 1.836

4.  Hearing diversity in moths confronting a neotropical bat assemblage.

Authors:  Ariadna Cobo-Cuan; Manfred Kössl; Emanuel C Mora
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2017-04-18       Impact factor: 1.836

Review 5.  Moth hearing and sound communication.

Authors:  Ryo Nakano; Takuma Takanashi; Annemarie Surlykke
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2014-09-27       Impact factor: 1.836

6.  Persistence of bat defence reactions in high Arctic moths (Lepidoptera).

Authors:  J Rydell; H Roininen; K W Philip
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2000-03-22       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Evasive response to ultrasound by the crepuscular butterfly Manataria maculata.

Authors:  Jens Rydell; Sirje Kaerma; Henrik Hedelin; Niels Skals
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2003-01-10

8.  Bat defence in lekking ghost swifts (Hepialus humuli), a moth without ultrasonic hearing.

Authors:  J Rydell
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1998-08-07       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Listening in pheromone plumes: disruption of olfactory-guided mate attraction in a moth by a bat-like ultrasound.

Authors:  Glenn P Svenssona; Christer Löfstedt; Niels Skals
Journal:  J Insect Sci       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 1.857

10.  Light-emitting diode street lights reduce last-ditch evasive manoeuvres by moths to bat echolocation calls.

Authors:  Andrew Wakefield; Emma L Stone; Gareth Jones; Stephen Harris
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2015-08-05       Impact factor: 2.963

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.