Literature DB >> 25261361

Moth hearing and sound communication.

Ryo Nakano1, Takuma Takanashi, Annemarie Surlykke.   

Abstract

Active echolocation enables bats to orient and hunt the night sky for insects. As a counter-measure against the severe predation pressure many nocturnal insects have evolved ears sensitive to ultrasonic bat calls. In moths bat-detection was the principal purpose of hearing, as evidenced by comparable hearing physiology with best sensitivity in the bat echolocation range, 20-60 kHz, across moths in spite of diverse ear morphology. Some eared moths subsequently developed sound-producing organs to warn/startle/jam attacking bats and/or to communicate intraspecifically with sound. Not only the sounds for interaction with bats, but also mating signals are within the frequency range where bats echolocate, indicating that sound communication developed after hearing by "sensory exploitation". Recent findings on moth sound communication reveal that close-range (~ a few cm) communication with low-intensity ultrasounds "whispered" by males during courtship is not uncommon, contrary to the general notion of moths predominantly being silent. Sexual sound communication in moths may apply to many eared moths, perhaps even a majority. The low intensities and high frequencies explain that this was overlooked, revealing a bias towards what humans can sense, when studying (acoustic) communication in animals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25261361     DOI: 10.1007/s00359-014-0945-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol        ISSN: 0340-7594            Impact factor:   1.836


  34 in total

1.  How evolutionary history shapes recognition mechanisms.

Authors:  M J. Ryan; S M. Phelps; A S. Rand
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2001-04-01       Impact factor: 20.229

2.  Tympanal and atympanal 'mouth-ears' in hawkmoths (Sphingidae).

Authors:  Martin C Göpfert; Annemarie Surlykke; Lutz T Wasserthal
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2002-01-07       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Hearing and bat defence in geometrid winter moths.

Authors:  J Rydell; N Skals; A Surlykke; M Svensson
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1997-01-22       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Convergent evolution of anti-bat sounds.

Authors:  Aaron J Corcoran; Nickolay I Hristov
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2014-07-01       Impact factor: 1.836

5.  Sonar jamming in the field: effectiveness and behavior of a unique prey defense.

Authors:  Aaron J Corcoran; William E Conner
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2012-12-15       Impact factor: 3.312

6.  Tiger moth jams bat sonar.

Authors:  Aaron J Corcoran; Jesse R Barber; William E Conner
Journal:  Science       Date:  2009-07-17       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Ultrasonic courtship song in the Asian corn borer moth, Ostrinia furnacalis.

Authors:  Ryo Nakano; Yukio Ishikawa; Sadahiro Tatsuki; Annemarie Surlykke; Niels Skals; Takuma Takanashi
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2006-03-16

8.  Tiger moths and the threat of bats: decision-making based on the activity of a single sensory neuron.

Authors:  John M Ratcliffe; James H Fullard; Benjamin J Arthur; Ronald R Hoy
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2009-03-25       Impact factor: 3.703

9.  Acoustic feature recognition in the dogbane tiger moth, Cycnia tenera.

Authors:  James H Fullard; John M Ratcliffe; Christopher G Christie
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 3.312

10.  'Un chant d'appel amoureux': acoustic communication in moths

Authors: 
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 3.312

View more
  6 in total

1.  Insect hearing: from physics to ecology.

Authors:  Bernhard Ronacher; Heiner Römer
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2014-11-21       Impact factor: 1.836

2.  Hearing diversity in moths confronting a neotropical bat assemblage.

Authors:  Ariadna Cobo-Cuan; Manfred Kössl; Emanuel C Mora
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2017-04-18       Impact factor: 1.836

3.  Anti-bat ultrasound production in moths is globally and phylogenetically widespread.

Authors:  Jesse R Barber; David Plotkin; Juliette J Rubin; Nicholas T Homziak; Brian C Leavell; Peter R Houlihan; Krystie A Miner; Jesse W Breinholt; Brandt Quirk-Royal; Pablo Sebastián Padrón; Matias Nunez; Akito Y Kawahara
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-06-15       Impact factor: 12.779

4.  Twittering Pupae of Papilionid and Nymphalid Butterflies (Lepidoptera): Novel Structures and Sounds.

Authors:  Patrick Dolle; Philipp Klein; Ottmar W Fischer; Hans-Ulrich Schnitzler; Lawrence E Gilbert; Michael Boppré
Journal:  Ann Entomol Soc Am       Date:  2018-08-23       Impact factor: 2.099

5.  Extreme Duty Cycles in the Acoustic Signals of Tiger Moths: Sexual and Natural Selection Operating in Parallel.

Authors:  Y Fernández; N J Dowdy; W E Conner
Journal:  Integr Org Biol       Date:  2021-01-05

6.  Discriminating predation attempt outcomes during natural foraging using the post-buzz pause in the Japanese large-footed bat, Myotis macrodactylus.

Authors:  Yuuka Mizuguchi; Emyo Fujioka; Olga Heim; Dai Fukui; Shizuko Hiryu
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2022-04-04       Impact factor: 3.308

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.