Literature DB >> 28421281

Hearing diversity in moths confronting a neotropical bat assemblage.

Ariadna Cobo-Cuan1,2, Manfred Kössl3, Emanuel C Mora4.   

Abstract

The tympanal ear is an evolutionary acquisition which helps moths survive predation from bats. The greater diversity of bats and echolocation strategies in the Neotropics compared with temperate zones would be expected to impose different sensory requirements on the neotropical moths. However, even given some variability among moth assemblages, the frequencies of best hearing of moths from different climate zones studied to date have been roughly the same: between 20 and 60 kHz. We have analyzed the auditory characteristics of tympanate moths from Cuba, a neotropical island with high levels of bat diversity and a high incidence of echolocation frequencies above those commonly at the upper limit of moths' hearing sensitivity. Moths of the superfamilies Noctuoidea, Geometroidea and Pyraloidea were examined. Audiograms were determined by non-invasively measuring distortion-product otoacoustic emissions. We also quantified the frequency spectrum of the echolocation sounds to which this moth community is exposed. The hearing ranges of moths in our study showed best frequencies between 36 and 94 kHz. High sensitivity to frequencies above 50 kHz suggests that the auditory sensitivity of moths is suited to the sounds used by sympatric echolocating bat fauna. Biodiversity characterizes predators and prey in the Neotropics, but the bat-moth acoustic interaction keeps spectrally matched.

Keywords:  Bat; DPOAEs; Echolocation assemblage; Hearing; Moth

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28421281     DOI: 10.1007/s00359-017-1170-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol        ISSN: 0340-7594            Impact factor:   1.836


  29 in total

1.  Auditory-evoked evasive manoeuvres in free-flying locusts and moths.

Authors:  J W Dawson; W Kutsch; R M Robertson
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2003-12-04       Impact factor: 1.836

2.  Ultrasonic reception by the tympanic organ of noctuid moths.

Authors:  K D ROEDER; A E TREAT
Journal:  J Exp Zool       Date:  1957-02

3.  Comparison between distortion product otoacoustic emissions and nerve fiber responses from the basilar papilla of the frog.

Authors:  Sebastiaan W F Meenderink; Pim van Dijk; Peter M Narins
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 4.  Otoacoustic emissions from insect ears: evidence of active hearing?

Authors:  Manfred Kössl; Doreen Möckel; Melanie Weber; Ernst-August Seyfarth
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2008-05-31       Impact factor: 1.836

5.  Hearing and bat defence in geometrid winter moths.

Authors:  J Rydell; N Skals; A Surlykke; M Svensson
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1997-01-22       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Unexpected dynamic up-tuning of auditory organs in day-flying moths.

Authors:  Emanuel C Mora; Ariadna Cobo-Cuan; Frank Macías-Escrivá; Manfred Kössl
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2015-04-19       Impact factor: 1.836

7.  Tiger moth jams bat sonar.

Authors:  Aaron J Corcoran; Jesse R Barber; William E Conner
Journal:  Science       Date:  2009-07-17       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Tiger moths and the threat of bats: decision-making based on the activity of a single sensory neuron.

Authors:  John M Ratcliffe; James H Fullard; Benjamin J Arthur; Ronald R Hoy
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2009-03-25       Impact factor: 3.703

9.  'Un chant d'appel amoureux': acoustic communication in moths

Authors: 
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 3.312

10.  SOUND PRODUCTION AND HEARING IN THE PYRALID MOTH SYMMORACMA MINORALIS

Authors: 
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 3.312

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.