Literature DB >> 14655020

Auditory-evoked evasive manoeuvres in free-flying locusts and moths.

J W Dawson1, W Kutsch, R M Robertson.   

Abstract

We presented free-flying locusts (Locusta migratoria L.) with sounds that varied in temporal structure and carrier frequency as they flew toward a light source in a flight room under controlled temperature and light conditions. Previous studies have shown tethered locusts react more often to trains of 30-kHz pulses than to pulse trains below 10 kHz. Further, this acoustic startle response has been suggested to function in bat-avoidance. We expected free-flying locusts to respond similarly; however, we found locusts responded to all sounds we presented, not just high-frequency, "bat-like" sounds. Response rates of turns, loops, and dives varied from 6% to 26% but were statistically independent of carrier frequency and/or pulse structure. Free-flying moths and tethered locusts were tested using a subset of our acoustic stimuli under the same temperature and light conditions as the free-flying locusts. Moth responses were carrier frequency dependent as were responses of tethered locusts positioned along the flight path observed in our free-flight trials. All responses were unaffected by a 90% reduction in room light. We conclude that locusts possess an acoustic startle response evocable in free flight, however, free-flying locusts do not show the same discrimination observed in tethered locusts under similar conditions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14655020     DOI: 10.1007/s00359-003-0474-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol        ISSN: 0340-7594            Impact factor:   1.836


  23 in total

1.  Ultrasonic hearing in nocturnal butterflies.

Authors:  J E Yack; J H Fullard
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-01-20       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Tympanal hearing in insects.

Authors:  R R Hoy; D Robert
Journal:  Annu Rev Entomol       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 19.686

Review 3.  Startle, categorical response, and attention in acoustic behavior of insects.

Authors:  R R Hoy
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 12.449

4.  Hearing and bat defence in geometrid winter moths.

Authors:  J Rydell; N Skals; A Surlykke; M Svensson
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1997-01-22       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  POPULATION SYNCHRONY IN MAYFLIES: A PREDATOR SATIATION HYPOTHESIS.

Authors:  Bernard W Sweeney; Robin L Vannote
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1982-07       Impact factor: 3.694

6.  Mercury vapour lamps interfere with the bat defence of tympanate moths (Operophtera spp.; Geometridae)

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 2.844

7.  Echolocation and pursuit of prey by bats.

Authors:  J A Simmons; M B Fenton; M J O'Farrell
Journal:  Science       Date:  1979-01-05       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Normal hearing thresholds for clicks.

Authors:  D R Stapells; T W Picton; A D Smith
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1982-07       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Ultrasound-triggered, flight-gated evasive maneuvers in the praying mantis Parasphendale agrionina. II. Tethered flight.

Authors:  D D Yager; M L May
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 3.312

10.  Behavioral response to ultrasound by the tiger beetle Cicindela marutha dow combines aerodynamic changes and sound production.

Authors:  D D Yager; H G Spangler
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 3.312

View more
  7 in total

1.  Gliding behaviour elicited by lateral looming stimuli in flying locusts.

Authors:  Roger D Santer; Peter J Simmons; F Claire Rind
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2004-11-19       Impact factor: 1.836

2.  Evolutionarily conserved coding properties of auditory neurons across grasshopper species.

Authors:  Daniela Neuhofer; Sandra Wohlgemuth; Andreas Stumpner; Bernhard Ronacher
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2008-09-07       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Hearing diversity in moths confronting a neotropical bat assemblage.

Authors:  Ariadna Cobo-Cuan; Manfred Kössl; Emanuel C Mora
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2017-04-18       Impact factor: 1.836

4.  Responses of a pair of flying locusts to lateral looming visual stimuli.

Authors:  Indika Benaragama; John R Gray
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2014-05-10       Impact factor: 1.836

5.  Acoustic startle/escape reactions in tethered flying locusts: motor patterns and wing kinematics underlying intentional steering.

Authors:  J W Dawson; F-H Leung; R M Robertson
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2004-04-29       Impact factor: 1.836

6.  Early erratic flight response of the lucerne moth to the quiet echolocation calls of distant bats.

Authors:  Ryo Nakano; Andrew C Mason
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-08-20       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Acoustic Aposematism and Evasive Action in Select Chemically Defended Arctiine (Lepidoptera: Erebidae) Species: Nonchalant or Not?

Authors:  Nicolas J Dowdy; William E Conner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-04-20       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.