Literature DB >> 15058684

Age differences in enumerating things that move: implications for the development of multiple-object tracking.

Lana M Trick1, Diana Audet, Lynn Dales.   

Abstract

The attentional theory of spatial enumeration (Trick & Pylyshyn, 1994) predicts that subitizing, the rapid process (40-120 msec/item) used to enumerate 1-4 items, employs the same mechanism that permits individuals to track 4-5 moving items simultaneously, whereas enumerating more items requires moving attentional focus from area to area in the display. To test this theory, enumeration of static and moving items was investigated in 8-, 10-, 12-, and 20-year-old participants using a number discrimination task. As was predicted, random independent item motion did not substantially impede enumeration of 1-4 items regardless of age. However, even movement within a 1.14 degree square area slowed enumeration of 6-9 items, although on average the interference decreased with age from 788 msec for the 8-year-olds to 136 msec for the 20-year-olds. The relevance of this finding for theories of enumeration, multiple-object tracking, visual working memory, and object-based attention is discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 15058684     DOI: 10.3758/bf03195806

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  27 in total

1.  Visual marking in moving displays: feature-based inhibition is not necessary.

Authors:  D G Watson
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2001-01

Review 2.  Visual indexes, preconceptual objects, and situated vision.

Authors:  Z W Pylyshyn
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2001-06

3.  Inhibition of return and visual search: how many separate loci are inhibited?

Authors:  J J Snyder; A Kingstone
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2000-04

4.  Visual marking: evidence for inhibition using a probe-dot detection paradigm.

Authors:  D G Watson; G W Humphreys
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2000-04

5.  Span and rate of apprehension in children and adults.

Authors:  M T Chi; D Klahr
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  1975-06

6.  Tracking multiple independent targets: evidence for a parallel tracking mechanism.

Authors:  Z W Pylyshyn; R W Storm
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1988

7.  Interruption of dot processing by a backward mask.

Authors:  P Liss; A Reeves
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 1.490

8.  Object-based and environment-based inhibition of return of visual attention.

Authors:  S P Tipper; B Weaver; L M Jerreat; A L Burak
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Visual routines.

Authors:  S Ullman
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1984-12

10.  Neural evidence linking visual object enumeration and attention.

Authors:  K Sathian; T J Simon; S Peterson; G A Patel; J M Hoffman; S T Grafton
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 3.225

View more
  4 in total

1.  Video playback versus live stimuli to assess quantity discrimination in angelfish (Pterophyllum scalare).

Authors:  Luis M Gómez-Laplaza; Robert Gerlai
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2021-12-16

2.  A computer-based selective visual attention test for first-grade school children: design, development and psychometric properties.

Authors:  Farzaneh Yazdani; Malahat Akbarfahimi; Afsoon Hassani Mehraban; Shohreh Jalaei; Mohammad Torabi-Nami
Journal:  Med J Islam Repub Iran       Date:  2015-02-23

3.  Preschoolers' dot enumeration abilities are markers of their arithmetic competence.

Authors:  Sarah A Gray; Robert A Reeve
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-08       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Ratio dependence in small number discrimination is affected by the experimental procedure.

Authors:  Christian Agrillo; Laura Piffer; Angelo Bisazza; Brian Butterworth
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-10-29
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.