Literature DB >> 8986489

Measuring health and health state preferences among critically ill patients.

X Badia1, A Díaz-Prieto, M Rué, D L Patrick.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: a) to examine the EuroQol instrument's ability to assess a patient's state of health prior to admission to an ICU; b) to describe a patient's health-related quality of life (HRQoL) before the onset of the condition leading to admission to the ICU, and prior to discharge; c) to compare patients' preferences for a "common core" of EuroQol health states with preferences from healthy individuals.
DESIGN: Patients in a step-down unit (SDU) retrospectively rated their health states prior to admission to the ICU, their current states of health and the "common core" of hypothetical EuroQol states of health. Proxies rated the patients' health states prior to admission to the ICU. Patients' preferences for EuroQol states of health were compared with the preferences obtained from a retrospective cohort of healthy individuals.
SETTING: An SDU at the University Hospital of Bellvitge, Barcelona, Spain. PATIENTS: 103 critical medical and surgical patients were interviewed. INTERVENTION: The EuroQol questionnaire, a non-disease specific instrument to evaluate HRQoL.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Agreement between patients and proxies regarding their prior health state was moderate to good in physical and pain areas (kappa: 0.43-0.58), fair for mood (kappa: 0.38) and almost identical for prior overall health (65.9 vs 66.3). Compared with their prior HRQoL, patients had deteriorated in all physical areas and overall health at discharge from the SDU. Preferences for the worst health states varied significantly between patients and healthy individuals.
CONCLUSION: The EuroQol can be reliably used with proxies to determine the state of health of patients prior to admission to the ICU. Preferences between healthy individuals and ICU patients differed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8986489     DOI: 10.1007/bf01709554

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Intensive Care Med        ISSN: 0342-4642            Impact factor:   17.440


  31 in total

1.  Functional outcomes following medical intensive care.

Authors:  R L Goldstein; E W Campion; G E Thibault; A G Mulley; E Skinner
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 7.598

2.  The use of female spouse proxies in common symptom reporting.

Authors:  B R Clarridge; M P Massagli
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 2.983

3.  Quality of life among long-term survivors of intensive care.

Authors:  B Zarén; U Hedstrand
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 7.598

4.  How consistent is patient-reported pre-admission health status when collected during and after hospital stay?

Authors:  E Guadagnoli; P D Cleary
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 2.983

5.  Quality of life and survival following intensive medical care.

Authors:  A Yinnon; A Zimran; C Hershko
Journal:  Q J Med       Date:  1989-04

6.  Health values of the seriously ill. SUPPORT investigators.

Authors:  J Tsevat; E F Cook; M L Green; D B Matchar; N V Dawson; S K Broste; A W Wu; R S Phillips; R K Oye; L Goldman
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1995-04-01       Impact factor: 25.391

7.  APACHE-acute physiology and chronic health evaluation: a physiologically based classification system.

Authors:  W A Knaus; J E Zimmerman; D P Wagner; E A Draper; D E Lawrence
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  1981-08       Impact factor: 7.598

8.  Quality of life after intensive care with the sickness impact profile.

Authors:  Z M Tian; D R Miranda
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 17.440

9.  Patients' and families' preferences for medical intensive care.

Authors:  M Danis; D L Patrick; L I Southerland; M L Green
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1988-08-12       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  The validity of proxy-generated scores as measures of patient health status.

Authors:  M L Rothman; S C Hedrick; K A Bulcroft; D H Hickam; L Z Rubenstein
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 2.983

View more
  26 in total

1.  Sample size calculations in studies using the EuroQol 5D.

Authors:  M Roset; X Badia; N E Mayo
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  The social tariff of EQ-5D is not adequate to assess quality of life in patients with low back pain.

Authors:  Javier Zamora; Francisco Kovacs; Víctor Abraira; Carmen Fernández; Pablo Lázaro
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2006-11-17       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  When (quality of) life is at stake and intensive care is needed: how much can we trust our proxies?

Authors:  Cristina Granja; Luis Filipe Azevedo
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2006-09-07       Impact factor: 17.440

4.  Does intensive care unit severity of illness influence recall of baseline physical function?

Authors:  Victor D Dinglas; Jonathan Gellar; Elizabeth Colantuoni; Vanessa A Stan; Pedro A Mendez-Tellez; Peter J Pronovost; Dale M Needham
Journal:  J Crit Care       Date:  2011-07-06       Impact factor: 3.425

5.  Predictors of early recovery of health status after intensive care.

Authors:  Maurizia Capuzzo; Rui P Moreno; Barbara Jordan; Peter Bauer; Raffaele Alvisi; Philipp G H Metnitz
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2006-08-08       Impact factor: 17.440

6.  Does diabetes have an impact on health-state utility? a study of Asians in Singapore.

Authors:  P Wang; E S Tai; J Thumboo; Hubertus J M Vrijhoef; Nan Luo
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 3.883

7.  Proxy-perceived prior health status and hospital outcome among the critically ill: is there any relationship?

Authors:  A Diaz-Prieto; M T Gorriz; X Badia; H Torrado; E Farrero; J Amador; R Abos
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 17.440

8.  Health-related quality of life as a prognostic factor of survival in critically ill patients.

Authors:  Sebastián Iribarren-Diarasarri; Felipe Aizpuru-Barandiaran; Tomás Muñoz-Martínez; Angel Loma-Osorio; Marianela Hernández-López; José María Ruiz-Zorrilla; Carlos Castillo-Arenal; Juan Luis Dudagoitia-Otaolea; Sergio Martínez-Alutiz; Cristina Vinuesa-Lozano
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2009-01-29       Impact factor: 17.440

9.  One-year mortality, quality of life and predicted life-time cost-utility in critically ill patients with acute respiratory failure.

Authors:  Rita Linko; Raili Suojaranta-Ylinen; Sari Karlsson; Esko Ruokonen; Tero Varpula; Ville Pettilä
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2010-04-12       Impact factor: 9.097

10.  Long-term outcome in ICU patients: what about quality of life?

Authors:  Francisca García Lizana; Daliana Peres Bota; Michael De Cubber; Jean-Louis Vincent
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2003-07-08       Impact factor: 17.440

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.