Literature DB >> 17111230

The social tariff of EQ-5D is not adequate to assess quality of life in patients with low back pain.

Javier Zamora1, Francisco Kovacs, Víctor Abraira, Carmen Fernández, Pablo Lázaro.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We compared the quality of life perceived by patients with non-specific low back pain with that predicted by the social tariff of the Spanish version of EQ-5D questionnaire.
METHODS: For each health state of the EQ-5D, an adjusted tariff for patients with back pain was obtained using a linear regression model in which the linear effect of the three levels of response for each of the five domains of the EQ-5D was assumed. These coefficients were compared with those obtained for the general Spanish population. In another model, equal in structure to the standard "Dolan N3" model, the linear effect of the five domains was not assumed.
RESULTS: In 633 patients, 93 health states were recorded. Significant differences in the coefficients of self-care (p = 0.003) and the maximum level of severity in any dimension (p < 0.0001) were observed. The social tariff of the healthy population is different from the tariff of low back pain patients, with general population values being lower than those of patients, particularly in the 211 health states in which any dimension is at level 3. Weights of the different EQ-5D dimensions showed a non-linear effect on the patients' quality of life.
CONCLUSION: Methods used to develop the social tariff for the Spanish version of EQ-5D were inadequate. In addition, this study shows that values given by the general population are different from those of low back pain patients, further confirming that the social tariff of EQ-5D should not be used with actual patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17111230     DOI: 10.1007/s11136-006-9140-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Life Res        ISSN: 0962-9343            Impact factor:   4.147


  26 in total

Review 1.  [The Spanish version of EuroQol: a description and its applications. European Quality of Life scale].

Authors:  X Badia; M Roset; S Montserrat; M Herdman; A Segura
Journal:  Med Clin (Barc)       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 1.725

2.  It is time for physicians to embrace cost-effectiveness and cost utility analysis research in the treatment of spinal pain.

Authors:  Simon Dagenais; Scott Haldeman; Peter B Polatin
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2005 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.166

3.  The transition from acute to subacute and chronic low back pain: a study based on determinants of quality of life and prediction of chronic disability.

Authors:  Francisco M Kovacs; Víctor Abraira; Javier Zamora; Carmen Fernández
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2005-08-01       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  A comparison of scoring weights for the EuroQol derived from patients and the general public.

Authors:  D Polsky; R J Willke; K Scott; K A Schulman; H A Glick
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 3.046

5.  Cost-utility analysis of osteopathy in primary care: results from a pragmatic randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Nefyn H Williams; Rhiannon T Edwards; Pat Linck; Rachel Muntz; Richard Hibbs; Clare Wilkinson; Ian Russell; Daphne Russell; Barry Hounsome
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  2004-11-05       Impact factor: 2.267

6.  Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness analysis of neuroreflexotherapy for subacute and chronic low back pain in routine general practice: a cluster randomized, controlled trial.

Authors:  Francisco M Kovacs; Joan Llobera; Victor Abraira; Pablo Lázaro; Francisco Pozo; David Kleinbaum
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2002-06-01       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  United Kingdom back pain exercise and manipulation (UK BEAM) randomised trial: cost effectiveness of physical treatments for back pain in primary care.

Authors: 
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-11-19

8.  Correlation between pain, disability, and quality of life in patients with common low back pain.

Authors:  Francisco M Kovacs; Víctor Abraira; Javier Zamora; María Teresa Gil del Real; Joan Llobera; Carmen Fernández; José Ramón Bauza; Kunibert Bauza; Josep Coll; María Cuadri; Elena Duro; Juan Gili; Mario Gestoso; Marina Gómez; Juana González; Patricia Ibañez; Antoni Jover; Pablo Lázaro; Miguel Llinás; Catalina Mateu; Nicole Mufraggi; Alfonso Muriel; Carmen Nicolau; María Arrate Olivera; Patricia Pascual; Lourdes Perelló; Francisco Pozo; Teresa Revuelta; Vicente Reyes; Sebestián Ribot; Jaime Ripoll; Juana Ripoll; Elena Rodríguez
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2004-01-15       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 9.  Does early imaging influence management and improve outcome in patients with low back pain? A pragmatic randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  F J Gilbert; A M Grant; M G C Gillan; L Vale; N W Scott; M K Campbell; D Wardlaw; D Knight; E McIntosh; R W Porter
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 4.014

10.  Non-specific low back pain in primary care in the Spanish National Health Service: a prospective study on clinical outcomes and determinants of management.

Authors:  Francisco M Kovacs; Carmen Fernández; Antonio Cordero; Alfonso Muriel; Luis González-Luján; María Teresa Gil del Real
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2006-05-17       Impact factor: 2.655

View more
  2 in total

1.  New model to explain the EQ-5D VAS in patients who have undergone spinal fusion.

Authors:  Jorge Cortés; Juan F Blanco; David Pescador; Nuria Asensio; Claudio Castro; Juan Moncada Herrera
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2010-08-09       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Non-specific low back pain in primary care in the Spanish National Health Service: a prospective study on clinical outcomes and determinants of management.

Authors:  Francisco M Kovacs; Carmen Fernández; Antonio Cordero; Alfonso Muriel; Luis González-Luján; María Teresa Gil del Real
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2006-05-17       Impact factor: 2.655

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.