Literature DB >> 2704258

The use of female spouse proxies in common symptom reporting.

B R Clarridge1, M P Massagli.   

Abstract

To determine the quality of proxy health reports by telephone the 1984 Wisconsin Health Status Survey employed a repeated-measure design in an interview covering 22 recently occurring health and psychologic complaints. Comparisons on individuals in households containing two or more adults revealed a relatively weak correspondence between the respondent and proxy reports. While a previous analysis of these data found that certain characteristics thought to underlie reporting differences are not useful in explaining proxy underreporting, the current analysis focuses on spousal pairs and achieves greater success by applying somewhat more sophisticated methods. The authors examined the nature, persistence, and number of health complaints as factors in reporting bias. They find evidence that female proxies vary by symptom in their ability to report common complaints and also observed that proxy underreporting diminishes somewhat as the persistence of symptoms increases. Using multiplicative models, the authors show that the gross misclassification of complaints is concentrated in the respondent-proxy pairs with the shortest exposure to the symptom. Finally, an examination of the disagreements on all 22 health complaints simultaneously revealed that neither mutual misallocation by respondents and proxies nor a diminished health status of the individual reported on are important influences on reporting behavior.

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2704258     DOI: 10.1097/00005650-198904000-00003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Care        ISSN: 0025-7079            Impact factor:   2.983


  7 in total

Review 1.  Multi-attribute health status classification systems. Health Utilities Index.

Authors:  D Feeny; W Furlong; M Boyle; G W Torrance
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  Proxy and self-report agreement on the Stroke and Aphasia Quality of Life Scale-39.

Authors:  Katerina Hilari; Sophie Owen; Sharon Jane Farrelly
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2007-01-26       Impact factor: 10.154

3.  A cost-utility analysis of second-line chemotherapy in metastatic breast cancer. Docetaxel versus paclitaxel versus vinorelbine.

Authors:  R Launois; J Reboul-Marty; B Henry; J Bonneterre
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 4.981

4.  Criterion-based validation of the EORTC QLQ-C36 in advanced melanoma: the CIPS questionnaire and proxy raters.

Authors:  V Sigurdardóttir; Y Brandberg; M Sullivan
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 4.147

5.  Influence of proxy respondents and mode of administration on health status assessment following central nervous system tumours in childhood.

Authors:  A W Glaser; K Davies; D Walker; D Brazier
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 4.147

6.  Measuring health and health state preferences among critically ill patients.

Authors:  X Badia; A Díaz-Prieto; M Rué; D L Patrick
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 17.440

7.  The comprehensive assessment of health status in survivors of childhood cancer: application to high-risk acute lymphoblastic leukaemia.

Authors:  D Feeny; A Leiper; R D Barr; W Furlong; G W Torrance; P Rosenbaum; S Weitzman
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 7.640

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.