Literature DB >> 3392810

Patients' and families' preferences for medical intensive care.

M Danis1, D L Patrick, L I Southerland, M L Green.   

Abstract

Medical ethics suggest that life-sustaining treatment decisions should be made with consideration for patients' preferences and quality of life. Patients were interviewed who were at least 55 years old and had experienced medical intensive care at a university hospital during a one-year period to determine their preferences regarding intensive care; family members were interviewed if the patient had died (n = 160). Seventy percent of patients and families were 100% willing to undergo intensive care again to achieve even one month of survival; 8% were completely unwilling to undergo intensive care to achieve any prolongation of survival. Preferences were poorly correlated with functional status or quality of life and were not altered by life expectancy for 82% of respondents. Age, severity of critical illness, length of stay, and charges for intensive care did not influence willingness to undergo intensive care. These data suggest that personal preferences may conflict with any health policy that limits the allocation of intensive care based on age, function, or quality of life.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Death and Euthanasia; Empirical Approach; North Carolina Memorial Hospital; Professional Patient Relationship

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3392810

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  28 in total

Review 1.  [Ethical aspects in end-of-life care].

Authors:  F Nauck
Journal:  Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed       Date:  2011-10-29       Impact factor: 0.840

2.  Attitudes of European physicians, nurses, patients, and families regarding end-of-life decisions: the ETHICATT study.

Authors:  Charles L Sprung; Sara Carmel; Peter Sjokvist; Mario Baras; Simon L Cohen; Paulo Maia; Albertus Beishuizen; Daniel Nalos; Ivan Novak; Mia Svantesson; Julie Benbenishty; Beverly Henderson
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2006-10-26       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 3.  The pressure to withhold or withdraw life-sustaining therapy from critically ill patients in the United States.

Authors:  John M Luce; Douglas B White
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2007-03-22       Impact factor: 21.405

Review 4.  Preferences, needs and QALYs.

Authors:  J Cohen
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 2.903

5.  Intensive care for patients with the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome.

Authors:  J M Luce; R M Wachter
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 17.440

6.  Even without our biases, the outlook for prognostication is grim.

Authors:  James Downar
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2009-07-20       Impact factor: 9.097

7.  Retrospective agreement and consent to neurocritical care is influenced by functional outcome.

Authors:  Ines C Kiphuth; Martin Köhrmann; Joji B Kuramatsu; Christoph Mauer; Lorenz Breuer; Peter D Schellinger; Stefan Schwab; Hagen B Huttner
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2010-07-30       Impact factor: 9.097

8.  Patient choice, cost, and survival of critically ill cancer patients: a societal dilemma.

Authors:  M Markman
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 4.553

9.  Age-specific correlates of quality of life in Chinese women with cervical cancer.

Authors:  Beatrice P Y Lai; Catherine So-Kum Tang; Tony K H Chung
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2008-06-26       Impact factor: 3.603

10.  Physician characteristics associated with decisions to withdraw life support.

Authors:  N A Christakis; D A Asch
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 9.308

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.