Z M Tian1, D R Miranda. 1. Division of Surgical Intensive Care, University Hospital, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: a) to validate the structure of the Sickness Impact Profile scale (SIP) when applied to intensive care patients after discharge from the hospital; b) to explore the influence of age upon the various components of quality of life. DESIGN: Prospective study. SETTING: Patients admitted to 36 Dutch ICUs. METHODS: 6,247 patients out of 13,000 consecutive admissions to the ICUs answered a SIP questionnaire 6 months after discharge from the hospital. The 3,655 returned questionnaire were analyzed after aggregating the respondents into 6 age groups: from group 1: 17-29 up to group 4: > 70 years of age. INTERVENTION: Self-administration of SIP one year after discharge, measuring 5 independent categories (IC) and two dimensions: physical (PD) and psychosocial (PSD). RESULTS: The total SIP-score oscillated between 5.8 +/- 8.2 (group I) and 10.5 +/- 9.5 (group 4). Group 3 had also a high score (9.4 +/- 11.2). Overall, the quality of life of patients was dominated by dysfunction on the categories composing the physical dimension, with exception of patients with ages between 30 and 50 years, in which dysfunction on the categories composing the psychosocial dimension was dominant. The structure of the SIP in the study was similar to that described to the original instrument. CONCLUSIONS: The study validated the use of the SIP QOL-instrument on patients after intensive care. Age influenced consistently the various components of quality of life.
OBJECTIVES: a) to validate the structure of the Sickness Impact Profile scale (SIP) when applied to intensive care patients after discharge from the hospital; b) to explore the influence of age upon the various components of quality of life. DESIGN: Prospective study. SETTING:Patients admitted to 36 Dutch ICUs. METHODS: 6,247 patients out of 13,000 consecutive admissions to the ICUs answered a SIP questionnaire 6 months after discharge from the hospital. The 3,655 returned questionnaire were analyzed after aggregating the respondents into 6 age groups: from group 1: 17-29 up to group 4: > 70 years of age. INTERVENTION: Self-administration of SIP one year after discharge, measuring 5 independent categories (IC) and two dimensions: physical (PD) and psychosocial (PSD). RESULTS: The total SIP-score oscillated between 5.8 +/- 8.2 (group I) and 10.5 +/- 9.5 (group 4). Group 3 had also a high score (9.4 +/- 11.2). Overall, the quality of life of patients was dominated by dysfunction on the categories composing the physical dimension, with exception of patients with ages between 30 and 50 years, in which dysfunction on the categories composing the psychosocial dimension was dominant. The structure of the SIP in the study was similar to that described to the original instrument. CONCLUSIONS: The study validated the use of the SIP QOL-instrument on patients after intensive care. Age influenced consistently the various components of quality of life.
Authors: G Vazquez Mata; R Rivera Fernandez; A Gonzalez Carmona; M Delgado-Rodriguez; J M Torres Ruiz; A Raya Pugnaire; E Aguayo de Hoyos Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 1992-09 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: P A Lipsett; S M Swoboda; J Dickerson; M Ylitalo; T Gordon; M Breslow; K Campbell; T Dorman; P Pronovost; B Rosenfeld Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2000-02 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: David W Dowdy; Mark P Eid; Artyom Sedrakyan; Pedro A Mendez-Tellez; Peter J Pronovost; Margaret S Herridge; Dale M Needham Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2005-04-01 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Annika Ahlström; Minna Tallgren; Seija Peltonen; Pirjo Räsänen; Ville Pettilä Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2005-07-28 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Francisca García Lizana; Daliana Peres Bota; Michael De Cubber; Jean-Louis Vincent Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2003-07-08 Impact factor: 17.440