Literature DB >> 8947684

Health status assessment via the World Wide Web.

D S Bell1, C E Kahn.   

Abstract

We explored the use of the World Wide Web to collect health status information for medical outcomes research. The RAND 36-Item Health Survey 1.0 (RAND-36), which contains the 36 multiple-choice questions of the Medical Outcomes Study SF-36 "Short Form" and differs only in its simplified scoring scheme, was made available for anonymous use on the Internet. Participation in the survey was invited through health-related Internet news groups and mailing lists. Participants entered data and received, their scores using the World Wide Web protocol. Entries were recorded from 15 June 1995 to 14 June 1996 (1 year). The survey was completed anonymously by 4876 individuals with access to the World Wide Web. Two-thirds completed the survey within 5 minutes, and 97% did so within 10 minutes. The item-completion rate was 99.28%. Values of Cronbach's alpha of 0.76 to 0.90 for the scoring scales matched the high reliability found in the Medical Outcomes Study. The World Wide Web provides a method of rapidly measuring individual health status and may play an important role in advancing health services research and outcomes-based patient care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8947684      PMCID: PMC2233166     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc AMIA Annu Fall Symp        ISSN: 1091-8280


  15 in total

1.  The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection.

Authors:  J E Ware; C D Sherbourne
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 2.983

2.  Outcomes measurement: a report from the front.

Authors:  R Geigle; S B Jones
Journal:  Inquiry       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 1.730

Review 3.  Standards for validating health measures: definition and content.

Authors:  J E Ware
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1987

4.  CHORUS: a computer-based radiology handbook for international collaboration via the World Wide Web.

Authors:  C E Kahn
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 5.333

5.  Medical resources on the Internet.

Authors:  J V Glowniak
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1995-07-15       Impact factor: 25.391

6.  Health care reform is on the way: do we want to compete on quality?

Authors:  R H Brook
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1994-01-01       Impact factor: 25.391

7.  The RAND 36-Item Health Survey 1.0.

Authors:  R D Hays; C D Sherbourne; R M Mazel
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 3.046

8.  Criterion validity and reliability of the SF-36 in a population sample.

Authors:  C Jenkinson; L Wright; A Coulter
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 4.147

9.  The next transformation in the delivery of health care.

Authors:  J P Kassirer
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1995-01-05       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): II. Psychometric and clinical tests of validity in measuring physical and mental health constructs.

Authors:  C A McHorney; J E Ware; A E Raczek
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 2.983

View more
  11 in total

1.  Studying clinician-computer interaction in Web-based systems.

Authors:  R Schoenberg; C Safran; D Z Sands
Journal:  Proc AMIA Symp       Date:  2000

2.  Randomized testing of alternative survey formats using anonymous volunteers on the World Wide Web.

Authors:  D S Bell; C M Mangione; C E Kahn
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2001 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.497

3.  Internet-based data inclusion in a population-based European collaborative follow-up study of inflammatory bowel disease patients: description of methods used and analysis of factors influencing response rates.

Authors:  Frank L Wolters; Gilbert van Zeijl; Jildou Sijbrandij; Frederik Wessels; Colm O'Morain; Charles Limonard; Maurice G Russel; Reinhold W Stockbrugger
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2005-12-07       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Quality-of-life research on the Internet: feasibility and potential biases in patients with ulcerative colitis.

Authors:  R M Soetikno; R Mrad; V Pao; L A Lenert
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  1997 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 5.  Can we agree on patient-reported outcome measures for assessing hematopoietic cell transplantation patients? A study from the CIBMTR and BMT CTN.

Authors:  B E Shaw; S J Lee; M M Horowitz; W A Wood; J D Rizzo; K E Flynn
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2016-05-09       Impact factor: 5.483

6.  Development, feasibility and compliance of a web-based system for very frequent QOL and symptom home self-assessment after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Authors:  N Bush; G Donaldson; C Moinpour; M Haberman; D Milliken; V Markle; J Lauson
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 4.147

7.  Examining the symptom experience of hospitalized patients using a pen-based computer.

Authors:  C A Reilly
Journal:  Proc AMIA Symp       Date:  1999

8.  Development of a web-based survey for monitoring daily health and its application in an epidemiological survey.

Authors:  Hiroaki Sugiura; Yasushi Ohkusa; Manabu Akahane; Tomomi Sano; Nobuhiko Okabe; Tomoaki Imamura
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2011-09-23       Impact factor: 5.428

Review 9.  The effectiveness of Web-based vs. non-Web-based interventions: a meta-analysis of behavioral change outcomes.

Authors:  Dean J Wantland; Carmen J Portillo; William L Holzemer; Rob Slaughter; Eva M McGhee
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2004-11-10       Impact factor: 5.428

10.  What do we mean by Internet access? A framework for health researchers.

Authors:  Nigel E Bush; Deborah J Bowen; Jean Wooldridge; Abi Ludwig; Hendrika Meischke; Robert Robbins
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2004-09-15       Impact factor: 2.830

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.