Literature DB >> 15789943

Development, feasibility and compliance of a web-based system for very frequent QOL and symptom home self-assessment after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

N Bush1, G Donaldson, C Moinpour, M Haberman, D Milliken, V Markle, J Lauson.   

Abstract

We believe that many adverse events following hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), particularly relapse and chronic graft-versus-host disease (CGVHD), are preceded by a subclinical period of development that is accessible by frequent psychometric assessment. Documenting these associations could improve future clinical care by extending the potential window for intervention. However, conventional methods of assessing quantity of lite (QOL) in patients in their homes, typically by mailed self-assessment questionnaires, are impractical for very frequent administration. We have developed and implemented a web-based system for measuring short-term (dynamic) changes in QOL by employing brief, online, daily QOL assessments and more extensive, monthly online assessments from patients' homes. Here we report the feasibility of collecting very frequent patient home self-assessments of QOL via the web for a 52 week participation period; we detail incidence of home web access, accrual, compliance, and satisfaction with the system in an HSCT patient sample. We also describe our integrated web-systems for administering patient recruitment, scheduling, monitoring, and analysis. Our results suggest that very frequent routine collection of QOL outcomes is entirely feasible using our web-based home assessment tool, with good patient compliance and high user satisfaction. We believe our methodology shows great promise for use with other cancer and health populations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15789943     DOI: 10.1007/s11136-004-2394-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Life Res        ISSN: 0962-9343            Impact factor:   4.147


  47 in total

1.  The feasibility of a web-based surveillance system to collect health risk behavior data from college students.

Authors:  L N Pealer; R M Weiler; R M Pigg; D Miller; S M Dorman
Journal:  Health Educ Behav       Date:  2001-10

2.  Computerized quality-of-life screening in a cancer pain clinic.

Authors:  L E Carlson; M Speca; N Hagen; P Taenzer
Journal:  J Palliat Care       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 2.250

Review 3.  Chronic graft-versus-host disease and other late complications of bone marrow transplantation.

Authors:  K M Sullivan; E Agura; C Anasetti; F Appelbaum; C Badger; S Bearman; K Erickson; M Flowers; J Hansen; T Loughran
Journal:  Semin Hematol       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 3.851

Review 4.  Quality of life and the cancer experience: the state-of-the-knowledge.

Authors:  C R King; M Haberman; D L Berry; N Bush; L Butler; K H Dow; B Ferrell; M Grant; D Gue; P Hinds; J Kreuer; G Padilla; S Underwood
Journal:  Oncol Nurs Forum       Date:  1997 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.172

Review 5.  Quality of life: what is it? How should it be measured?

Authors:  N K Aaronson
Journal:  Oncology (Williston Park)       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 2.990

6.  Health status assessment via the World Wide Web.

Authors:  D S Bell; C E Kahn
Journal:  Proc AMIA Annu Fall Symp       Date:  1996

7.  The diary as a means of understanding the quality of life of persons with cancer receiving home nursing care.

Authors:  D M Oleske; S Heinze; D M Otte
Journal:  Cancer Nurs       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 2.592

Review 8.  Measuring health-related quality of life.

Authors:  G H Guyatt; D H Feeny; D L Patrick
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1993-04-15       Impact factor: 25.391

9.  Relation between tumor size, quality of life, and survival in patients with colorectal liver metastases.

Authors:  S Earlam; C Glover; C Fordy; D Burke; T G Allen-Mersh
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Feasibility and compliance of automated measurement of quality of life in oncology practice.

Authors:  E P Wright; P J Selby; M Crawford; A Gillibrand; C Johnston; T J Perren; R Rush; A Smith; G Velikova; K Watson; A Gould; A Cull
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2003-01-15       Impact factor: 44.544

View more
  31 in total

1.  Improving patient-centered medical-surgical nursing practice with quality-of-life assessment.

Authors:  Angela Starkweather
Journal:  Medsurg Nurs       Date:  2010 Jul-Aug

2.  Automated symptom alerts reduce postoperative symptom severity after cancer surgery: a randomized controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  Charles S Cleeland; Xin Shelley Wang; Qiuling Shi; Tito R Mendoza; Sherry L Wright; Madonna D Berry; Donna Malveaux; Pankil K Shah; Ibrahima Gning; Wayne L Hofstetter; Joe B Putnam; Ara A Vaporciyan
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-01-31       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Validation and testing of the Acceptability E-scale for web-based patient-reported outcomes in cancer care.

Authors:  Joseph D Tariman; Donna L Berry; Barbara Halpenny; Seth Wolpin; Karen Schepp
Journal:  Appl Nurs Res       Date:  2009-09-18       Impact factor: 2.257

4.  Issues in the design of Internet-based systems for collecting patient-reported outcomes.

Authors:  James B Jones; Claire F Snyder; Albert W Wu
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2007-08-01       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 5.  Inclusion of underserved racial and ethnic groups in cancer intervention research using new media: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Hayley S Thompson; Rachel C Shelton; Jamie Mitchell; Tara Eaton; Pamela Valera; Anne Katz
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2013-12

6.  Monitoring symptoms at home: what methods would cancer patients be comfortable using?

Authors:  Annet Kleiboer; Katie Gowing; Christian Holm Hansen; Carina Hibberd; Laura Hodges; Jane Walker; Parvez Thekkumpurath; Mark O'Connor; Gordon Murray; Michael Sharpe
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2010-05-06       Impact factor: 4.147

7.  Chemotherapy line-associated differences in quality of life in patients with advanced cancer.

Authors:  B Mayrbäurl; L M Wintner; J M Giesinger; Th Himmelfreundpointner; S Burgstaller; B Holzner; J Thaler
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2011-12-29       Impact factor: 3.603

8.  Can the Toronto Extremity Salvage Score produce reliable results when used online?

Authors:  Mark Clayer; Aileen Davis
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-12-03       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 9.  Health-related quality of life following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Authors:  Margaret Bevans
Journal:  Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program       Date:  2010

10.  Centralized patient-reported outcome data collection in transplantation is feasible and clinically meaningful.

Authors:  Bronwen E Shaw; Ruta Brazauskas; Heather R Millard; Rachel Fonstad; Kathryn E Flynn; Amy Abernethy; Jenny Vogel; Charney Petroske; Deborah Mattila; Rebecca Drexler; Stephanie J Lee; Mary M Horowitz; J Douglas Rizzo
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2017-08-17       Impact factor: 6.860

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.