Literature DB >> 8450681

The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): II. Psychometric and clinical tests of validity in measuring physical and mental health constructs.

C A McHorney1, J E Ware, A E Raczek.   

Abstract

Cross-sectional data from the Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) were analyzed to test the validity of the MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) scales as measures of physical and mental health constructs. Results from traditional psychometric and clinical tests of validity were compared. Principal components analysis was used to test for hypothesized physical and mental health dimensions. For purposes of clinical tests of validity, clinical criteria defined mutually exclusive adult patient groups differing in severity of medical and psychiatric conditions. Scales shown in the components analysis to primarily measure physical health (physical functioning and role limitations-physical) best distinguished groups differing in severity of chronic medical condition and had the most pure physical health interpretation. Scales shown to primarily measure mental health (mental health and role limitations-emotional) best distinguished groups differing in the presence and severity of psychiatric disorders and had the most pure mental health interpretation. The social functioning, vitality, and general health perceptions scales measured both physical and mental health components and, thus, had the most complex interpretation. These results are useful in establishing guidelines for the interpretation of each scale and in documenting the size of differences between clinical groups that should be considered very large.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8450681     DOI: 10.1097/00005650-199303000-00006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Care        ISSN: 0025-7079            Impact factor:   2.983


  1652 in total

1.  Heritability of self-reported health.

Authors:  J C Romeis; J F Scherrer; H Xian; S A Eisen; K Bucholz; A C Heath; J Goldberg; M J Lyons; W G Henderson; W R True
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Outcome trajectories for assisted living and nursing facility residents in Oregon.

Authors:  J R Frytak; R A Kane; M D Finch; R L Kane; R Maude-Griffin
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Do we know what global ratings of health-related quality of life measure?

Authors:  B Mozes; Y Maor; A Shmueli
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 4.  A comparative review of generic quality-of-life instruments.

Authors:  S J Coons; S Rao; D L Keininger; R D Hays
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.981

5.  A comparison of responsiveness indices in multiple sclerosis patients.

Authors:  L E Pfennings; H M van der Ploeg; L Cohen; C H Polman
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 4.147

6.  Psychometric evaluation of a Chinese (Taiwanese) version of the SF-36 health survey amongst middle-aged women from a rural community.

Authors:  J L Fuh; S J Wang; S R Lu; K D Juang; S J Lee
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 4.147

7.  Social networks, stress and health-related quality of life.

Authors:  H Achat; I Kawachi; S Levine; C Berkey; E Coakley; G Colditz
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 4.147

8.  Evaluation of the clinical LOINC (Logical Observation Identifiers, Names, and Codes) semantic structure as a terminology model for standardized assessment measures.

Authors:  S Bakken; J J Cimino; R Haskell; R Kukafka; C Matsumoto; G K Chan; S M Huff
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2000 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.497

9.  How much does self-reported health status, measured by the SF-36, vary between electoral wards with different Jarman and Townsend scores?

Authors:  P Marsh; R Carlisle; A J Avery
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 5.386

10.  A global measure of physical functioning: psychometric properties.

Authors:  T Sørlie; H C Sexton; R Busund; D Sørlie
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.402

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.