Literature DB >> 8945789

A new look at anchoring effects: basic anchoring and its antecedents.

T D Wilson1, C E Houston, K M Etling, N Brekke.   

Abstract

In previous anchoring studies people were asked to consider an anchor as a possible answer to the target question or were given informative anchors. The authors predicted that basic anchoring effects can occur, whereby uninformative numerical anchors influence a judgment even when people are not asked to compare this number to the target value. Five studies supported these hypotheses: Basic anchoring occurs if people pay sufficient attention to the anchor value; knowledgeable people are less susceptible to basic anchoring effects; anchoring appears to operate unintentionally and nonconsciously in that it is difficult to avoid even when people are forewarned. The possible mechanisms of basic anchoring and the relation between these mechanisms and other processes of judgment and correction are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8945789     DOI: 10.1037//0096-3445.125.4.387

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen        ISSN: 0022-1015


  28 in total

1.  Seeds aren't anchors.

Authors:  N R Brown; R S Siegler
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2001-04

2.  An experimental investigation of possible memory biases affecting support for racial health care policy.

Authors:  Philip J Mazzocco; Ryan P Brunner
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2012-03-15       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Resisting anchoring effects: The roles of metric and mapping knowledge.

Authors:  Andrew R Smith; Paul D Windschitl
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2015-10

4.  An Anchoring-Based Intervention to Increase Patient Willingness to Use Injectable Medication in Psoriasis.

Authors:  Elias Oussedik; Leah A Cardwell; Nupur U Patel; Omobola Onikoyi; Steven R Feldman
Journal:  JAMA Dermatol       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 10.282

5.  Time preferences are reliable across time-horizons and verbal versus experiential tasks.

Authors:  Evgeniya Lukinova; Yuyue Wang; Steven F Lehrer; Jeffrey C Erlich
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2019-02-05       Impact factor: 8.140

6.  The anchoring effect in metamemory monitoring.

Authors:  Chunliang Yang; Bukuan Sun; David R Shanks
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2018-04

Review 7.  The anchoring bias reflects rational use of cognitive resources.

Authors:  Falk Lieder; Thomas L Griffiths; Quentin J M Huys; Noah D Goodman
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-02

Review 8.  Emotional Expressions Reconsidered: Challenges to Inferring Emotion From Human Facial Movements.

Authors:  Lisa Feldman Barrett; Ralph Adolphs; Stacy Marsella; Aleix M Martinez; Seth D Pollak
Journal:  Psychol Sci Public Interest       Date:  2019-07

Review 9.  Anchoring-and-adjustment bias in communication of disease risk.

Authors:  Ibrahim Senay; Kimberly A Kaphingst
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2009-03-11       Impact factor: 2.583

10.  How do adult humans compare with New Caledonian crows in tool selectivity?

Authors:  Francisco J Silva; Kathleen M Silva
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 1.986

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.