Literature DB >> 25911272

Resisting anchoring effects: The roles of metric and mapping knowledge.

Andrew R Smith1, Paul D Windschitl2.   

Abstract

The biasing influence of anchors on numerical estimates is well established, but the relationship between knowledge level and the susceptibility to anchoring effects is less clear. In two studies, we addressed the potential mitigating effects of having knowledge in a domain on vulnerability to anchoring effects in that domain. Of critical interest was a distinction between two forms of knowledge-metric and mapping knowledge. In Study 1, participants who had studied question-relevant information-that is, high-knowledge participants-were less influenced by anchors than were participants who had studied irrelevant information. The results from knowledge measures suggested that the reduction in anchoring was tied to increases in metric rather than mapping knowledge. In Study 2, participants studied information specifically designed to influence different types of knowledge. As we predicted, increases in metric knowledge-and not mapping knowledge-led to reduced anchoring effects. Implications for debiasing anchoring effects are discussed.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Accuracy; Anchoring effects; Bias; Heuristics; Knowledge

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25911272     DOI: 10.3758/s13421-015-0524-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  14 in total

1.  Be careful what you ask for: the effect of anchors on personal injury damages awards.

Authors:  M W Marti; R L Wissler
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Appl       Date:  2000-06

2.  The use of category and exemplar knowledge in the solution of anchoring tasks.

Authors:  T Mussweiler; F Strack
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2000-06

3.  The effect of accuracy motivation on anchoring and adjustment: do people adjust from provided anchors?

Authors:  Joseph P Simmons; Robyn A LeBoeuf; Leif D Nelson
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2010-12

4.  Playing dice with criminal sentences: the influence of irrelevant anchors on experts' judicial decision making.

Authors:  Birte Englich; Thomas Mussweiler; Fritz Strack
Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Bull       Date:  2006-02

5.  The mapping model: a cognitive theory of quantitative estimation.

Authors:  Bettina von Helversen; Jörg Rieskamp
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2008-02

6.  Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases.

Authors:  A Tversky; D Kahneman
Journal:  Science       Date:  1974-09-27       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  A new look at anchoring effects: basic anchoring and its antecedents.

Authors:  T D Wilson; C E Houston; K M Etling; N Brekke
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1996-12

8.  Metrics and mappings: a framework for understanding real-world quantitative estimation.

Authors:  N R Brown; R S Siegler
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 8.934

9.  The influence of irrelevant anchors on the judgments and choices of doctors and patients.

Authors:  Noel T Brewer; Gretchen B Chapman; Janet A Schwartz; George R Bergus
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2007 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.583

10.  Updating geographical knowledge: principles of coherence and inertia.

Authors:  A Friedman; N R Brown
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 3.051

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.