Literature DB >> 29164524

The anchoring effect in metamemory monitoring.

Chunliang Yang1,2, Bukuan Sun3, David R Shanks4,5.   

Abstract

Judgments about future memory performance (metamemory judgments) are known to be susceptible to illusions and bias. Here we asked whether metamemory judgments are affected, like many other forms of judgment, by numerical anchors. Experiment 1 confirmed previous research showing an effect of informative anchors (e.g., past peer performance) on metamemory monitoring. In four further experiments, we then explored the effects of uninformative anchors. All of the experiments obtained significant anchoring effects on metamemory monitoring; in contrast, the anchors had no effect on recall itself. We also explored the anchoring effect on metamemory control (restudy choices) in Experiment 4. The results suggested that anchors can affect metamemory monitoring, which in turn affects metamemory control. The present research reveals that informative and, more importantly, uninformative numbers that have no influence on recall itself can bias metamemory judgments. On the basis of the current theoretical understanding of the anchoring effect and metamemory monitoring, these results offer insight into the processes that trigger metacognitive biases.

Keywords:  Anchoring; Informative; Metamemory control; Metamemory monitoring; Uninformative

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29164524     DOI: 10.3758/s13421-017-0772-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  40 in total

1.  Anchoring, Activation, and the Construction of Values.

Authors: 
Journal:  Organ Behav Hum Decis Process       Date:  1999-08

2.  First offers as anchors: the role of perspective-taking and negotiator focus.

Authors:  A D Galinsky; T Mussweiler
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2001-10

3.  Playing dice with criminal sentences: the influence of irrelevant anchors on experts' judicial decision making.

Authors:  Birte Englich; Thomas Mussweiler; Fritz Strack
Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Bull       Date:  2006-02

4.  Optimising self-regulated study: the benefits - and costs - of dropping flashcards.

Authors:  Nate Kornell; Robert A Bjork
Journal:  Memory       Date:  2008-02

5.  Evidence that judgments of learning are causally related to study choice.

Authors:  Janet Metcalfe; Bridgid Finn
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2008-02

6.  When people's judgments of learning (JOLs) are extremely accurate at predicting subsequent recall: the "Displaced-JOL effect".

Authors:  Young Bui; Mary A Pyc; Heather Bailey
Journal:  Memory       Date:  2017-11-29

7.  The influence of irrelevant anchors on the judgments and choices of doctors and patients.

Authors:  Noel T Brewer; Gretchen B Chapman; Janet A Schwartz; George R Bergus
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2007 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.583

8.  The effect of identical word pairs on people's metamemory judgments: What are the contributions of processing fluency and beliefs about memory?

Authors:  Michael L Mueller; John Dunlosky; Sarah K Tauber
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2015-07-03       Impact factor: 2.143

9.  Learning concepts and categories: is spacing the "enemy of induction"?

Authors:  Nate Kornell; Robert A Bjork
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2008-06

10.  Framing effects on metacognitive monitoring and control.

Authors:  Bridgid Finn
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2008-06
View more
  2 in total

1.  So you think you can read? Generalized metacomprehension in younger and older adults.

Authors:  Erika K Fulton
Journal:  Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn       Date:  2021-11-24

2.  A Bayesian inference model for metamemory.

Authors:  Xiao Hu; Jun Zheng; Ningxin Su; Tian Fan; Chunliang Yang; Yue Yin; Stephen M Fleming; Liang Luo
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2021-05-27       Impact factor: 8.247

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.