Literature DB >> 19279297

Anchoring-and-adjustment bias in communication of disease risk.

Ibrahim Senay1, Kimberly A Kaphingst.   

Abstract

Over the next decade, advances in genomics will make it increasingly possible to provide patients with personalized, genetic-based risks of common diseases, allowing them the opportunity to take preventive steps through behavioral changes. However, previous research indicates that people may insufficiently adjust their subjective risk to the objective risk value communicated to them by a healthcare provider, a phenomenon called anchoring-and-adjustment bias. In this narrative review, we analyze existing research on how patients process disease-risk information, and the processing biases that may occur, to show that the bias observed in disease-risk communication is potentially malleable to change. We recommend that, to reduce this bias and change patients' misperceptions of disease risk in clinical settings, future studies investigate the effects of forewarning patients about the bias, tailoring risk information to their numeracy level, emphasizing social roles, increasing motivation to form accurate risk perception, and reducing social stigmatization, disease worry and information overload.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19279297      PMCID: PMC2668745          DOI: 10.1177/0272989X08327395

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Decis Making        ISSN: 0272-989X            Impact factor:   2.583


  35 in total

1.  Taking perspective in conversation: the role of mutual knowledge in comprehension.

Authors:  B Keysar; D J Barr; J A Balin; J S Brauner
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2000-01

2.  First offers as anchors: the role of perspective-taking and negotiator focus.

Authors:  A D Galinsky; T Mussweiler
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2001-10

3.  Risk as analysis and risk as feelings: some thoughts about affect, reason, risk, and rationality.

Authors:  Paul Slovic; Melissa L Finucane; Ellen Peters; Donald G MacGregor
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 4.000

4.  Informing women about their breast cancer risks: truth and consequences.

Authors:  I M Lipkus; M Biradavolu; K Fenn; P Keller; B K Rimer
Journal:  Health Commun       Date:  2001

Review 5.  Risk perception and risk communication for cancer screening behaviors: a review.

Authors:  S W Vernon
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  1999

6.  Harvard report on cancer prevention volume 4: Harvard Cancer Risk Index. Risk Index Working Group, Harvard Center for Cancer Prevention.

Authors:  G A Colditz; K A Atwood; K Emmons; R R Monson; W C Willett; D Trichopoulos; D J Hunter
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 2.506

7.  Implications of the Human Genome Project for medical science.

Authors:  F S Collins; V A McKusick
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2001-02-07       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Women's preferences and consultants' communication of risk in consultations about familial breast cancer: impact on patient outcomes.

Authors:  E A Lobb; P N Butow; B Meiser; A Barratt; C Gaff; M A Young; J Kirk; M Gattas; M Gleeson; K Tucker
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 6.318

9.  Lay understanding of terms used in cancer consultations.

Authors:  Kristina Chapman; Charles Abraham; Valerie Jenkins; Lesley Fallowfield
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 3.894

10.  Changes in psychological distress after cancer genetic counselling: a comparison of affected and unaffected women.

Authors:  A Bish; S Sutton; C Jacobs; S Levene; A Ramirez; S Hodgson
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2002-01-07       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  26 in total

Review 1.  Re-conceptualizing risk in genetic counseling: implications for clinical practice.

Authors:  Jehannine C Austin
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2010-01-30       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 2.  Patient responses to genetic information: studies of patients with hereditary cancer syndromes identify issues for use of genetic testing in nephrology practice.

Authors:  Kimberly A Kaphingst; Colleen M McBride
Journal:  Semin Nephrol       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 5.299

3.  Correlates of unrealistic risk beliefs in a nationally representative sample.

Authors:  Erika A Waters; William M P Klein; Richard P Moser; Mandi Yu; William R Waldron; Timothy S McNeel; Andrew N Freedman
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2010-11-26

4.  Estimating and disclosing the risk of developing Alzheimer's disease: challenges, controversies and future directions.

Authors:  J Scott Roberts; Sarah M Tersegno
Journal:  Future Neurol       Date:  2010-07-01

5.  Communicating genetic and genomic information: health literacy and numeracy considerations.

Authors:  D H Lea; K A Kaphingst; D Bowen; I Lipkus; D W Hadley
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2010-04-20       Impact factor: 2.000

6.  Future health applications of genomics: priorities for communication, behavioral, and social sciences research.

Authors:  Colleen M McBride; Deborah Bowen; Lawrence C Brody; Celeste M Condit; Robert T Croyle; Marta Gwinn; Muin J Khoury; Laura M Koehly; Bruce R Korf; Theresa M Marteau; Kenneth McLeroy; Kevin Patrick; Thomas W Valente
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 5.043

7.  Effects of patient-provider race concordance and smoking status on lung cancer risk perception accuracy among African-Americans.

Authors:  Susan Persky; Kimberly A Kaphingst; Vincent C Allen; Ibrahim Senay
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2013-06

8.  How can psychological science inform research about genetic counseling for clinical genomic sequencing?

Authors:  Cynthia M Khan; Christine Rini; Barbara A Bernhardt; J Scott Roberts; Kurt D Christensen; James P Evans; Kyle B Brothers; Myra I Roche; Jonathan S Berg; Gail E Henderson
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2014-12-09       Impact factor: 2.537

9.  Judging risk for multiple diseases: the role of disease worry.

Authors:  Ibrahim Senay; Sharon Hensley-Alford; Kimberly A Kaphingst
Journal:  J Health Psychol       Date:  2012-07-27

10.  Associations between risk perceptions and worry about common diseases: a between- and within-subjects examination.

Authors:  Shoshana Shiloh; Christopher H Wade; J Scott Roberts; Sharon Hensley Alford; Barbara B Biesecker
Journal:  Psychol Health       Date:  2012-11-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.