Literature DB >> 8923633

Comparison of the use of supine bending and traction radiographs in the selection of the fusion area in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

J J Vaughan1, R B Winter, J E Lonstein.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: A study was done to evaluate the use of voluntary supine side bending radiographs and Risser table traction radiographs in adolescent patients undergoing posterior spinal fusion for idiopathic scoliosis.
OBJECTIVES: To compare the usefulness of supine side bending and traction radiographs in assessing curve flexibility and determining fusion levels in patients undergoing posterior spinal fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Supine side bending radiographs have been used in the preoperative evaluation of idiopathic scoliosis to determine curve flexibility and fusion area. Traction films have been used to determine the flexibility of large curves and neuromuscular curves where active side bending is not possible. No study to date has compared the use of these films in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis undergoing surgery.
METHODS: Seventy-five patients with more than a 2-year follow-up period after surgery were included in this study. Preoperative radiographs included a standing posteroanterior and lateral film and both supine maximal voluntary side bending films and a traction film done on a Risser table. A preoperative review of these radiographs was done to determine curve flexibility and fusion levels. At follow-up evaluation, the patients were examined for any evidence of decompensation or "adding-on" of levels.
RESULTS: For curves less than 60 degrees, side bending radiographs showed greater curve correction than traction radiographs, whereas the opposite was true for curves greater than 60 degrees. For King I and II curves, side bending radiographs were superior for determination of lumbar curve flexibility and for distinguishing these two types of curves. On traction radiographs, the stable vertebra was 1.4 vertebral levels higher than on the standing film. When the fusion level was moved proximally because of the traction radiograph, decompensation or "adding-on" commonly occurred.
CONCLUSIONS: Supine bending radiographs are superior to traction radiographs for assessing curve flexibility except for curves more than 60 degrees. The selection of the distal extent of fusion based on the traction radiograph gave a large number of poor results. The selection of fusion levels in adolescent Idiopathic scoliosis is best determined by a combination of standing posteroanterior and lateral radiographs and the supine maximum voluntary bend films.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8923633     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199611010-00012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  21 in total

1.  Is there a need for anterior release for 70-90 degrees masculine thoracic curves in adolescent scoliosis?

Authors:  Vincent Arlet; Liang Jiang; Jean Ouellet
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2004-12-22       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  EOS suspension test for the assessment of spinal flexibility in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Caroline Hirsch; Brice Ilharreborde; Keyvan Mazda
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-02-04       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  In-vivo demonstration of the effectiveness of thoracoscopic anterior release using the fulcrum-bending radiograph: a report of five cases.

Authors:  Kenneth M C Cheung; Duo Sai Lu; Hou Zhang; Keith D K Luk
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-12-21       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Cobb-1 versus cobb-to-cobb anterior fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis Lenke 5C curves: a radiological comparative study.

Authors:  Arnaud Dubory; Lotfi Miladi; Brice Ilharreborde; Jean-Marie Gennari; Jihane Rouissi; Christophe Glorion; Charles Henri Flouzat Lachaniette; Thierry Odent
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-10-04       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Coronal deformity correction in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients using the fulcrum-bending radiograph: a prospective comparative analysis of the proximal thoracic, main thoracic, and thoracolumbar/lumbar curves.

Authors:  Jingfeng Li; Mark L Dumonski; Dino Samartzis; Joseph Hong; Shisheng He; Xiaodong Zhu; Chuanfeng Wang; Alexander R Vaccaro; Todd J Albert; Ming Li
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-08-11       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Electromyogram and kinematic analysis of lateral bending in idiopathic scoliosis patients.

Authors:  V Feipel; C E Aubin; O C Ciolofan; M Beauséjour; H Labelle; P A Mathieu
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 2.602

7.  In vivo and in vitro analysis of rat lumbar spine mechanics.

Authors:  Matthew E Cunningham; Jocelyn M Beach; Serkan Bilgic; Oheneba Boachie-Adjei; Marjolein C H van der Meulen; Chisa Hidaka
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-06-15       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Combined anterior and posterior instrumentation in severe and rigid idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Viola Bullmann; Henry F H Halm; Tobias Schulte; Thomas Lerner; Thomas P Weber; Ulf R Liljenqvist
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-01-12       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Posterior fusion only for thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis of more than 80 degrees: pedicle screws versus hybrid instrumentation.

Authors:  Mario Di Silvestre; Georgios Bakaloudis; Francesco Lolli; Francesco Vommaro; Konstantinos Martikos; Patrizio Parisini
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-08-12       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Does brace treatment impact upon the flexibility and the correctability of idiopathic scoliosis in adolescents?

Authors:  Xu Sun; Wen-jun Liu; Lei-lei Xu; Qi Ding; Sai-hu Mao; Bang-ping Qian; Ze-zhang Zhu; Yong Qiu
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-08-23       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.