Literature DB >> 20700611

Coronal deformity correction in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients using the fulcrum-bending radiograph: a prospective comparative analysis of the proximal thoracic, main thoracic, and thoracolumbar/lumbar curves.

Jingfeng Li1, Mark L Dumonski, Dino Samartzis, Joseph Hong, Shisheng He, Xiaodong Zhu, Chuanfeng Wang, Alexander R Vaccaro, Todd J Albert, Ming Li.   

Abstract

The aim of the prospective, comparative radiographic analysis was to determine the role of the fulcrum-bending radiograph (FBR) for the assessment of the proximal thoracic (PT), main thoracic (MT), and the thoracolumbar/lumbar (TL/L) curves in patients undergoing posterior spinal pedicle screw fixation and fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). The FBR demonstrated statistically better correction than other preoperative methods for the assessment of frontal plane correction of the MT curves. The fulcrum-bending correction index (FBCI) has been considered a superior method than the correction rate for comparing curve correction undergoing posterior spinal fusion because it accounts for the curve flexibility. However, their applicability to assess the PT and TL/L curves in AIS patients remains speculative. The relation between FBR and correction obtained by pedicle screws fixation is still unknown. Thirty-eight consecutive AIS patients who underwent pedicle screw fixation and posterior fusion were included in this study. The assessment of preoperative radiographs included standing posterior-anterior (PA), FBR, supine side-bending, and postoperative standing PA and lateral plain radiographs. The flexibility of the curve, as well as the FBCI, was calculated for all patients. Postoperatively, radiographs were assessed at immediate (i.e. 1 week), 3-month, 6-month, 12-month, and 2-year follow-up. Cobb angles were obtained from the PT, MT, and TL/L curves. The study consisted of 9 PT, 37 MT, and 12 TL/L curves, with a mean age of 15.1 years. The mean FBR flexibility of the PT, MT, and the TL/L curves was 42.6, 61.1, and 66.2%, respectively. The mean operative correction rates in the PT, MT, and TL/L curves were 43.4, 69.3, and 73.9%, respectively, and the mean FBCI was 103.8, 117.0, and 114.8%, respectively. Fulcrum-bending flexibility was positively correlated with the operative correction rate in PT, MT, and TL/L curves. Although the correction rate in MT and TL/L curves was higher than PT curves, the FBCI in PT, MT, and TL/L curves was not significantly different (p < 0.05). The FBR can be used to assist in the assessment of PT, MT, and TL/L curve corrections in AIS patients. When curve flexibility is taken into account by FBR, the ability of pedicle screws to correct PT, MT, and TL/L curves is the same.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20700611      PMCID: PMC3036022          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-010-1495-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  19 in total

1.  Comparison of push-prone and lateral-bending radiographs for predicting postoperative coronal alignment in thoracolumbar and lumbar scoliotic curves.

Authors:  R Vedantam; L G Lenke; K H Bridwell; D L Linville
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 2.  Curve prevalence of a new classification of operative adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: does classification correlate with treatment?

Authors:  Lawrence G Lenke; Randal R Betz; David Clements; Andrew Merola; Thomas Haher; Thomas Lowe; Peter Newton; Keith H Bridwell; Kathy Blanke
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2002-03-15       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Preventing decompensation in King type II curves treated with Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation. Strict guidelines for selective thoracic fusion.

Authors:  L G Lenke; K H Bridwell; C Baldus; K Blanke
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Criteria for selective fusion in idiopathic scoliosis using Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation.

Authors:  R E McCall; W Bronson
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  1992 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.324

5.  Surgical treatment of double major scoliosis. Improvement of the lumbar curve after fusion of the thoracic curve.

Authors:  D F Large; W G Doig; D R Dickens; I P Torode; W G Cole
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1991-01

6.  Surgical correction of vertebral axial rotation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: prediction by lateral bending films.

Authors:  D D Aronsson; I A Stokes; P J Ronchetti; B S Richards
Journal:  J Spinal Disord       Date:  1996-06

7.  Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a new classification to determine extent of spinal arthrodesis.

Authors:  L G Lenke; R R Betz; J Harms; K H Bridwell; D H Clements; T G Lowe; K Blanke
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  The radiographic assessment of spinal flexibility in scoliosis: a study of the efficacy of the prone push film.

Authors:  R G Kleinman; J J Csongradi; L A Rinksy; E E Bleck
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1982 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  A prospective comparison of the coronal deformity correction in thoracic scoliosis using four different instrumentations and the fulcrum-bending radiograph.

Authors:  K D K Luk; D S Lu; K M C Cheung; Y W Wong
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2004-03-01       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Predictability of the fulcrum bending radiograph in scoliosis correction with alternate-level pedicle screw fixation.

Authors:  Kenneth M C Cheung; Deepa Natarajan; Dino Samartzis; Yat-Wa Wong; Wai-Yuen Cheung; Keith D K Luk
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 5.284

View more
  9 in total

1.  Reciprocal sagittal alignment changes after posterior fusion in the setting of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  B Blondel; V Lafage; F Schwab; J P Farcy; G Bollini; J L Jouve
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-06-22       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  Clinical investigation and imaging.

Authors:  Daniel Studer
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2012-12-11       Impact factor: 1.548

3.  Comparison of slot-scanning standing, supine, and fulcrum radiographs for assessment of curve flexibility in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a pilot study.

Authors:  Lauren M Swany; A Noelle Larson; A Fettah Buyuk; Todd A Milbrandt
Journal:  Spine Deform       Date:  2021-05-06

4.  Preventing Fusion Mass Shift Avoids Postoperative Distal Curve Adding-on in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis.

Authors:  Hideki Shigematsu; Jason Pui Yin Cheung; Mauro Bruzzone; Hiroaki Matsumori; Kin-Cheung Mak; Dino Samartzis; Keith Dip Kei Luk
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-01-03       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Does brace treatment impact upon the flexibility and the correctability of idiopathic scoliosis in adolescents?

Authors:  Xu Sun; Wen-jun Liu; Lei-lei Xu; Qi Ding; Sai-hu Mao; Bang-ping Qian; Ze-zhang Zhu; Yong Qiu
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-08-23       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Fulcrum flexibility of the main curve predicts postoperative shoulder imbalance in selective thoracic fusion of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Soren Ohrt-Nissen; Vijay H D Kamath; Dino Samartzis; Keith Dip Kei Luk; Jason Pui Yin Cheung
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-06-21       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Selection of Fusion Levels Using the Fulcrum Bending Radiograph for the Management of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Patients with Alternate Level Pedicle Screw Strategy: Clinical Decision-making and Outcomes.

Authors:  Dino Samartzis; Yee Leung; Hideki Shigematsu; Deepa Natarajan; Oliver Stokes; Kin-Cheung Mak; Guanfeng Yao; Keith D K Luk; Kenneth M C Cheung
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-13       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Comparison of Radiographic Postoperative Outcomes Between Males and Females With AIS.

Authors:  Ximing Xu; Fei Wang; Xiaoyi Zhou; Yajun Cheng; Xianzhao Wei; Yushu Bai; Ming Li
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 1.817

9.  Comparative Analysis of Combined (First Anterior, Then Posterior) Versus Only Posterior Approach for Treating Severe Scoliosis: A Mean Follow Up of 8.5 Years.

Authors:  Nikša Hero; Rok Vengust; Matevž Topolovec
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 3.241

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.