Literature DB >> 25649183

EOS suspension test for the assessment of spinal flexibility in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Caroline Hirsch1, Brice Ilharreborde, Keyvan Mazda.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The assessment of spinal flexibility is essential for the planning of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) surgery. Various radiographic methods have been used but none of them has shown any superiority. The new low-dose stereography system EOS (EOS imaging, Paris, France) captures whole body images in a single scan without vertical distortion. EOS is now used in routine clinical use for AIS follow-up. The aim of this study was to prospectively evaluate the feasibility and the reproducibility of a new suspension test during the EOS imaging for the assessment of spinal flexibility in AIS.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty AIS patients scheduled for surgery were prospectively included. For each patient, a standard EOS radiograph was obtained, then a suspension test in the EOS and a classic traction test on the cotrel frame were performed. The examinations were compared in terms of radiation exposure, tolerance, mean traction force, and Cobb angle reduction for each curve. Axial and sagittal reductions during suspension were analyzed on three-dimensional EOS reconstructions.
RESULTS: The tolerance of the suspension test was lower than the traction test but it was less operator dependent. Radiation exposure was 7 times lower during the suspension test. Cobb angle reductions achieved in the proximal and main curves by the two tests were similar. The traction test achieved greater reduction of the distal curve. Flexibility in the axial plane and in the sagittal plane was analyzed with the suspension test. The reduction in apical rotation was not correlated with the reduction in Cobb angle.
CONCLUSION: The EOS suspension test can be used for the assessment of spinal flexibility in AIS. It gives a global vision of the deformity with new flexibility indices in the axial and sagittal planes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25649183     DOI: 10.1007/s00586-015-3771-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  28 in total

1.  Comparison of push-prone and lateral-bending radiographs for predicting postoperative coronal alignment in thoracolumbar and lumbar scoliotic curves.

Authors:  R Vedantam; L G Lenke; K H Bridwell; D L Linville
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Paediatric x-ray radiation dose reduction and image quality analysis.

Authors:  L Martin; R Ruddlesden; C Makepeace; L Robinson; T Mistry; H Starritt
Journal:  J Radiol Prot       Date:  2013-06-27       Impact factor: 1.394

3.  Reliability of cervical lordosis and global sagittal spinal balance measurements in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Christophe Vidal; Brice Ilharreborde; Robin Azoulay; Guy Sebag; Keyvan Mazda
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-03-31       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Variation in Cobb angle measurements in scoliosis.

Authors:  J E Pruijs; M A Hageman; W Keessen; R van der Meer; J C van Wieringen
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a new classification to determine extent of spinal arthrodesis.

Authors:  L G Lenke; R R Betz; J Harms; K H Bridwell; D H Clements; T G Lowe; K Blanke
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Assessment of curve flexibility in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Azmi Hamzaoglu; Ufuk Talu; Mehmet Tezer; Cuneyt Mirzanli; Unsal Domanic; S Bora Goksan
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2005-07-15       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Evaluation of a functional position for lateral radiograph acquisition in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Frances D Faro; Michelle C Marks; Jeffrey Pawelek; Peter O Newton
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2004-10-15       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Assessment of spinal flexibility in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: suspension versus side-bending radiography.

Authors:  Marie-Eve Lamarre; Stefan Parent; Hubert Labelle; Carl-Eric Aubin; Julie Joncas; Anne Cabral; Yvan Petit
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2009-03-15       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  The radiographic assessment of spinal flexibility in scoliosis: a study of the efficacy of the prone push film.

Authors:  R G Kleinman; J J Csongradi; L A Rinksy; E E Bleck
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1982 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Anatomic deviation between the central hip vertical axis and central sacral vertical line in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Jing Guo; Zhen Liu; Bangping Qian; Zezhang Zhu; Hua Jiang; Yong Qiu
Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech       Date:  2012-08
View more
  6 in total

1.  Patterns of coronal curve changes in forward bending posture: a 3D ultrasound study of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients.

Authors:  Wei Wei Jiang; Connie Lok Kan Cheng; Jason Pui Yin Cheung; Dino Samartzis; Kelly Ka Lee Lai; Michael Kai Tsun To; Yong Ping Zheng
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-06-25       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Intra- and inter-rater reliability of spinal flexibility measurements using ultrasonic (US) images for non-surgical candidates with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a pilot study.

Authors:  Mahdieh Khodaei; Doug Hill; Rui Zheng; Lawrence H Le; Edmond H M Lou
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-03-09       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Hanging radiograph in idiopathic scoliosis patients: significance as a preoperative stress X-ray.

Authors:  Hiroshi Kuroki; Takuya Nagai; Etsuo Chosa; Naoya Tajima
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2021-12

4.  Preliminary experience with SpineEOS, a new software for 3D planning in AIS surgery.

Authors:  Emmanuelle Ferrero; Keyvan Mazda; Anne-Laure Simon; Brice Ilharreborde
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-04-24       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Microstructural characterization of annulus fibrosus by ultrasonography: a feasibility study with an in vivo and in vitro approach.

Authors:  Tristan Langlais; Pierre Desprairies; Raphael Pietton; Pierre-Yves Rohan; Jean Dubousset; Judith R Meakin; Peter C Winlove; Raphael Vialle; Wafa Skalli; Claudio Vergari
Journal:  Biomech Model Mechanobiol       Date:  2019-06-20

6.  EOS(®) biplanar X-ray imaging: concept, developments, benefits, and limitations.

Authors:  Elias Melhem; Ayman Assi; Rami El Rachkidi; Ismat Ghanem
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2016-02-16       Impact factor: 1.548

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.