Literature DB >> 15614518

Is there a need for anterior release for 70-90 degrees masculine thoracic curves in adolescent scoliosis?

Vincent Arlet1, Liang Jiang, Jean Ouellet.   

Abstract

Large and stiff thoracic scoliotic curves in the adolescent represent a classic indication of anterior release followed by posterior instrumentation. However, third-generation segmental spinal instrumentations have shown increased correction of thoracic curves. Indication for an anterior release may therefore not be required even in large and stiff thoracic curves. The objective of the study was, therefore, to analyze retrospectively the results of third-generation segmental posterior instrumentation in large and stiff thoracic curves and to compare our results with the current literature of anterior release followed by posterior instrumentation. An independent observer, who had not participated in any of the case, reviewed our electronic database of adolescent scoliosis surgery (Scolisoft) with the following query: thoracic curves, Cobb angle between 70 degrees and 90 degrees and posterior surgery only. He was able to identify 19 patients whose thoracic curves were measured between 70 degrees and 90 degrees . Out of these, four had convex-side bending Cobb angle values of less than 45 degrees and were not included in the study, as they were judged too flexible. Fifteen patients (aged 11-18 years, mean 13.6 years) with thoracic scoliosis were left for the study (average Cobb angles 78.5 degrees with a flexibility index of 32.5% (range, 19-42%). The mean follow-up period was 32 months (range 18-64 months). Classic parameters of deformity correction were analysed. The average operative time was 314 min and the mean total blood loss was 1,875 ml. Average level of instrumented vertebrae was 12 (Range, 10-14). Postoperatively, the thoracic Cobb angle was measured at 34.8 degrees (range, 25-45 degrees ), which represents a correction rate of 54% (range, 40.0-67.1%) and remained unchanged at the last follow-up (35 degrees ). Patients with thoracic hypokyphosis improved from an average 11 degrees to 18 degrees . There were three complications (one excessive bleeding, one early infection and one late infection). One case showed an add-on phenomenon at the last follow-up. Coronal balance was improved from 1.8 cm (Range 0-4 cm) down to 0.75 cm (range 0-2.5 cm). Shoulder balance was improved from 1.3 cm (range 0-4 cm) down to 0.75 (0-2.5 cm). All patients reported satisfactory results except the patient with an adding-on phenomena. In the literature, most of the results of anterior thoracoscopic release and posterior surgery give a percentage of Cobb angle correction similar or inferior to our series for an average initial Cobb angle of less magnitude. Therefore, with adequate posterior release, and the use of third-generation segmental instrumentation there is no need for anterior release even for curves in the 70-90 degrees range.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15614518      PMCID: PMC3454059          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-004-0729-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  11 in total

1.  Decompensation following scoliosis surgery: treatment by decreasing the correction of the main thoracic curve or "letting the spine go".

Authors:  V Arlet; D Marchesi; P Papin; M Aebi
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  [Treatment of scoliosis in the adolescent by anterior release and vertebral arthrodesis under thoracoscopy. Preliminary results].

Authors:  P Papin; V Arlet; D Marchesi; J M Laberge; M Aebi
Journal:  Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot       Date:  1998-05

3.  Scoliosis correction maintenance in skeletally immature patients with idiopathic scoliosis. Is anterior fusion really necessary?

Authors:  D C Burton; M A Asher; S M Lai
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Comparison of the use of supine bending and traction radiographs in the selection of the fusion area in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  J J Vaughan; R B Winter; J E Lonstein
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1996-11-01       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  The treatment of large (>70 degrees) thoracic idiopathic scoliosis curves with posterior instrumentation and arthrodesis: when is anterior release indicated?

Authors:  Douglas C Burton; Andrew A Sama; Marc A Asher; Stephen W Burke; Oheneba Boachie-Adjei; R C Huang; D W Green; Bernard A Rawlins
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2005-09-01       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Anterior thoracoscopic surgery followed by posterior instrumentation and fusion in spinal deformity.

Authors:  T Niemeyer; B J Freeman; M P Grevitt; J K Webb
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Defining the pediatric spinal thoracoscopy learning curve: sixty-five consecutive cases.

Authors:  P O Newton; K G Shea; K F Granlund
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-04-15       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Anterior thoracoscopic spine release in deformity surgery: a meta-analysis and review.

Authors:  V Arlet
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 9.  Anterior endoscopic discectomy and fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Lawrence G Lenke
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2003-08-01       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Segmental pedicle screw fixation in the treatment of thoracic idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  S I Suk; C K Lee; W J Kim; Y J Chung; Y B Park
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1995-06-15       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  11 in total

Review 1.  Comment regarding "Is anterior release effective to increase flexibility in idiopathic thoracic scoliosis? Assessment by traction films" (A. Hempfing et al.).

Authors:  Vincent Arlet
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-10-11       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  [Posterior operative correction of idiopathic scoliosis. Value of pedicle screws versus hooks].

Authors:  V Bullmann; U R Liljenqvist; C Schmidt; T L Schulte
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 1.087

3.  Is anterior release effective to increase flexibility in idiopathic thoracic scoliosis? Assessment by traction films.

Authors:  A Hempfing; L Ferraris; H Koller; J Rump; P Metz-Stavenhagen
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-10-11       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Combined anterior and posterior instrumentation in severe and rigid idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Viola Bullmann; Henry F H Halm; Tobias Schulte; Thomas Lerner; Thomas P Weber; Ulf R Liljenqvist
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-01-12       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Posterior fusion only for thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis of more than 80 degrees: pedicle screws versus hybrid instrumentation.

Authors:  Mario Di Silvestre; Georgios Bakaloudis; Francesco Lolli; Francesco Vommaro; Konstantinos Martikos; Patrizio Parisini
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-08-12       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Treatment of severe scoliosis with posterior-only approach arthrodesis and all-pedicle screw instrumentation.

Authors:  Marco Crostelli; Osvaldo Mazza; Massimo Mariani; Dario Mascello
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-09-24       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Comments on "In vivo demonstration of the effectiveness of thoracoscopic anterior release using the fulcrum bending radiograph: a report of five cases" (Cheung et al.).

Authors:  Vincent Arlet
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Intraoperative Halo-Femoral Traction in Surgical Treatment of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Curves between 70° and 90°: Is It Effective?

Authors:  Mehmet Nuri Erdem; Ismail Oltulu; Sinan Karaca; Seçkin Sari; Mehmet Aydogan
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2018-07-27

9.  Experience with an online prospective database on adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: development and implementation.

Authors:  Vincent Arlet; Jeffrey Shilt; Ernesto Bersusky; Mark Abel; Jean Albert Ouellet; Davis Evans; K V Menon; Frank Kandziora; Frank Shen; Claudio Lamartina; Marc Adams; Vasantha Reddi
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-10-02       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Comparative Analysis of Combined (First Anterior, Then Posterior) Versus Only Posterior Approach for Treating Severe Scoliosis: A Mean Follow Up of 8.5 Years.

Authors:  Nikša Hero; Rok Vengust; Matevž Topolovec
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 3.241

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.