Literature DB >> 22423721

Pitch strength of normal and dysphonic voices.

Rahul Shrivastav1, David A Eddins, Supraja Anand.   

Abstract

Two sounds with the same pitch may vary from each other based on saliency of their pitch sensation. This perceptual attribute is called "pitch strength." The study of voice pitch strength may be important in quantifying of normal and pathological qualities. The present study investigated how pitch strength varies across normal and dysphonic voices. A set of voices (vowel /a/) selected from the Kay Elemetrics Disordered Voice Database served as the stimuli. These stimuli demonstrated a wide range of voice quality. Ten listeners judged the pitch strength of these stimuli in an anchored magnitude estimation task. On a given trial, listeners heard three different stimuli. The first stimulus represented very low pitch strength (wide-band noise), the second stimulus consisted of the target voice and the third stimulus represented very high pitch strength (pure tone). Listeners estimated pitch strength of the target voice by positioning a continuous slider labeled with values between 0 and 1, reflecting the two anchor stimuli. Results revealed that listeners can judge pitch strength reliably in dysphonic voices. Moderate to high correlations with perceptual judgments of voice quality suggest that pitch strength may contribute to voice quality judgments.
© 2012 Acoustical Society of America

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22423721      PMCID: PMC3316683          DOI: 10.1121/1.3681937

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  18 in total

1.  Pitch strength and Stevens's power law.

Authors:  William P Shofner; George Selas
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2002-04

2.  The use of an auditory model in predicting perceptual ratings of breathy voice quality.

Authors:  Rahul Shrivastav
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 2.009

3.  Developing a single comparison stimulus for matching breathy voice quality.

Authors:  Sona Patel; Rahul Shrivastav; David A Eddins
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2012-01-03       Impact factor: 2.297

4.  Least mean square measures of voice perturbation.

Authors:  P Milenkovic
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1987-12

5.  The dominance region and ripple noise pitch: a test of the peripheral weighting model.

Authors:  W A Yost
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1982-08       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Strength of the pitches associated with ripple noise.

Authors:  W A Yost
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1978-08       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Pitch strength and pitch dominance of iterated rippled noises in hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  M R Leek; V Summers
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  A model for the prediction of breathiness in vowels.

Authors:  Rahul Shrivastav; Arturo Camacho; Sona Patel; David A Eddins
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 2.482

9.  Pitch and pitch discrimination of broadband signals with rippled power spectra.

Authors:  W A Yost
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1978-04       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Objective measures of breathy voice quality obtained using an auditory model.

Authors:  Rahul Shrivastav; Christine M Sapienza
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  10 in total

1.  Evolution of tonal organization in music mirrors symbolic representation of perceptual reality. Part-1: Prehistoric.

Authors:  Aleksey Nikolsky
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-10-16

2.  Pitch Strength as an Outcome Measure for Treatment of Dysphonia.

Authors:  Lisa M Kopf; Cristina Jackson-Menaldi; Adam D Rubin; Jean Skeffington; Eric J Hunter; Mark D Skowronski; Rahul Shrivastav
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2017-03-17       Impact factor: 2.009

3.  Refining algorithmic estimation of relative fundamental frequency: Accounting for sample characteristics and fundamental frequency estimation method.

Authors:  Jennifer M Vojtech; Roxanne K Segina; Daniel P Buckley; Katharine R Kolin; Monique C Tardif; J Pieter Noordzij; Cara E Stepp
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Effects of voice-sparing cricotracheal resection on phonation in women.

Authors:  Kristine Tanner; Christopher Dromey; Mark L Berardi; Lisa M Mattei; Jenny L Pierce; Jonathan J Wisco; Eric J Hunter; Marshall E Smith
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2016-11-24       Impact factor: 3.325

5.  Reproducibility of Voice Parameters: The Effect of Room Acoustics and Microphones.

Authors:  Pasquale Bottalico; Juliana Codino; Lady Catherine Cantor-Cutiva; Katherine Marks; Charles J Nudelman; Jean Skeffington; Rahul Shrivastav; Maria Cristina Jackson-Menaldi; Eric J Hunter; Adam D Rubin
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2018-11-22       Impact factor: 2.009

6.  Assessments of Voice Use and Voice Quality Among College/University Singing Students Ages 18-24 Through Ambulatory Monitoring With a Full Accelerometer Signal.

Authors:  Matthew J Schloneger; Eric J Hunter
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2016-02-17       Impact factor: 2.009

7.  The Perception of Breathiness in the Voices of Pediatric Speakers.

Authors:  Lisa M Kopf; Mark D Skowronski; Supraja Anand; David A Eddins; Rahul Shrivastav
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2017-11-20       Impact factor: 2.009

8.  Modeling of Breathy Voice Quality Using Pitch-strength Estimates.

Authors:  David A Eddins; Supraja Anand; Arturo Camacho; Rahul Shrivastav
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 2.009

9.  Comparison of Pitch Strength With Perceptual and Other Acoustic Metric Outcome Measures Following Medialization Laryngoplasty.

Authors:  Adam D Rubin; Cristina Jackson-Menaldi; Lisa M Kopf; Katherine Marks; Jean Skeffington; Mark D Skowronski; Rahul Shrivastav; Eric J Hunter
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 2.009

10.  Towards a Singing Voice Multi-Sensor Analysis Tool: System Design, and Assessment Based on Vocal Breathiness.

Authors:  Evangelos Angelakis; Natalia Kotsani; Anastasia Georgaki
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-11-30       Impact factor: 3.576

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.