Literature DB >> 8896366

Limits to flight energetics of hummingbirds hovering in hypodense and hypoxic gas mixtures.

P Chai1, R Dudley.   

Abstract

Hovering hummingbirds offer a model locomotor system for which analyses of both metabolism and flight mechanics are experimentally tractable. Because hummingbirds exhibit the highest mass-specific metabolic rates among vertebrates, maximum performance of hovering flight represents the upper limit of aerobic locomotion in vertebrates. This study evaluates the potential constraints of flight mechanics and oxygen availability on maximum flight performance. Hummingbird flight performance was manipulated non-invasively using air and gas mixtures which influenced metabolism via variable oxygen partial pressure and/or altered flight mechanics via variable air densities. Limits to the locomotor capacity of hovering ruby-throated hummingbirds (Archilochus colubris) were unequivocally indicated by aerodynamic failure in either air/helium or air/heliox mixtures. Air/helium mixtures are hypodense and hypoxic; failure to sustain hovering flight occurred at 63% of the density of sea-level air and at an oxygen concentration of 12%. Air/heliox mixtures are hypodense but normoxic; failure in hovering occurred at 47% of sea-level air density. Thus, hummingbirds demonstrated considerable power reserves in hovering flight as well as hypoxic tolerance. In air/helium mixtures, hovering was limited by oxygen supply and not by flight mechanics. Birds hovering in air/helium mixtures increased their mechanical power output but not their rate of oxygen consumption. By contrast, birds hovering in air/heliox mixtures increased both mechanical performance and metabolic expenditure. Under hypoxia, hovering hummingbirds demonstrated non-negligible, but still limited, capacities for anaerobic metabolism and/or oxygen storage. Depending on the physical context, hummingbird flight performance can therefore be limited by oxygen availability or by flight aerodynamics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8896366     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.199.10.2285

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  16 in total

1.  Did Adult Diurnal Activity Influence the Evolution of Wing Morphology in Opoptera Butterflies?

Authors:  C M Penz; K B Heine
Journal:  Neotrop Entomol       Date:  2015-10-01       Impact factor: 1.434

2.  Wingbeat kinematics and energetics during weightlifting in hovering hummingbirds across an elevational gradient.

Authors:  Derrick J E Groom; M Cecilia B Toledo; Kenneth C Welch
Journal:  J Comp Physiol B       Date:  2016-07-18       Impact factor: 2.200

3.  Resolution of a paradox: hummingbird flight at high elevation does not come without a cost.

Authors:  Douglas L Altshuler; Robert Dudley; Jimmy A McGuire
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-12-14       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Allometry of hummingbird lifting performance.

Authors:  D L Altshuler; R Dudley; S M Heredia; J A McGuire
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2010-03-01       Impact factor: 3.312

5.  Hummingbird wing efficacy depends on aspect ratio and compares with helicopter rotors.

Authors:  Jan W Kruyt; Elsa M Quicazán-Rubio; GertJan F van Heijst; Douglas L Altshuler; David Lentink
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2014-10-06       Impact factor: 4.118

6.  Extreme and variable torpor among high-elevation Andean hummingbird species.

Authors:  Blair O Wolf; Andrew E McKechnie; C Jonathan Schmitt; Zenon J Czenze; Andrew B Johnson; Christopher C Witt
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2020-09-09       Impact factor: 3.703

7.  Hovering performance of Anna's hummingbirds (Calypte anna) in ground effect.

Authors:  Erica J Kim; Marta Wolf; Victor Manuel Ortega-Jimenez; Stanley H Cheng; Robert Dudley
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2014-09-06       Impact factor: 4.118

Review 8.  Sugar flux through the flight muscles of hovering vertebrate nectarivores: a review.

Authors:  Kenneth C Welch; Chris C W Chen
Journal:  J Comp Physiol B       Date:  2014-07-17       Impact factor: 2.200

9.  Flight costs of long, sexually selected tails in hummingbirds.

Authors:  Christopher James Clark; Robert Dudley
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-03-11       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Three-dimensional flow and lift characteristics of a hovering ruby-throated hummingbird.

Authors:  Jialei Song; Haoxiang Luo; Tyson L Hedrick
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2014-09-06       Impact factor: 4.118

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.